• Complain

Robert H. Watrel - Atlas of the 2016 Elections

Here you can read online Robert H. Watrel - Atlas of the 2016 Elections full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Atlas of the 2016 Elections
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Atlas of the 2016 Elections: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Atlas of the 2016 Elections" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The 2016 presidential election was one of the most dramatic upsets in US political history. Virtually all pre-election polls indicated Democrat Hillary Clinton ahead of Republican Donald Trump in the popular vote and Electoral College. The Atlas of the 2016 Elections explains the surprising Trump victory with a series of unique maps unleashing the illustrative power of cartography and the explanatory power of history and political geography. The contributorsa balanced mix of geographers, political scientists, and historiansprovide a comprehensive examination of the entire gamut of the election process from the primary campaigns and nominating conventions to the fall campaign and final results. In addition to the presidential election, the Atlas has full coverage of other important races, including United States Senate and House of Representatives, state races, and local and state referendum. Illustrated with over 100 meticulously drawn full-color maps, the Atlas will be an essential reference and a fascinating resource for pundits, voters, campaign staffs, and political junkies alike.

Robert H. Watrel: author's other books


Who wrote Atlas of the 2016 Elections? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Atlas of the 2016 Elections — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Atlas of the 2016 Elections" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS

John Agnew is professor of geography at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Ben Anderstone is a political consultant based in Seattle, Washington.

J. Clark Archer is professor of geography, University of NebraskaLincoln.

Jill A. Archer is a retired media specialist, Lincoln Public Schools, Lincoln, Nebraska.

Matthew Balentine is a graduate student of geography at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro.

William Berentsen is professor of geography at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Jason Combs is professor of geography at the University of Nebraska at Kearney.

Jeffrey Crump is professor in the Housing Studies Program at the University of Minnesota.

Carl T. Dahlman is professor of geography at Miami University, Oxford.

Fiona M. Davidson is associate professor of geography at the University of Arkansas.

Lisa M. DeChano-Cook is associate professor of geography at Western Michigan University.

Matthew Engel is adjunct lecturer of geography at the University of Nebraska at Kearney.

Richard L. Engstrom is professor emeritus of political science at the University of New Orleans and research associate at the Center for the Study of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Social Sciences at Duke University.

Erin H. Fouberg is professor of geography at Northern State University.

Kenneth French is assistant professor of geography at the University of WisconsinParkside.

Megan A. Gall is a social scientist at the Voting Rights Project, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC.

Mark Graham is professor of Internet geography, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, and Alan Turing Institute, London.

Scott Hale is a senior data scientist at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, and Alan Turing Institute, London.

John Heppen is professor of geography at the University of WisconsinRiver Falls.

Ashley M. Hitt is an undergraduate student in geography at the University of Oklahoma.

Kimberly K. Johnson is a graduate student in geography at the University of Oklahoma.

Ron Johnston is professor of geography at the University of Bristol, UK.

Kelvyn Jones is professor of geography at the University of Bristol, UK.

Larry Knopp is professor of geography at the University of Washington, Tacoma.

Jonathan Leib is professor of geography at Old Dominion University.

Samuel Loftsgaarden is a geography student at the University of WisconsinEau Claire.

Chris Maier is adjunct professor of geography at South Dakota State University.

David Manley is professor of geographer at the University of Bristol, UK.

Kenneth C. Martis is professor of geography at West Virginia University.

Daniel A. McGowin is assistant professor of geography at Jacksonville State University.

Richard L. Morrill is emeritus professor of geography at the University of Washington.

Jennifer L. Patin is a development officer at the Voting Rights Project, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC.

Tony Robinson is associate professor of political science at the University of Colorado at Denver.

Fred M. Shelley is professor of geography at the University of Oklahoma.

Monica Stephens is assistant professor of geography at SUNY at Buffalo.

Li Tong is a graduate student of geography at SUNY at Buffalo.

Robert H. Watrel is associate professor of geography at South Dakota State University.

Gerald R. Webster is professor of geography at the University of Wyoming.

Katie Weichelt is adjunct professor of geography at the University of WisconsinEau Claire.

Ryan Weichelt is associate professor of geography at the University of WisconsinEau Claire.

Lindy Westenhoff is a graduate student in geography at the University of Wyoming.

Levi John Wolf is a graduate student at the School of Geographical Sciences & Urban Planning, Arizona State University.

INTRODUCTION ROBERT H WATREL AND ERIN H FOUBERG R epublican nominee - photo 1
INTRODUCTION ROBERT H WATREL AND ERIN H FOUBERG R epublican nominee - photo 2
INTRODUCTION

ROBERT H. WATREL AND ERIN H. FOUBERG

R epublican nominee Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election by carrying thirty states that gave him 306 of the 538 votes in the Electoral College. Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton won almost 2.9 million more popular votes than Trump, with a surplus of votes in a few of the more populous states she carried, including a surplus of more than 4.2 million votes in California. The election came down to a few key swing states where the race was incredibly tight: Michigan (Trump won by 10,704 votes: 47.6 percent to Clintons 47.4 percent), Wisconsin (Trump won by 22,748 votes: 47.8 percent to Clintons 47 percent), and Pennsylvania (Trump won by 44,292 votes: 48.8 percent to Clintons 47.6 percent). These three states had gone to the Democratic presidential candidate since Bill Clinton won them in 1992, but on November 8, 2016, they went to Republican Donald Trump.

Clinton swayed fewer voters to get out and vote than Barack Obama did in swing states in 2012 and 2008. While the election shocked many pundits and rattled pollsters, it came down, as every election whether national, state, or local does, to voter turnout. Trumps campaign rallies inspired and compelled voters to the polls, and Clintons campaign did not as effectively compel voter turnout where she needed it most.

County scale analysis of the map shows the stark contrast between rural Republican areas mapped in red and urban Democratic areas mapped in blue. Trump is proud of how much acreage he won on the county scale map, having passed out color copies of the county scale map to reporters in April and bringing a framed color poster-sized map into the West Wing in May (Bowden 2017). While Trump won the rural vote, careful inspection of the county scale map shows Clinton carried counties with large minority populations, including Native Americans living on reservations in the Southwest and Great Plains, along the Mexican border, and in the Mississippi Delta. While the acreage Clinton won was much smaller than Trumps, Clinton won huge numbers of votes in acreage mapped in blue, winning more than 80 percent of the vote in the cities of Boston, New York, and San Francisco and more than 90 percent of the vote in Washington, DC.

THE 2016 UNITED STATES ELECTIONS

Contributors to this atlas analyze the primaries leading up to the US presidential election, the campaigns, and the US presidential election from a political geography perspective. Analysis of the geography of primaries votes reveals splits within both major parties. Hillary Clinton ran as a moderate Democrat relative to Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders. Trump ran as an outsider in the Republican primaries relative to career politician and party loyalist Ted Cruz.

Both parties had contentious primaries that revealed the geographies of the splits within the parties. Sanders found success in states with open primaries, where independents (and in some cases Republicans) could vote in Democratic primaries, and in states with caucuses, where voters are inspired enough by their candidate to attend a caucus. Sanders carried progressive states and counties and fared well in university towns and counties. Clinton won consistently in closed primaries and among the traditional Democratic base, including urban and minority voters.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Atlas of the 2016 Elections»

Look at similar books to Atlas of the 2016 Elections. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Atlas of the 2016 Elections»

Discussion, reviews of the book Atlas of the 2016 Elections and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.