• Complain

Phillip Norton - Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents

Here you can read online Phillip Norton - Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Lexington, year: 1993, publisher: University Press of Kentucky, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Phillip Norton Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents
  • Book:
    Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University Press of Kentucky
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1993
  • City:
    Lexington
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The British House of Commons has entered a period of substantial change, moving from a state of party cohesion and party leadership toward a more individualistic and active policy-making role. In the dynamic look at the British Parliament and its members, Philip Norton and David M. Wood highlight that change to more intensive constituency response and service on the part of individual members.
Like members of the U.S. Congress, British Members of Parliament (MPs) are elected to represent geographical districts. The relationship between the MP and the constituency in Britain has become more important in recent years, but the major changes that have occurred in the relationship since the late 1960s have not been matched by extensive scholarly study. Some pathbreaking work has been done on the subject, but it remains overshadowed by the wealth of material focusing on MPs activities within the legislative chambers at Westminster. This volume seeks to fill the gap by sketching and assessing the electoral significance of the MPs constituency work and the broader political ramifications for the workings of the British Parliament. Its findings allow the MP to be seen in full.
Norton and Wood argue that the constituency role has gained in importance in recent decades as MPs have become more career-oriented than their forerunners in mid-century. But a by-product of greater professionalism and careerism has been an expanded job description that may take MPs time and energies away from playing a more effective role in helping to shape the broader policy alternatives for the United Kingdom.

Phillip Norton: author's other books


Who wrote Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Comparative Legislative Studies
Malcolm E. Jewell, Editor
BACK FROM
WESTMINSTER
British Members of
Parliament and
Their Constituents
Philip Norton
David M. Wood
Copyright 1993 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the - photo 1
Copyright 1993 by The University Press of Kentucky
Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth,
serving Bellarmine College, Berea College, Centre
College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University,
The Filson Club, Georgetown College, Kentucky
Historical Society, Kentucky State University,
Morehead State University, Murray State University,
Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University,
University of Kentucky, University of Louisville,
and Western Kentucky University.
Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Norton, Philip.
Back from Westminster : British members of Parliament and their constituents / Philip Norton and David M. Wood.
p.cm.(Comparative legislative studies series)
Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index.
ISBN 0-8131-1834-4
1. Great Britain. Parliament. House of CommonsConstituent communication. 2. Great BritainPolitics and government1945I. Wood, David M. (David Michael), 1934. II. Title. III. Series.
JN673.N58 1993
328.410731dc20 93-14766
This book is printed on recycled acid-free paper meeting the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. Picture 2
Contents
Preface
It was the nineteenth-century politician John Bright who described England as the mother of parliaments. By virtue of its seniority in the family of parliaments, the British Parliament is both well known and often taken as an exemplar of a particular type of legislature. It has been the subject of considerable study. However, this study has tended to be of the institution of Parliament, rather than of parliamentarians. Insofar as students have been interested in the behavior of parliamentarians, that interest has been relatively recent and narrow in focus. The concentration has been on the relationship between Members of Parliament (MPs) and those of their number who form the government. The focus on legislative-executive relations is an important one, but it neglects another important dimension of parliamentary behavior: the relationship between MPs and their constituents.
Like members of the U.S. Congress, British Members of Parliament are elected to represent defined geographical districts. Like members of Congress, they face in two directions politically: toward Westminster and national affairs and toward their constituency and its local concerns and needs. The two faces are not mutually exclusive; they are analytically separable and each makes substantial, and different, demands on the legislators time, resources, and intellectual energy.
The relationship between the MP and the constituency in Britain has become more important in recent years, but changes in the relationship since the late 1960s have not been matched by extensive scholarly study. Some pathbreaking work has been done on the subject, but it remains overshadowed by the wealth of material focusing on the Westminster activities of MPs. This volume seeks to fill the gap by sketching and assessing the political, including the electoral, significance of the MPs other face. We believe that our findings allow the British Member of Parliament to be seen in full.
This work brings together the interests of both authors and builds on work we have already done both individually and jointly. In the early 1980s Norton made note of the fact that the volume of activity by MPs in corresponding with ministers on behalf of the needs of their individual constituents had been growing by leaps and bounds. Later in the decade Wood called attention to the activities MPs undertook on behalf of their constituents needs, especially those involving local economic interests.
Our first collaborative venture began in 1987 when Wood was a visiting scholar in the Hull University Politics Department, and it led to a study of what, if any, electoral payoff MPs derived from their constituency activities. Our finding that first-term incumbents achieved significantly better results than other candidates prompted further research. Our initial findings were published in article form in two journals, Parliamentary Affairs and Political Studies, and form the basis of part of this volume. The volume itself forms the completion of our wider study.
For advice and comments on the manuscript, we are especially grateful to Malcolm Jewell, the general editor of the series in which it appears. Financial and other assistance to David Wood in two research trips to England is gratefully acknowledged at the beginning of . Wood wishes to give particular thanks to the following individuals for their advice and assistance as the research progressed: Mark Hagger, Thad Brown, Wang Sik Kim, Yogesh Grover, Eric Anderson, and Brad Jones.
During the course of our research we have both benefited from the advice and comments of colleagues in the discipline of political science. We are grateful to them and to those politicians and other knowledgeables who kindly gave of their time to be interviewed. They have strengthened our work enormously. Responsibility for any errors or omissions rests solely with us.
1
Introduction
The British Parliament is widely seen as a deliberative body that reflects the diverse political views of the different social classes and geographical areas of the country but that most of the time responds favorably to the initiatives of executive leaders in performing its legislative function (Mezey 1979). Compared with the U.S. Congress, it is seen as a secondary and relatively passive policy-making body (Loewenberg and Patterson 1979).
The main reason that observers of the British Parliament assign it a relatively limited policy-making role is the dominance within the legislative arena of the two leading political parties, one or the other of which almost invariably will hold a majority in the House of Commons (Rose 1986). Indeed, Britain has been characterized as one of the few countries to exhibit both the format and the properties of a two-party system (Sartori 1976, 185). Possession of a parliamentary majority, coupled with strong party discipline (found in both parties whether in the majority or in opposition), allows the executive, itself comprising the leadership of the majority party, to control most significant activity in the House of Commons. This assures it of the adoption of its legislative agenda through cohesive majority party voting in divisions (roll call votes). A corollary of this is that the role of the individual backbench Member of Parliament (MP), whether of the majority or opposition party, is a weak one in policy-making terms.
The transatlantic contrast is stark. In both the Senate and the House of Representatives, party cohesion is weak, and, in any event, congressional party leadership is entirely separate from the executive branch. Congress has the leadership that allows it to challenge policy brought forward by the executive. In Parliament, the equivalent leadership is the executive. Congressional parties are not bound to support the executive leadership in roll call voting or other policy-related activity as are the members of the majority party in the House of Commons. In Congress, party votes (90 percent or more of the members of one party voting against 90 percent or more of members of the other) are the exception; in the House of Commons, they are the rule.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents»

Look at similar books to Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents»

Discussion, reviews of the book Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.