• Complain

Manhattan GMAT - Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems

Here you can read online Manhattan GMAT - Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: Manhattan Prep Publishing, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Manhattan GMAT Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems
  • Book:
    Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Manhattan Prep Publishing
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Manhattan GMAT: author's other books


Who wrote Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Appendix A
Data Sufficiency

Data Sufficiency (DS) problems are a cross between math and logic. Imagine that your boss just walked into your office and dumped a bunch of papers on your desk, saying, Hey, our client wants to know whether they should raise the price on this product. Can you answer that question from this data? If so, which pieces do we need to prove the case? What would you do?

The client has asked a specific question: should the company raise the price? You have to decide which pieces of information will allow you to answer that questionor, possibly, that you don't have enough information to answer the question at all.

This kind of logical reasoning is exactly what you use when you answer DS questions.

How Data Sufficiency Works

If you already feel comfortable with the basics of Data Sufficiency, you may want to move quickly through this particular section of the chapterbut you are encouraged to read it. There are a few insights that you may find useful.

Every DS problem has the same basic form:

The question stem contains the question you need to answer The two statements - photo 1

The question stem contains the question you need to answer. The two statements provide given information, information that is true. DS questions look strange but you can think of them as deconstructed Problem Solving (PS) questions. Compare the DS-format problem above to the PS-format problem below:

Samuel is 4 years younger than Dmitry, and Samuel will be 11 years old in 5 years. If Oliver is twice as old as Dmitry, how old is Oliver?

The two questions contain exactly the same information; that information is just presented in a different order. The PS question stem contains all of the givens as well as the question. The DS problem moves some of the givens down to statement (1) and statement (2).

As with regular PS problems, the given information in the DS statements is always true. In addition, the two statements won't contradict each other. In the same way that a PS question wouldn't tell you that x > 0 and x < 0, the two DS statements won't do that either.

In the PS format, you would go ahead and calculate Oliver's age. The DS format works a bit differently. Here is the full problem, including the answer choices:

If Oliver is twice as old as Dmitry, how old is Oliver?

(1) Samuel is 4 years younger than Dmitry.

(2) Samuel will be 11 years old in 5 years.

(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) is NOT sufficient.

(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) is NOT sufficient.

(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Despite all appearances, the question is not actually asking you to calculate Oliver's age. Rather, it's asking which pieces of information would allow you to calculate Oliver's age.

You may already be able solve this one on your own, but you'll see much harder problems on the test, so your first task is to learn how to work through DS questions in a systematic, consistent way.

As you think the problem through, jot down information from the question stem:

Hmm If they tell you Dmitrys age then you can find Olivers age Remember - photo 2

Hmm. If they tell you Dmitry's age, then you can find Oliver's age. Remember that!

Take a look at the first statement. Also, write down the answer grid youll learn why as you work through the problem 1 Samuel is 4 - photo 3 answer grid (you'll learn why as you work through the problem):

(1) Samuel is 4 years younger than Dmitry.

The first statement doesnt allow you to figure out anyones real age - photo 4

The first statement doesn't allow you to figure out anyone's real age. Statement (1), then, is not sufficient. Now you can cross off the top row of answers, (A) and (D).

Why? Here's the text for answers (A) and (D):

(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) is NOT sufficient.

(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

Both answers indicate that statement (1) is sufficient to answer the question. Because statement (1) is not sufficient to find Oliver's age, both (A) and (D) are wrong.

The answer choices will always appear in the order shown for the above problem, so any time you decide that statement (1) is not sufficient, you will always cross off answers (A) and (D). That's why your answer grid groups these two answers together.

Next, consider statement (2), but remember one tricky thing: forget what statement (1) told you. Because of the way DS is constructed, you must evaluate the two statements separately before you look at them together:

(2) Samuel will be 11 years old in 5 years.

Its useful to write the two statements side-by-side as shown above to help - photo 5

It's useful to write the two statements side-by-side, as shown above, to help remember that statement (2) is separate from statement (1) and has to be considered by itself first.

Statement (2) does indicate how old Sam is now, but says nothing about Oliver or Dmitry. (Remember, you're looking only at statement (2) now.) By itself, statement (2) is not sufficient, so cross off answer (B).

Now that you've evaluated each statement by itself, take a look at the two statements together. Statement (2) provides Sam's age, and statement (1) allows you to calculate Dmitry's age if you know Sam's age. Finally, the question stem allows you to calculate Oliver's age if you know Dmitry's age:

As soon as you can tell that you can solve put down a check mark or write an S - photo 6

As soon as you can tell that you can solve, put down a check mark or write an S with a circle around it (or both!). Don't actually calculate Oliver's age; the GMAT doesn't give you any extra time to calculate a number that you don't need.

The correct answer is (C).

The Answer Choices

The five Data Sufficiency answer choices will always be exactly the same (and presented in the same order), so memorize them before you go into the test.

Here are the five answers written in an easier way to understand:

(A) Statement (1) does allow you to answer the question, but statement (2) does not.

(B) Statement (2) does allow you to answer the question, but statement (1) does not.

(C) Neither statement works on its own, but you can use them together to answer the question.

(D) Statement (1) works by itself and statement (2) works by itself.

(E) Nothing works. Even if you use both statements together, you still can't answer the question.

Answer (C) specifically says that neither statement works on its own. For this reason, you are required to look at each statement by itself and decide that neither one works before you are allowed to evaluate the two statements together.

Here's an easier way to remember the five answer choices; we call this the twelve-ten mnemonic (memory aid):

Within the next week memorize the DS answers If you do a certain number of - photo 7

Within the next week, memorize the DS answers. If you do a certain number of practice DS problems in that time frame, you'll likely memorize the answers without conscious effortand you'll solidify the DS lessons you're learning right now.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems»

Look at similar books to Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems»

Discussion, reviews of the book Manhattan GMAT Strategy Guide 3 : Word Problems and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.