• Complain

Barry Gewen - The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World

Here you can read online Barry Gewen - The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: W. W. Norton Company, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Barry Gewen The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World
  • Book:
    The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    W. W. Norton Company
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Inevitability of Tragedy is a fascinating intellectual biography of Henry Kissinger that examines his unique role in government through his ideas. It analyzes the continuing controversies surrounding Kissingers policies in such places as Vietnam and Chile by offering an understanding of his definition of realism; his seemingly amoral belief that foreign affairs must be conducted through a balance of power; and his un-American view that promoting democracy is most likely to result in repeated defeats for the United States.
Barry Gewen places Kissingers ideas in a European context by tracing them through his experience as a refugee from Nazi Germany and exploring the links between his notions of power and those of his mentor, Hans Morgenthau, the father of realism, as well as those of two other German-Jewish migrs who shared his concerns about the weaknesses of democracy: Leo Strauss and Hannah Arendt.

Barry Gewen: author's other books


Who wrote The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide

THE INEVITABILITY OF TRAGEDY HENRY KISSINGER AND HIS WORLD BARRY GEWEN - photo 1

THE
INEVITABILITY
OF
TRAGEDY

HENRY KISSINGER
AND HIS WORLD

BARRY GEWEN

Copyright 2020 by Barry Gewen All rights reserved First Edition Since this page - photo 2

Copyright 2020 by Barry Gewen

All rights reserved

First Edition

Since this page cannot legibly accommodate all the copyright notices, constitute an extension of the copyright page.

For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, write to Permissions, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110

For information about special discounts for bulk purchases, please contact W. W. Norton Special Sales at specialsales@wwnorton.com or 800-233-4830

Jacket design by Yang Kim

Jacket photograph: Shutterstock

Book design by Lovedog Studio

Production manager: Anna Oler

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available

ISBN 978-1-324-00405-9

ISBN 978-1-324-00406-6 (eBook)

W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10110

www.wwnorton.com

W. W. Norton & Company Ltd., 15 Carlisle Street, London W1D 3BS

To my colleagues, past and present, at the
New York Times Book Review

There are certain truths which the Americans can learn only from strangers or from experience.

ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE

One has to live with a sense of the inevitability of tragedy.

HENRY KISSINGER

CONTENTS

PROLOGUE IN THE FIRST PERSON

A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, I WAS HAVING DINNER WITH A friend when he leaned across the table and whispered to me, Barry, Henry Kissinger is evil . He was in the middle of writing his own book on foreign policy, and in the course of a long friendship we had spent many mutually beneficial evenings discussing international affairs. It was not unusual for our conversations to run to 3 or 4 hours.

We approached policy issues differently. I tended to take a Realpolitik view, which is to say that I tried to reach conclusions based on the power relationships of a given situation. I attempted to assess how American national interest would be affected by a particular decision and to measure what was possible, not simply desirable. To put it another way: I thought it was important to distinguish between what was trueRealismand what one wished to be true. I was distrustful, even dismissive, of applying moral considerations in a field where abstract morality did not seem especially relevant. (I tended to keep in mind Justice Robert H. Jacksons admonition not to follow ones principles over a cliff: the Constitution, he once said, is not a suicide pact.) I certainly didnt believe in moral absolutes that outweighed all other considerations, national well-being foremost among them.

My friend put more emphasis on the place of ethics in foreign policy than I did and was always ready to remind me that without a moral component international affairs would degenerate into a Hobbesian world of all against all, and that in such a world only the bullies and gangsters would prevail. Limits had to come from something other than force, and if power was the only thing restricting policy decisions, there could never be an end to warfare. This was an especially dismal prospect, he pointed out, in a nuclear age. The point of a moral code was to put an internal brake on humankinds naturally aggressive tendencies, and the hope for peace was only possible if everyone agreed to behave according to universally accepted rules. I would reply that without the authority of a transcendent powerthat is, Godprescribing those rules and perhaps a belief in an afterlife where eternal punishment could be meted out to violators, no permanent agreement was possible, only temporary stopgaps devised by fallible human beings. And so we went round and round.

For all our differences, however, we were not only able to have fruitful discussions but also to find broad areas of agreement. The reason, I think, is that neither of us is an absolutist. We had our respective views, but we werent dogmatic about them. Foreign policy, after all, is a field that doesnt lend itself to straightforward black-and-white solutions. There were too many gray areas in which one had to accept uncertainty and to some degree fall back on guesswork. It is not mathematics.

And so my friend acknowledged that, despite his moral concerns, many issues required one to think in terms of power and national interest; he could be as much a Realist as I was when he thought the situation called for it. And I had to concede that without a moral component, foreign policy could be a rotten, blood-drenched business. I confessed that I didnt much like those leaders who thought only in terms of power, with no evidence of compassion. Moral considerations had to enter the picture at some point even if they werent the primary motivation for policy decisions. Because we were able to find so many points of overlap, our conversations didnt go round and round forever. Instead, after talking things through, we frequently found that we agreed on a number of questions, an ideal blending of Realism and morality.

But one subject where agreement proved to be impossible was on the impact of Henry Kissinger. He brought our discussions to a screeching halt. Not that we completely abandoned our flexibility: my friend was willing to recognize that Kissinger had made historic contributions (though, as I recall, he gave Richard Nixon more of the credit), and I was hardly about to argue for every decision that Kissinger ever made. Whats more, I didnt like the sometimes weaselly explanations Kissinger himself offered for his own policies. At times, it seemed, he was trying to defend the indefensiblelike approving of the wiretapping of his colleagues at the National Security Council or attempting to reinvolve an exhausted United States in the fighting in Vietnam after the signing of the 1973 treaty that, largely through his own efforts, had given America a way out. But insofar as my friend and I struggled to arrive at an overall assessment of the mans career, it was as if a line had been drawn in the sand. My friend was permanently stationed on one side, I on the other. Nothing that either of us could say would persuade the other to change his mind. In one sense, therefore, this book can be seen as an extension of our discussions from my point of view.

B UT THERE IS a larger and more urgent reason for this book: Kissinger has not held public office since 1977, but I believe his time has come round again, and today we dismiss or ignore him at our peril. He is more than a figure out of history. He is a philosopher of international relations who has much to teach us about how the modern world worksand often doesnt. His arguments for his brand of Realismthinking in terms of national interest and a balance of poweroffer the possibility of rationality, coherence, and a necessary long-term perspective at a time when all three of these qualities seem to be in short supply.

Whatever else it did, the Cold War provided coherence of a kind: the United States was faced with an implacable enemy, armed with nuclear weapons and an aggressive global ideology that compelled American policymakers to devise a basic strategy for their planning. For all the mistakes made at that time, George Kennans policy of containment worked for more than four decades. The United States won the Cold War.

For a brief moment after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it seemed that a different kind of coherence was possible: Americas role had become to foster the inevitable expansion of democracy around the world, sometimes by force. Peoples with different cultures and different values would be grateful for Washingtons interventions; they would greet our invading troops with flowers and candy. The United States was the indispensable nation, destined to lead. With the many disappointments that have occurred in the Middle East and elsewhere, this mission has obviously failed. Yet nothing has been found to replace it. How should America define its place in the world?

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World»

Look at similar books to The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Inevitability of Tragedy: Henry Kissinger and His World and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.