• Complain

Eino Kaila - Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism

Here you can read online Eino Kaila - Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Open Court, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Translated by Anssi KorhonenFinnish philosopher Eino Kaila wrote a classic statement of logical empiricism. Having experienced the foundational debates of the Vienna Circle in 1929, Kaila was a keen follower of the further developments of the Circle. His synoptic presentation and analysis of the basic themes, or theses, of the movement was based on his lectures as professor of theoretical philosophy at the University of Helsinki. The work appeared as a book in Finnish in 1939 and a Swedish translation by Georg Henrik von Wright followed immediately. Earlier, a translation of his philosophical essays from the original German, entitled Reality and Experience, appeared in 1979. However, this is the first translation of Kailas major epistemological work, which remains a source for re-evaluations of Logical Empiricism.

Eino Kaila: author's other books


Who wrote Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Human Knowledge

Steve Awodey Editor EDITORIAL BOARD John Norton University of Pittsburgh - photo 1

Steve Awodey Editor EDITORIAL BOARD John Norton University of Pittsburgh - photo 2

Steve Awodey, Editor

EDITORIAL BOARD

John Norton

University of Pittsburgh

Richard Creath

Arizona State University

Michael Friedman

Stanford University

James Lennox

University of Pittsburgh

Wilfried Sieg

Carnegie Mellon University

Mark Wilson

University of Pittsburgh

John Earman

University of Pittsburgh

Gottfried Gabriel

University of Jena

Dana Scott

Carnegie Mellon University

Gereon Wolters

University of Constance

VOLUME 1 Freges Lectures on Logic Carnaps Student Notes 19101914 edited - photo 3

VOLUME 1.

Freges Lectures on Logic: Carnaps Student Notes, 19101914, edited by Erich H. Reck and Steve Awodey

VOLUME 2.

Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena, edited by Steve Awodey and Carsten Klein

VOLUME 3.

The Concept of Probability in the Mathematical Representation of Reality, by Hans Reichenbach, translated and edited by Frederick Eberhardt and Clark Glymour

VOLUME 4.

Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circles Protocol-Sentence Debate, by Thomas Uebel

VOLUME 5.

Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science, by Greg Frost-Arnold

VOLUME 6.

Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism, by Eino Kaila, translated by Anssi Korhonen, edited by Juha Manninen, Ilkka Niiniluoto, and George A. Reisch

To order books from Open Court call toll-free 1-800-815-2280 or visit our - photo 4To order books from Open Court call toll-free 1-800-815-2280 or visit our - photo 5

To order books from Open Court, call toll-free 1-800-815-2280, or visit our website at www.opencourtbooks.com.

Open Court Publishing Company is a division of ePals Corporation.

Copyright 2014 Carus Publishing Company, dba ePals Media

First printing 2014

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, Open Court Publishing Company, a division of Carus Publishing Company, dba ePals Media, 70 East Lake Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60601.

Designed by John Grandits.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Kaila, Eino, 1890-1958.

[Inhimillinen tieto. English]

Human knowledge : a classic statement of logical empiricism / Eino Kaila ; translated by Anssi Korhonen ; edited by Juha Manninen, Ilkka Niiniluoto and George A. Reisch.

pages cm. -- (Publications of the Archive of Scientific Philosophy, Hillman Library, University Of Pittsburgh ; Volume 6)

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-0-8126-9851-0 (epub) 1. Logical positivism. I. Manninen, Juha, editor of compilation. II. Title.

B824.6.K3513 2014

121--dc23

2014003105

Contents

by Juha Manninen and Ilkka Niiniluoto Eino Kaila 18901958 was Professor of - photo 6

by Juha Manninen and Ilkka Niiniluoto Eino Kaila 18901958 was Professor of - photo 7

by Juha Manninen and Ilkka Niiniluoto

Eino Kaila (18901958) was Professor of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Helsinki. In 1939 he published the book Inhimillinen tieto: Mit se on ja mit se ei ole (Human Knowledge: What It Is and What It Is Not).evidently better than von Wrights own exposition, Den logiska empirismen of 1943.

Kailas old friend Rudolf Carnap (18911970) read the book in Swedish, but not without some difficulty. Shortly after he read it, Finland was attacked by the Soviet Union in the wake of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact between Stalin and Hitler. Carnap wrote to Kaila from Chicago that January of 1940:

From the moment Finland was dragged into the tragic events in Europe, I have thought of you very much. We follow the events with vivid concern here. The newspapers report the details daily and not only we Europeans but all Americans are united in sympathy for your country. When you wrote your letter of 12 November, you were still in peaceful Helsinki and now I do not know where you are meanwhile. [...] When I read the newspaper reports and see pictures of Helsinki in ruins, vivid memories reawaken of the time when I was in your beautiful city, in Wiborg, in Sortavala, on the island of Valamo, at Imatra, and other places in Finland and grew fond of your beautiful country. [...] I urgently hope and wish from my heart that in the not distant future a peace is made which secures Finlands independence.

Finland was able to preserve her independence and democracy without ever being occupied by any of the national forces that rushed into warbut not without losing territory to its enormous neighbor to the east, including some of the areas mentioned by Carnap as he recalled his travels (one of which, Terijoki, was a popular holiday resort near St. Petersburg, where Carnap went in the early 1920s in connection with a conference dedicated to Esperanto). Most of Carnaps comments, however, concerned Kailas book and some critical observations about it. Responding to a letter from Kaila (now lost), Carnap wrote:

Thank you very much for sending me the book. [...] I found it here when I came back to Chicago at the end of December. We were in Florida for a few months, where I found a quiet place to work on semantics. Since reading Swedish costs me much time and effort, I have not read your book completely. I have gone through the main sections and read closely the section that you pointed out to me. My impression is that the book is very suitable as an introduction to the conceptions of empiricism, and I would be very pleased were it to appear in English. I especially welcome the fact that you pay attention to the historical connections. For many readers this will be very welcome, since in our existing publications the historical connections are mostly ignored. How things stand on the question of publication from the business viewpoint of a publishing house, particularly under the current difficult circumstances, I cant say at the moment. Under normal circumstances I would think that the book would be well suited for our Library of Unified Science, published in Holland. I will write to Neurath that he should speak with the publisher about this question. You write that in this case you would like to revise the work. Can you quickly estimate whether you should find the time in the near future, in case the publisher will bring out the book, and how long you would need? Perhaps you could write Neurath directly about this question or send him a carbon-copy of your letters to me, so that not too much time is lost.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism»

Look at similar books to Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism»

Discussion, reviews of the book Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.