• Complain

Jon Birger - Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game

Here you can read online Jon Birger - Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2015, publisher: Workman Publishing Company, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Workman Publishing Company
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Its not that hes just not that into youits that there arent enough of him. And the numbers prove it. Using a combination of demographics, statistics, game theory, and number-crunching, Date-onomics tells what every single, college-educated, heterosexual, looking-for-a-partner woman needs to know: The man deficit is real. Its a fascinating, if sobering read, with two critical takeaways: One, its not you. Two, knowledge is power, so heres what to do about it.
The shortage of college-educated men is not just a big-city phenomenon frustrating women in New York and L.A. Among young college grads, there are four eligible women for every three men nationwide. This unequal ratio explains not only why its so hard to find a date, but a host of social issues, from the college hookup culture to the reason Salt Lake City is becoming the breast implant capital of America. Then theres the math that says that a womans good looks can keep men from approaching herparticularly if they feel the odds arent in their favor.
Fortunately, there are also solutions: what college to attend (any with strong sciences or math), where to hang out (in New York, try a firemans bar), where to live (Colorado, Seattle, Man Jose), and why never to shy away from giving an ultimatum.

Jon Birger: author's other books


Who wrote Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

DATE ONOMICS

How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game

Jon Birger

Workman Publishing

New York

Contents

Chapter 1

The Man Deficit

My friend Sarah Donovan is a gem. Shes kind. Shes funny. Shes an Ivy Leaguer, and a head-turner too. Professionally, Sarah is a star: a top journalist as well as a familiar face and voice on television and radio.

Sarah is also 41 years old and unmarried. And it is this predicamentone that saddens Sarah, perplexes her friends, and frustrates her parentsthat is the catalyst for this book. American cities are filled with Sarah Donovanseducated, successful, personable, often attractive women whose dating woes make little sense to those around them. Their stories are well chronicled in novels, movies, and TV shows, from Bridget Joness Diary to Sex and the City to Girls. On-screen, these tales usually have happy endings. In real life? Its not so easy. Come to think of it, I dont think Ive ever had someone ask me if they knew any nice girls for their son, said Jeffrey Sirkman, the longtime rabbi at Larchmont Temple in Larchmont, New York, and a keen observer of the marriage market. But just about every week some mother or father will ask me whether I know of any nice guys for their daughter. Why is that?

Why indeed. Why is it that women like Donovan struggle to find marriage-material men even as male counterparts with less going for them seem to have little trouble with the opposite sex? Attempts to answer such questions have spawned a cottage industry of self-help books for womendating guides that portray the failure to find Mr. Right as a strategic problem, one that can be fixed by playing hard to get or by following a few simple dating rules. Underlying all such advice is an assumption that the perceived shortage of college-educated mena phenomenon that I call the man deficitis actually a mirage. At birth there are more boys than girls: 1.05 boys are born in the U.S. for every 1 girl. So if college-educated women just become better datersif they can get inside mens heads and understand what makes them committhere should be enough college-educated men out there for everyone.

But what if the problem is not strategic? What if most of the good men are taken? What if a disproportionate number of the single guys still out there really are incorrigible commitment-phobes just looking for a good time? What if it doesnt just seem as if theres a third more single women than men in every semi-upscale bar in Manhattan or Dallas or L.A.? What if the demographics actually bear that out? What if the hookup culture on todays college campuses and the wild ways of the big-city singles scene have little to do with changing values and a whole lot to do with lopsided gender ratios that pressure 19-year-old girls to put out and discourage 30-year-old guys from settling down?

What if, in other words, the man deficit were real?

Well, it is real, and the numbers are so shocking its a wonder they are not talked about incessantly. According to 2012 population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureaus American Community Survey, there are 5.5 million college-educated women in the U.S. between the ages of 22 and 29 versus 4.1 million such men. In other words, the dating pool for college graduates in their twenties really does have 33 percent more women than menor four women for every three men. Among college grads age 30 to 39, there are 7.4 million women versus 6.0 million men, which is five women for every four men. These lopsided gender ratios may add up to sexual nirvana for heterosexual men, but for heterosexual womenespecially those who put a high priority on getting married and having children in wedlockthey represent a demographic time bomb.

How exactly did gender ratios for the college educated get so skewed? The simple answer is that women have been attending college at higher rates than men since the 1980s, and at a much higher rate since the late 1990s. In 2012, 34 percent more women than men graduated from four-year colleges, and this gaping gender gap in college education spilled over into the post-college dating pool long ago. The shortage of college-educated mena 1.4 millionman deficit among those 22 to 29has been exacerbated by the increased reluctance of college-educated Americans to marry those lacking a college degree. According to separate research published by University of Pennsylvania economist Jeremy Greenwood and by UCLA sociologists Christine Schwartz and Robert Mare, educational intermarriage is less common today than at any point over the past half century.

As poor as the marriage market may be for educated, 40-something women like my friend Sarah, the long-term outlook for young millennial women is decidedly worse. In the U.S. there are 39 percent more college-grad women age 24 and younger than there are men in the same age cohort, according to Census data. (The man deficit is larger post-college than during college in part because foreign students are disproportionately male.) In Manhattan, the pool of 24-and-under college grads has 38 percent more women than men. In Raleigh, North Carolina, the gap is 49 percent. In Miami and Washington, D.C., its 86 percent and 49 percent, respectively. Los Angeles: 37 percent. Moreover, for reasons Ill explore later involving the demographics of the gay and lesbian community, the Census numbers probably understate the true size of heterosexual gender gaps in LGBTQ-friendly cities such as Miami, New York, and L.A. The bottom line is that by the time todays educated, early-twenties women are ready to marry, theyll be confronted with a marriage market far more daunting than the one their older cousins or younger aunts graduated into twenty years ago. Meanwhile, young male college grads now enjoy such an overabundance of sexual options that it will be interesting to see when (or if?) some of these men choose to settle down.

Picture 1

This book will make the case that the college and post-college hookup culture, the decline in marriage rates among college-educated women, and the dearth of marriage-material men willing to commit are all by-products of lopsided gender ratios and a massive undersupply of college-educated men. The conventional explanations for these trends all seem rooted in a kind of social entropy in which male-female relations naturally devolve from the traditional to the libertine. Despite a wealth of academic research showing how sex ratios affect dating behavior, demographics never seem to be part of the conversation.

Consider a 1,900-word New York Times article from January 2013 on the citys hookup culture. The Times storyheadline: The End of Courtship?documented the demise of traditional first dates as well as the rise of debauched one-night stands and the pseudo-relationships that follow. Hey babe, what are you up to this weekend? was the Thursday night text message one guy would send his off-and-on sex partner. The Times story blamed the hookup culture on everything from technology (Online research makes the first date feel unnecessary) to the lousy economy (Faced with a lingering recession, a stagnant job market, and mountains of student debt, many young peopleparticularly victims of the mancessionsimply cannot afford to invest a fancy dinner or show in someone they may or may not click with).

Not once did the Times mention gender ratios or the fact that New York City has 100,000 more women than men who are college educated and under age 35. In New York, with a new crop of college grads arriving every summer, the citys dating pool is like a market that just wont clear, said Andrew Beveridge, a demographer and sociology professor at New Yorks Queens College. Consider Murray Hill, which has become a hot neighborhood for young Manhattan singles. According to Census tract data, in the age 20 to 29 cohort, there are 2.3 never-married women in Murray Hill for every 1 never-married man. In the trendy, club-filled Meatpacking District, there are 2.2 never-married women for every 1 never-married man. With numbers like these, its no wonder that men feel no rush to marry and that women stop playing hard to get.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game»

Look at similar books to Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game»

Discussion, reviews of the book Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.