• Complain

W. Joseph Campbell - Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections

Here you can read online W. Joseph Campbell - Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Berkeley, year: 2020, publisher: California University Press, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

W. Joseph Campbell Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections
  • Book:
    Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    California University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • City:
    Berkeley
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A sweeping look at the messy and contentious past of US presidential pre-election polls and why they arent as reliable as we think. Donald Trumps unexpected victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential election brought sweeping criticism of election polls and poll-based statistical forecasts, which had signaled that Hillary Clinton would win the White House. Surprise ran deep in 2016, but it was not unprecedented. Lost in a Gallup examines in lively and engaging fashion the history of polling flops, epic upsets, unforeseen landslides, and exit poll fiascoes in American presidential elections. Drawing on archival collections and contemporaneous sources, W. Joseph Campbell presents insights on notable pollsters of the past, including George Gallup, Elmo Roper, Archibald Crossley, Warren Mitofsky, and Louis Harris. The story is one of media failure, too, as journalists invariably take their lead from polls in crafting campaign narratives. Lost in a Gallup describes how numerous prominent journalists-including Edward R. Murrow, Jimmy Breslin, Mike Royko, Christopher Hitchens, and Haynes Johnson-were outspoken poll-bashers and critics. In assessing pollings messy, uneven, and controversial past, Campbell emphasizes that although election polls are not always wrong, their inherent drawbacks invite skepticism and wariness. Readers will come away better prepared to weigh the efficacy and value of pre-election polls in presidential races, the most important of all American elections.

W. Joseph Campbell: author's other books


Who wrote Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
LOST IN A GALLUP The publisher and the University of California Press - photo 1
LOST IN A GALLUP

The publisher and the University of California Press Foundation gratefully acknowledge the generous support of the Barbara S. Isgur Endowment Fund in Public Affairs.

ALSO BY W. JOSEPH CAMPBELL

Getting It Wrong: Debunking the Greatest Myths in American Journalism

1995: The Year the Future Began

The Year That Defined American Journalism: 1897 and the Clash of Paradigms

Yellow Journalism: Puncturing the Myths, Defining the Legacies

The Spanish-American War: American Wars and Media in Primary Documents

The Emergent Independent Press in Benin and Cte dIvoire: From Voice of the State to Advocate of Democracy

LOST IN A GALLUP
POLLING FAILURE IN U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

W. Joseph Campbell

Picture 2

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS

University of California Press

Oakland, California

2020 by W. Joseph Campbell

Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file at the Library of Congress.

ISBN 978-0-520-30096-5 (cloth : alk. paper)

ISBN 978-0-520-97213-1 (ebook)

Manufactured in the United States of America

28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

To Ann-Marie

To start with, political polling is inherently imperfect.

Michael Barone in Wall Street Journal (Are the polls accurate?), October 22, 2008

The only crime in this business is to be on the wrong side of a prediction.

George H. Gallup, quoted in New York Herald-Tribune, November 9, 1952

The interaction between journalists and polls is a troubled union.

Karlyn Keene, managing editor, Public Opinion Magazine, quoted in New York Times, November 10, 1988

Polls get plenty of respect. But they get very little affection.

Andrew Kohut, presidential address, American Association for Public Opinion Research, 1995

Polls go wrong, and thats all there is to it.

James Farley, Democratic National Committee chair, in Behind the Ballots (1938), 323

CONTENTS
FIGURES, TABLES, AND BOXES
FIGURES
TABLES
BOXES
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Researching this book took me to archival collections in quite a few places and brought me in touch with many generous people. Notable among them was the staff at the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center at the University of Connecticut at Storrs, home to important collections of papers of the pollsters Archibald M. Crossley, Warren J. Mitofsky, and Elmo Roper. I am grateful for the courtesy and assistance of personnel there, including Nicholas Hurley, Matthew Slowik, and Trisha Sundman, and the university archivist, Betty Pittman.

My research into polls, pollsters, and journalists took me to presidential libraries as well. Paul Sparrow, Virginia Lewick, and their colleagues at the Franklin D. Roosevelt library were welcoming and most helpful. So, too, were Randy Sowell and his colleagues at the Harry S. Truman library, and Kevin Bailey at the Dwight D. Eisenhower library.

The Library of Congress in Washington, DC, is an exceptional research institution and on this and other book projects I benefited from the insights, expertise, and courtesy of Georgia M. Higley, Arlene Balkansky, Jeff Flannery, and their colleagues. Rick Mastroianni of the now-closed Newseum in Washington was welcoming and generous with his time in early phases of my research. Matthew Turi of the special collections staff at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was helpful as I worked through the Louis Harris papers. Lin Fredericksen and her colleagues were accommodating during my review of the Alf Landon papers at the Kansas Historical Society in Topeka.

My research trips were supported by the generosity of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (which also considers polling issues from time to time at its annual conferences) and my academic home, the School of Communication at American University. I am most grateful to Jennifer McGill, the executive director of AEJMC, and to her gracious colleague, Lillian Coleman, for the research grant that helped enable my travels. Jeff Rutenbeck, the former dean of the universitys School of Communication, was unstinting in supporting my research, for which I am deeply grateful. My colleagues at American, including Laura DeNardis and Amy Eisman, were also very supportive, and I enjoyed and benefited from conversations with them.

Graduate assistants made important contributions to the research. Special thanks goes to Kip Dooley for his diligence, suggestions, and the hours he spent at the Library of Congress. Kurt Wirth, another graduate assistant, was quite helpful in latter stages of the project. Ruxandra Giura, a talented data journalist, made important contributionsas she has on several of my book projects. Her willingness to field my inquiries patiently and with courtesy was much appreciated.

Shane Hickey of American Universitys interlibrary loan staff did outstanding work in locating obscure and elusive material important to this project. Chris Lewis at the universitys Bender Library provided important guidance in my tracking down decades-old audio files of programs such as those of George Gallups appearance on Meet the Press. Gallups papers are housed at the University of Iowas special collections, where I spent a number of productive days.

The support and suggestions of Reed Malcolm, a senior editor at University of California Press, were vital to this books coming together. It was a pleasure to collaborate with Reed on this, my fourth book project with the press. His colleagues Dore Brown, Peter Perez, and Archna Patel were wonderful to work with.

The press arranged for Madeleine Adams to copyedit the book and her efforts were outstanding. I am grateful for her scrutiny, patience, talents, and good cheer.

Dominic Lusinchi, who has done outstanding work on the sociology and history of election polling, offered valuable observations on early versions of the manuscript. Joel Best read the near-final manuscript closely and provided important suggestions.

I enjoyed my talks with pollsters and polling experts, especially those conversations with Charles Franklin, director of the Marquette University Law School poll; Spencer Kimball, director of the Emerson College poll; Samuel Wang of the Princeton Election Consortium; and Tim Johnson, a past president of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, or AAPOR. Survey research is a notably innovative field that also is wrestling with profound challenges, including the steep decline in participation by would-be poll respondents. AAPOR conferences offered important insights into the state of contemporary opinion polling and, to be sure, into the performance of polls in the 2016 presidential election.

My wife, Ann-Marie Regan, was patient and supportive as I researched and wrote this book. She is a Connecticut native and especially enjoyed joining me on research trips to Storrs. It is to Ann-Marie this book is dedicated.

Introduction
Of Pollsters, Journalists, and Presidential Elections

It was the eve of the 2016 presidential election, and Natalie Jackson, senior polling editor for the Huffington Post, seemed supremely confident. She pegged Hillary Clinton as the near-certain winner. So did many pollsters, analysts, pundits, and journalists. But Jackson had ample data to support her confidence. Or so she thought.

Jackson coordinated the Huffington Post s polls-based statistical model that was designed to forecast the elections outcome. She did not equivocate in her final analysis. The HuffPost presidential forecast model, she wrote, gives Democrat Hillary Clinton a 98.2 percent chance of winning the presidency. Republican Donald Trump has essentially no path to an Electoral College victory. Clintons win will be substantial, but not overwhelming. The model projects that shell garner 323 electoral votes to Trumps 215. Clinton, she added, should fairly easily hold onto Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and stood better than an 80 percent chance of carrying Florida and North Carolina.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections»

Look at similar books to Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections»

Discussion, reviews of the book Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.