• Complain

Matt Stoller - Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy

Here you can read online Matt Stoller - Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2019, publisher: Simon & Schuster, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Simon & Schuster
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A startling look at how concentrated financial power and consumerism transformed American politics, resulting in the emergence of populism and authoritarianism, the fall of the Democratic Partywhile also providing the steps needed to create a new democracy.Americans once had a coherent and clear understanding of political tyranny, one crafted by Thomas Jefferson and updated for the industrial age by Louis Brandeis. A concentration of power, whether in the hands of a military dictator or a JP Morgan, was understood as autocratic and dangerous to individual liberty and democracy. This idea stretched back to the countrys founding. In the 1930s, people observed that the Great Depression was caused by financial concentration in the hands of a few whose misuse of their power induced a financial collapse. They drew on this tradition to craft the New Deal.In Goliath, Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Todays bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stollers study will only grow more relevant as time passes. Building upon his viral article in The Atlantic, How the Democrats Killed Their Populist Soul, Stoller illustrates in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.

Matt Stoller: author's other books


Who wrote Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide
Goliath The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy - image 1
Goliath The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy - image 2

Goliath The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy - image 3

Simon & Schuster

1230 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020

www.SimonandSchuster.com

Copyright 2019 by Matt Stoller

All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever. For information, address Simon & Schuster Subsidiary Rights Department, 1230 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020.

First Simon & Schuster hardcover edition October 2019

SIMON & SCHUSTER and colophon are registered trademarks of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

For information about special discounts for bulk purchases, please contact Simon & Schuster Special Sales at 1-866-506-1949 or .

The Simon & Schuster Speakers Bureau can bring authors to your live event. For more information or to book an event, contact the Simon & Schuster Speakers Bureau at 1-866-248-3049 or visit our website at www.simonspeakers.com.

Interior design by Lewelin Polanco

Jacket design by Kapo Ng

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been applied for.

ISBN 978-1-5011-8308-9

ISBN 978-1-5011-8309-6 (ebook)

PREFACE

Power always thinks it has a great Soul, and vast Views, beyond the Comprehension of the Weak, and that it is doing Gods Service, when it is violating all his Laws.

John Adams

Goliath The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy - image 4

M ary Russell of The Washington Post called them the Red Guard of the Revolution.

In January of 1975, a giant crop of angry and newly elected Democratsnicknamed Watergate Babiescame to Washington, D.C. They were long-haired, young, aggressive, and progressive, determined to clean up government and stop the war in Vietnam and they flooded into Congress. The raw number of pickups understated the change to the Democratic Party itself. Due to retirements, there were seventy-five new Democrats in the House of Representatives alone, many young, eager, and disdainful of the party hierarchy. More than 40 percent of all Democrats in the House had served for less than six years.

One of the first people this group targeted was an old man from rural Texas, a former tenant cotton farmer named Wright Patman, the head of the House Banking and Currency Committee who had first been elected to Congress in 1928. Antiwar liberals saw that the key to power in the House was through committees, with the flow of legislation controlled by committee chairmen picked based on length of service. Old menoften southern reactionarieshad used this seniority system to do terrible things, such as bottle up civil rights legislation. So existing liberals in office, with votes from the new radicals, demanded that the full Democratic Caucus get a say on who ran what committee.

Ironically, Patman had a lot in common with the incoming class. He was, for instance, the very first Democrat to investigate Watergate. But he was vulnerable to the new liberals he had helped elect. They were young, he was old. They were vehemently opposed to the war in Vietnam, he had voted for it. They were a TV generation, and knew affluence and campus politics. He was rural, southern, without a college degree, and had gone through the crucible of the 1930s. By contrast, as Watergate Baby Paul Tsongas observed, Our generation did not know the Depression.

And yet, something else was going on. Liberals were the face of the coup, but bankers were quietly organizing the rebellion from behind the scenes. For forty-five years, Patman had fought concentrated financial power and monopolies, part of a politics that stretched back to the founding of the country. He was the living embodiment of an American tradition, the last populist. And it was a tradition the financiers sought to kill.

The Watergate Babies didnt understand they were being manipulated. They were antiwar, not anti-bank. Some had even been bankers. His economic ideas were not in pace with modern concepts, said liberal congressman Pete Stark. Stark had been elected just two years before, becoming famous by putting a giant peace sign on his bank. Enemies of Patman told the newcomers that to be important, they had to make a mark. Nothing would do that like getting rid of the genial old man. Toby Moffett, another young congressman, bought into this. He called Patman a terrific fighter, but, he said, it seemed time to move on. Patmans politics, which focused on financial and monopoly power, was irrelevant.

The Texas delegation rose up in defense of the old man. Barbara Jordan, the star of the impeachment against Nixon and one of the few black women in Congress, supported Patman. His defenders were led by powerful Texas Democrat Jim Wright, who pleaded with the new members not to depose the one man who has been our most inveterate, most persistent, most consistent and most outspoken foe of monopoly, exorbitant interest rates, and special privileges of all sorts. In what one young member called the greatest political speech he had ever heard, Wright asked, must we commit patricide?

When it came time for the vote, Patmans loss was a foregone conclusion. He was crushed. It was indeed, as The Washington Post put it, a revolution.

A short time later, Patman died of pneumonia. His body was flown back to Texarkana in a United States Air Force transport plane, and his body taken through the district, stopping at a catfish restaurant in the African American section of town he frequented when he returned to the district. As the hearse passed, his constituents, whom he had called the plain people, lined the streets several deep. More than a thousand people packed the church at his funeral.

Jim Wright, later Speaker of the House, eulogized Patmans life. He often comforted the afflicted and afflicted the comfortable, talking of Patmans fights against big business, banks, and the Klan. Well done.

For two hundred years, Americans had fought concentrated power, relying on leaders like Patman. But now there was no one left to carry on the tradition. The new generation had, unwittingly, committed patricide.

Almost immediately, the liberal-led Congress was confronted with a mess of incomprehensible economic problems. The American economic engine was supposed to produce an endless surfeit of goods, services, and jobs, automatically. But now it was sputtering, with inflation, oil shocks, corporation bankruptcies, deep recession.

Without guidance, the new generation panicked. Rudderless and afraid, they turned to a group of scholars who promised them efficiency, progress, and freedom. All they had to do was undo the chains on concentrated power that men like Patman had spent their lives securing.

And so they did. They released the beast of monopoly upon the land. The revolution was here.


During the most recent financial crisis, in 20092010, I was a congressional staffer working for a member of Congress on the Financial Services Committee, what I would learn was Patmans old stomping grounds. I kept getting calls from constituents in foreclosure, in crisis, and nothing that my government and my party offered could help them, or was designed to help them. In aggregate, from 2008 to 2012, during the crisis, the American middle class lost roughly $6 trillion. The assets of the powerful recovered value quickly, those of the middle class did not. Meanwhile, political leaders rewarded the so-called Too Big to Fail banks with bailout money, and bank executives, far from being punished, would be rewarded with large bonuses. All over the world, the story was pretty much the same. Bonuses for bankers, little for the rest of us.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy»

Look at similar books to Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy»

Discussion, reviews of the book Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.