• Complain

Emerson Ralph Waldo - Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock

Here you can read online Emerson Ralph Waldo - Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2014, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Emerson Ralph Waldo Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock

Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Introduction: drawing a new circle -- The wilde-er side of life -- Accomplices in murder -- I dont like murderers -- Little deaths -- The time to make up your mind about people is never -- But may I trust you? -- Silence and stasis -- Talking vs. living -- Two things to ponder -- The dark side of the moon -- Scotties dream, Judys plan, Madeleines revenge -- Never again? -- A loveless world -- Birds of a feather -- A mothers love -- Every story has an ending -- Conclusion: Emerson, film, Hitchcock.

Emerson Ralph Waldo: author's other books


Who wrote Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Must We Kill the Thing We Love?
FILM AND CULTURE
John Belton, Editor
FILM AND CULTURE
A series of Columbia University Press
Edited by John Belton
For the list of titles in this series, see .
MUST WE
KILL THE
THING
WE LOVE?
Emersonian Perfectionism and the Films of Alfred Hitchcock
William Rothman
Picture 1 Columbia University Press New York
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2014 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-53730-8
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Rothman, William.
Must we kill the thing we love? : Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock / William Rothman.
pages cm (Film and culture)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-231-16602-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-231-16603-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-231-53730-8 (ebook)
1. Hitchcock, Alfred, 18991980Criticism and interpretation. 2. Redemption in motion pictures. 3. Emerson, Ralph Waldo, 18031882Influence. I. Title.
PN1998.3.H58R683 2014
791.430233092dc23
2013038575
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
COVER PHOTO: AF archive / Alamy
COVER DESIGN: Milenda Nanok Lee
References to websites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared.
For Stanley Cavell
Contents
I wrote HitchcockThe Murderous Gaze more than thirty years ago. During that time I was teaching at Harvard and in almost daily conversation with Stanley Cavell, who was completing Pursuits of Happiness, his seminal study of the Hollywood genre he calls the comedy of remarriage (It Happened One Night [Frank Capra, 1934], The Awful Truth [Leo McCarey, 1937], Bringing Up Baby [Howard Hawks, 1938], His Girl Friday [Howard Hawks, 1940], The Philadelphia Story [George Cukor, 1940], The Lady Eve [Preston Sturges, 1941), Adams Rib [George Cukor, 1948]).
Although The Murderous Gaze approaches Hitchcocks films primarily through the prism of authorship, it notes that the Hitchcock thriller can also be viewed as a genre, or perhaps a cluster of closely related genres, comparable to the comedy of remarriage or the melodrama of the unknown woman. As Cavells own essay on North by Northwest demonstrates, Hitchcock thrillers share the concerns of the genres he studied. And there are differences that can be charted. In the Hitchcock thrillers that revolve around a girl-at-the-threshold-of-womanhood, for example, the narrative charts the stages of a womans education, just as in remarriage comedies. And that education goes hand in glove with the development of a romantic relationship.
In comedies of remarriage a woman and a man pursue happiness not by overcoming societal obstacles to their marriage, as in classical comedies, but by overcoming obstacles internal to their relationship, obstacles that are between and within themselves, obstacles they cannot overcome without achieving a radically changed perspective. These Hollywood movies present women and men as equals, as having an equal right to pursue happiness and as being equal spiritually or, we might say, morallyequal in their powers of imagination and thinking and in their capacity to cultivate the better angels of their nature. What is at issue in such films is not simply whether the leading woman and man will marry, or remarry, but whether the kind of marriage they create together will be a relationship worth having, one that enables them, as individuals and as a couple, to embrace every day and every night in a spirit of adventurea kind of marriage exemplified by Nick and Nora (William Powell and Myrna Loy) in The Thin Man (W. S. Van Dyke, 1934), another landmark film made the same year as It Happened One Night, the earliest of the films Pursuits of Happiness scrutinizes. Hence comedies of remarriage pose, and address, a philosophical question about marriage itself. What is marriage? What, if anything, validates or legitimates a marriage, if a couple can be married according to the church and the laws of the state and yet, by the higher standards of the comedy of remarriage, not have a true marriage?
The Philadelphia Story renders explicit that this question about marriage is also a question about what it is to be human, a question about human relationships in general, a question about community and, as such, a question for, and about, America. Implicitly advocating Americas joining the war against fascism already raging in Europe at the time of its release, The Philadelphia Story is a summary statement as to what makes America worth fighting for, what is worth preserving in its heritage. In the comedy of remarriage a woman and man seek, and achieve, a conversation of equalsa relationship with each other, at once private and public, based on mutual trustthat can serve as a model of community and thus as an inspiration for America in its own quest to form a more perfect union.
What is worth fighting for, The Philadelphia Story declares, is not America as it is (as the wartime documentary series Why We Fight was later to assert, whitewashing reality in a way Hollywood romantic comedies of the 1930s refrained from doing). America as it is, The Philadelphia Story asserts (as do all the romantic comedies Cavell studies), is a place where the likes of George Kittredgethe phony man of the people trumpeted by cynical Sidney Kidds media empirepasses for a great American. Americas promise has not yet been fully realized. America has not yet become America. And yet, these romantic comedies affirm, this unattained America, as Ralph Waldo Emerson calls it, is still attainable. The dream of a more perfect union was still alive in 1930s America, though imperiled, as it was in Emersons time, when, as he wrote, the moral scourge of slavery was keeping America from taking a step toward becoming America. (The dream is still alive todayand still in peril.)
The remarriage comedies Cavell celebrates are grand entertainments that gave pleasure to viewers living through dark times, but they also entered into a serious conversation with their culture that set a high standard of moral purpose. Their commitment to channeling the awesome power of film to help America and Americans to awaken, to change, was not confined to a single genre, a point Cavell fleshes out in
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock»

Look at similar books to Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock»

Discussion, reviews of the book Must we kill the thing we love?: Emersonian perfectionism and the films of Alfred Hitchcock and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.