• Complain

Stansfield Turner - Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons

Here you can read online Stansfield Turner - Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: London, year: 1997, publisher: Routledge, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Stansfield Turner Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons
  • Book:
    Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1997
  • City:
    London
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Cold War may be over, but you wouldnt know it from the tens of thousands of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons of mass destruction still held by Russia, the United States, and other world powers. Arguing that the time has come to dispense with incremental approaches to arms control, Admiral Stansfield Turner, the former head of the CIA and an experienced senior military commander, proposes a practical yet safe plan?strategic escrow?that would move the world into a new and secure millennium. The paperback edition of this widely acclaimed work has been updated to consider the implications of such a build-down if applied to non-nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Specifically, Admiral Turner details how a plan for weapons reduction could be carried out for biological and chemical weapons and what tactical and strategic differences exist between de-escalation of nuclear and non-nuclear weapons.

Stansfield Turner: author's other books


Who wrote Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Other books by Stansfield Turner
Secrecy and Democracy The CIA in Transition
Terrorism and Democracy
Caging the Genies
Caging the Genies
A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons
Stansfield Turner
First published 1999 by Westview Press Published 2018 by Routledge 711 Third - photo 1
First published 1999 by Westview Press
Published 2018 by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Turner, Stansfield, 1923
Caging the genies: a workable solution for nuclear, chemical, and
biological weapons / Stansfield Turner. 2nd ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8133-6677-1
1. Weapons of mass destruction. 2. Arms control. 3. No first use
(Nuclear strategy). 4. Security, International. I. Turner,
Stansfield, 1923- Caging the nuclear genie. II. Title.
U793.T87 1999
327.1'747dc21
99-13854
CIP
ISBN 13: 978-0-8133-6677-7 (pbk)
In memory of my parents, Wilhelmina and Oliver,
whose gift of example and whose love and encouragement
gave me the confidence always to reach a little higher;
and to my brother Twain, whose shortness of life forced me
to search for deeper meaning in my own
Contents
  1. i
  2. xvii
Guide
Since the original publication of this book in September 1997, concern for the threat that biological and chemical weapons pose has grown. This second edition of Caging the Nuclear Genie, retitled Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons, addresses that concern. Chemical and biological weapons are similar enough to nuclear weapons that the three are commonly grouped in a single category: weapons of mass destruction. I found, then, in laying out the problems these weapons pose and the solutions applicable to them, that the structure for dealing with nuclear weapons was quite adequate for dealing with the others also. Thus, analyses of chemical and biological weapons are integrated throughout the text as appropriate.
The original book would not have been feasible without generous grants from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. In addition to being most grateful for that support, I am appreciative of the advice and encouragement there of David Speedie and the late McGeorge Bundy. "Mac's" perceptive work in the area of nuclear weapons was a constant guide and benchmark.
I am also very grateful to the W. Alton Jones Foundation for the grant that gave this project its initial momentum and to George Perkovich for his helpful advice from beginning to end.
This second edition was made possible by The Fourth Freedom Foundation, which provided a generous grant in support of it.
The Norwegian Nobel Institute of Peace kindly provided me a Senior Research Fellowship and a stimulating environment in which to pursue the original effort for six months. They assembled a diverse group to critique the work in progress, including Christoph Bertram of Hamburg and Pavel Baeev of Moscow. Geir Lundestad and Odd Arne Westad of the Nobel Institute offered helpful comments throughout my stay in Oslo.
John Chipman and Rose Gottemoeller of the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London were generous in bringing together a seminar to review an extended outline of the book. That group included some of the most prominent thinkers in this area, including Sir Michael Howard and Lawrence Freedman. I am most grateful to all of them for taking so much of their time.
The Peace Research Institute of Oslo also was kind in organizing a helpful seminar discussion that included Magne Barthe, Nils Petter Gleditsch, and Robert Bathurst.
I have been fortunate in having had assistance with research from a number of individuals during a span of four years. Hanno Kirk, Howard Diamond, Matt Didaleusky, and Jason Pate were able to devote the most time to it and were invaluable both for the facts they uncovered and the advice they proffered. Kurt Wendt, Zach Patrick, Milton Leitenberg, Garrett Ogden, Alex Slesar, and Peter Copeland also provided wonderful support. For this second edition of the book, Jason Pate and Hanno Kirk continued to provide major help and were joined by Erik Leklem, whose help was also most valuable.
Many individuals were kind enough to meet with me and offer suggestions: Robert McNamara, Bill Perry, and Dick Cheney, former secretaries of defense; Admiral Henry Chiles, then commander in chief of the U.S. Strategic Command; General Lee Butler, former commander in chief of the U.S. Strategic Command; Michael Nacht, A1 Lieberman, and Fred Nyland of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; Janne Nolan, John Steinbrunner, Bill Kauffman, and Bruce Blair of the Brookings Institution; Roger Molander, Bruno Augenstein, and Jim Digby of the RAND Corporation; Robert Piacesi and Paul Garvin of G&P Associates, Inc.; Sergei Rogov of the Institute of the USA and Canada Studies in Moscow; James Jacobs of the Federal Emergency Management Agency; Steve Hadley, formerly of the Department of Defense; Bruce Russett and Gaddis Smith of Yale University; Father Brian Hehir of Harvard University; Brigadier Generals Jim Mathers and Lance Lord and Colonels Bob Kehler and Jack Byrnes of the U.S. Space Command; Major General Gary Curtin and Brigadier General Thomas Neary of the U.S. Strategic Command; Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, former chief of naval operations; Fred Ikle, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Michael Mazaar of the Center for Strategic and International Studies; Harald Mller of the Peace Research Institute, Frankfurt; Spurgeon Keeny of the Arms Control Association; George Questor, Mancur Olson, Thomas Schelling, Ivo Daalder, and Steve Fetter of the University of Maryland; Colonel Ronald Williams of the Defense Special Weapons Agency; and Andrew Marshall and Frank Miller of the U.S. Department of Defense. I am particularly indebted to former President Jimmy Carter not only for his spending time to give me very important advice on the thrust of the book but also for reading and commenting on portions of it.
Ted Postol of MIT not only tutored me on the lethality of nuclear weapons but also did numerous calculations at my request. Kosta Tsipis, also of MIT, provided invaluable advice as to my use of the study he directed, "Nuclear CrashThe U.S. Economy After Small Nuclear Attacks."
I imposed upon many friends to read and make suggestions on various drafts. Their assistance in this was invaluable, both because they agreed and because they disagreed: Robert Monroe, Donald Rivkin, John Keeley, John Kieley, Ken Pollack, John Lewis Gaddis, Louis Halle, Robert O'Connell, John Rhinelander, Alton Frye, Eliot Cohen, Forrest Morgan, David Bradley, Richard Harza, Jeffrey Zink, Ove and Sjur Tjelta, George Thibault, Nordau Goodman, Stevan Dedijer, Mike Pocalyko, John Holdren, David Tall, Alvin Weinberg, Frank Tatum, Felix Moos, Staser Holcomb, Steve Nichalson, Alan Cranston, Charles Battaglia, David Rosenberg, Winn Price, William Karzas, Paul Grimes, Roger Ingle, Lynn Eden, and John Opel. This outpouring of support for finding ways to grapple with the vexing issues that nuclear weapons present has overwhelmed me. Having been shameless in asking for such assistance, I apologize if I have inadvertently overlooked someone upon whom I imposed.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons»

Look at similar books to Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons»

Discussion, reviews of the book Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Weapons and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.