• Complain

Robert Stalnaker - Context

Here you can read online Robert Stalnaker - Context full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Oxford University Press, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Robert Stalnaker Context

Context: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Context" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Robert Stalnaker explores the notion of the context in which speech takes place, its role in the interpretation of what is said, and in the explanation of the dynamics of discourse. He distinguishes different notions of context, but the main focus is on the notion of context as common ground, where the common ground is an evolving body of background information that is presumed to be shared by the participants in a conversation. The common ground is the information that is presupposed by speakers and addressees, and a central concern of this book is with the notion of presupposition, and with the interaction of compositional structure with discourse dynamics in the explanation of presuppositional phenomena. Presupposed information includes background information both about the subject matter of a discourse and about the evolving discourse itself, and about the attitudes of the participants in the discourse, including who and where they are, and what they agree and disagree about. Stalnaker provides a way of representing self-locating information that helps to explain how it can be shared and communicated, and how it evolves over time. He discusses the semantic and pragmatics of conditionals and epistemic modals, and their role in representing agreement, disagreement, and the negotiation about how a context should evolve. The book concludes with a discussion of the relations between contextualism and semantic relativism.

Robert Stalnaker: author's other books


Who wrote Context? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Context — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Context" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Context CONTEXT AND CONTENT Series editor Franois Recanati Institut - photo 1
Context
CONTEXT AND CONTENT

Series editor: Franois Recanati, Institut Nicod

Other titles in the series:

The Inessential Indexical

On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person

Herman Cappelen and Josh Dever

The Mirror of the World

Subjects, Consciousness, and Self-Consciousness

Christopher Peacocke

Assessment Sensitivity

Relative Truth and its Applications

John MacFarlane

Context

Robert Stalnaker

Context - image 2

Context - image 3

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries

Robert C. Stalnaker 2014

The moral rights of the author have been asserted

First Edition published in 2014

Impression: 1

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above

You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available

Library of Congress Control Number: 2013957454

ISBN 9780199645169
ebook ISBN 9780191027208

As printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY

Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.

Contents

This book had its roots in work begun more than forty years ago on presupposition and assertion, and I have been tinkering with the ideas I sketched then, off and on, ever since. I am grateful for the opportunity provided by Franois Recanati to further develop these ideas in a set of lectures in his Content and Context series. I benefited from stimulating discussion at those lectures from, among others, Herb Clark, Kathrin Gler-Pagin, Peter Pagin, Franois Recanati, and Isadora Stojanovic. These four lectures, given in Paris in 2010, grew to six when I gave the Gaos lectures the next year in Mexico City at the Instituto de Investigaciones Filficas at the Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mexico. I am grateful to the philosophers of language at the UNAM for the invitation to give these lectures, and for the stimulating discussions that I had with them during my month there. Thanks also to the philosophers at Brown University where earlier versions of three of the chapters constituted the Josiah Royce lectures, given there in 2007.

The 1970s, when I first started thinking about pragmatics, were exciting times in the philosophy of language, with a lot of fruitful interaction between philosophers and linguists, who were just inventing theoretical semantics and pragmatics as it is practiced today. Among the linguists who helped to draw me into the subject at that time and to appreciate the relevance of their work to philosophical issues were Lauri Karttunen, George Lakoff, Barbara Partee, Stan Peters, and Sally McConnell-Ginet.

Philosophers and linguists tended to go their separate ways in the decade after the 1970s, but from the early 90s to the present, interdisciplinary work in semantics/pragmatics, and philosophical uses of linguistic results have again flourished. Interdisciplinary work is more demanding than it was in the 70s, since a lot of sophisticated theory has been developed since then, and alternative frameworks have proliferated. But I have had a lot of help from the work of many linguists, and from discussion with them, including Angelika Kratzer, Paul Portner, Craige Roberts, Philippe Schlenker, Mandy Simons, and my MIT colleagues, Kai von Fintel, Danny Fox, Irene Heim, and Sabine Iatridou.

Among philosophers, my debts to Paul Grice, David Kaplan, David Lewis, John Perry, and Mark Richard will be evident from the discussion in the book of their work and ideas.

I and my colleagues in philosophy at MIT have been fortunate to have a really excellent group of graduate students over the past few decades, many of whom have made and are making important contributions to the fast moving interdisciplinary field of pragmatics. Their work, and discussion with them while they were students and since, have had a profound, and I hope positive, influence on the ideas that I develop in this book. This group, going back more than twenty years, includes Lenny Clapp, Andy Egan, Sarah Moss, Dilip Ninan, Alejandro Prez Carballo, Agustn Rayo, Paolo Santorio, Jason Stanley, Eric Swanson, Zoltan Gendler Szab, and Seth Yalcin.

Craige Roberts read a complete draft of the manuscript, and gave me extremely helpful comments that led to major revision and reorganization. The ideas developed in were strongly influenced by Seth Yalcins work on epistemic modals, and extensive correspondence and discussion with him about these issues led to significant corrections and (I hope) improvements. Thanks to both Craige and Seth for their help.

A version of . Thanks to Oxford University Press for permission to include parts of that paper in this book.

Thanks to my editor, Peter Momtchiloff for advice, support, and patience. Thanks also to Jan Chamier for meticulous copy editing, and to Jack Marley-Payne for editorial help at the last stage of the process, including compiling the index.

This book is an exploration of the contexts in which speech takes place, of the ways we represent them, and of the roles they play in explaining the interpretation and dynamics of speech. In this introductory overview, my aim is to provide a sketch of the general line of argument of the book, the narrative, as they say. Or perhaps I should say that my aim is to set the argument of the book in context.

The central thesis that guides the exploration is that it is possible and fruitful to theorize about the structure and function of discourse independently of specific theory about the mechanisms that languages use to serve those functions. This rough statement of the thesis (which I will dub the autonomy of pragmatics) needs to be refined and qualified, which I will try to do in the course of the book. I will defend the thesis mainly by developing some pragmatic theory that I hope will illustrate it, and by applying that theory to the explanation of a range of specific linguistic phenomena. The thesis needs qualification since the data to be explained by such a theory are always data concerning the uses of particular expressions of particular languages, and interpreting the data requires making some assumptions about the semantics of the expressions involved, but the hope is that one can sometimes defend and apply purely pragmatic principles while making only relatively uncontroversial assumptions about the semantics. Even though the focus will be on pragmatic explanation, the interaction of context with semantic interpretation will be a central concern of the book.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Context»

Look at similar books to Context. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Context»

Discussion, reviews of the book Context and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.