• Complain

Alan Levinovitz - The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat

Here you can read online Alan Levinovitz - The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2015, publisher: Regan Arts., genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Regan Arts.
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

An incendiary work of science journalism debunking the myths that dominate the American diet and showing readers how to stop feeling guilty and start loving their food againsure to ignite controversy over our obsession with what it means to eat right.
FREE YOURSELF FROM ANXIETY ABOUT WHAT YOU EAT
Gluten. Salt. Sugar. Fat. These are the villains of the American dietor so a host of doctors and nutritionists would have you believe. But the science is far from settled and we are racing to eliminate wheat and corn syrup from our diets because weve been lied to. The truth is that almost all of us can put the buns back on our burgers and be just fine.
Remember when butter was the enemy? Now its good for you. You may have lived through times when the Atkins Diet was good, then bad, then good again; you may have wondered why all your friends cut down on salt or went Paleo; and you might even be thinking about cutting out wheat products from your own diet.
For readers suffering from dietary whiplash, The Gluten Lie is the answer. Scientists and physicians know shockingly little about proper nutrition that they didnt know a thousand years ago, even though Americans spend billions of dollars and countless hours obsessing over eating right.
In this groundbreaking work, Alan Levinovitz takes on bestselling physicians and dietitians, exposing the myths behind how we come to believe which foods are good and which are badand pointing the way to a truly healthful life, free from anxiety about what we eat.

Alan Levinovitz: author's other books


Who wrote The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

The UNpacked Diet, UNpacked Margin Notes

is adapted from Dr. Mark Hymans 10-Day Detox . The list of ailments is the same. It uses nine days instead of ten because nine is a lucky Chinese number.

insecure and vulnerable.

the myth of paradise past.

the implication is that life was safer back then. The age-adjusted risk of dying dropped 60 percent between 1935 and 2010.

as antiestablishment, appealing to people who are frustrated with mainstream medicine.

new research and fails to disclose disagreement in the scientific community about whether and how diet is connected to these problems.

of paradise past and noble savages using unsubstantiated references to healthy traditional cultures. There is no consensus about the extent to which diet plays a role in the health of any of these cultures. Not only that, most accounts of healthy traditional cultures are outdated or anecdotal.

. Excludes the information that snack and candy consumption in America is twice that of almost all other countries. Also fails to mention that overall total food consumption is highest per capita in America.

general health is rarely accurate. Our life spans are longer than ever, and there is considerable scientific debate about supposed increases in conditions like ADHD, autism, and cancer.

are powerful but do not constitute decisive evidence of anything.

of good and evil in which anything associated with industry must be bad.

of modernity.

with an idealized vision of Nature with a capital N.

simple scapegoat to blame for all our health problems.

. Nanoplastic is a real term, but it does not mean small plastic particles. It sure sounds scary, though.

and Big Food = Supervillains!

.

, but there are traces of many things in our bodies that are dangerous at higher doses. The dose makes the poison.

associations made in this paragraph are based on a few in-vitro and animal studies. Establishing facts about what causes cancer in humans requires many human studies and epidemiological studies.

a single study, conducted on primates, with very tentative conclusions.

always make recommendations based on sound science. The Breast Cancer Fund is basing their recommendations on the kind of studies mentioned above.

a study isnt funded by industry doesnt mean it is reliable or free of bias.

levels of BPA are still safe, then this doesnt matter. The highest levels identified in the study still fall well below the FDAs guidelines and even the more conservative EPA limits.

of nonindustry bias. Here are some quotes from the Silent Spring website, illustrating their distrust of scientific methodology and impatience with the scientific process:

[The Silent Spring Institute] decided to create a laboratory of their own.... Their background was social activism, not scienceand that gave them an advantage.

We didnt want science as usual. We didnt want to fund scientists that would go away and then come back with a report ten years later.

in prestigious journals arent always reliable. See the following comment:

participated in the study. The diet lasted for three days.

with MSG and salt, regulatory action, especially when it comes to infant safety, often jumps the gun and creates the illusion of a scientific consensus. In a 2012 press release, the FDA stated that the reason for their BPA ban was abandonment, which means companies had stopped the practice of using BPA in infant bottles. The release included the explicit statement that safety information is not relevant to abandonment.

thing to say containers release chemicals. Its quite another to prove a connection between those chemicals and health problems.

works for PlastiPure, a company with a product line of plastics whose mission is to ensure that estrogenic chemicals will not leach into foods, drinks, and other materials. That doesnt mean his study is wrongbut it does mean we should extend the same skepticism to him that we would to an industry-funded study asserting the safety of plastics.

scientific name means nothing, but it helps to establish expertise and invoke fear of modernity.

because industry denies something doesnt mean the opposite is true.

, the Consumers Union also emphasized that the risks were small.

... True, but who cares? Legal safety levels for chemicals can differ drastically between countries and public health organizations, and routinely have no basis in sound science.

controversial. Many experts have suggested that rates of autism are not, in fact, rising, and better detection and expanded criteria account for the perceived epidemic.

a role... or it could not.

... or it may not.

.

doesnt mean good science. Every link in this sentence is based on a single study, sometimes with very tenuous conclusions.

not causation.

notes that the finding is only a correlation between the amount of BPA in the body and obesity, rather than evidence that one causes the other.

levels tended...

not causation!

likely a coincidence.

irrelevant. These factory workers were breathing in large quantities of styrene. The monotonic fallacyif a lot is bad, a little is also badcomes into play.

harm to the digestive system does not mean that ingesting small amounts of styrene is likely to be harmful.

authorities? Turns out mostly alarmist, unreliable ones. Has your doctor ever mentioned this to you?

generally focus on environmental concerns, not health concerns.

sounds excessive, but only without comparison data from other countries. Like our salt consumption, American bottled water consumption is lower than that of many other countries, including Mexico, Thailand, Italy, Belgium, Germany, the United Arab Emirates, and France.

are not alarming if they have no health implications.

confirmed that the levels were toxic. The dose makes the poison .

allows you to generate custom charts like these. Example: Per capita consumption of cheese from 200009 correlates almost exactly with number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets.

air conditioners nor many vaccines. Fear of modernity, again.

also long been controversial. There is no consensus on the connection between aluminum and Alzheimers.

makes the poison . The dose makes the poison. The dose makes the poison.

leaps that no reputable scientist would ever endorse.

in-vitro study proves nothing.

sodas have not been found to contribute to weight gain, except insofar as those who drink them might also consume more calories.

, thats totally insane.

Blaylock. Remember him from MSG? And government conspiracy chemical trails?

is this a simple correlation, but it also correlates autism with injected aluminum, not aluminum from soda cans.

degrees distract you from focusing on the argument and the science. Amy Yasko is a controversial figure who endorses completely unfounded techniques for curing autism.

sentences dont actually make sense. They just sound scary.

comes from some random website that sells cleansing, detox, natural sleep, and weight-loss supplements.

experienced two or more of these symptoms? If you havent, youre probably superhuman.

and the next are from a naturopathic doctors website. As his sources he cites a book called Staying Healthy with Nutrition, published by Celestial Arts of Berkeley, California, and another book, called Medical Nutrition From Marz, based on the 19th-century philosophy of Nature Cure.

study that examined correlations between BPA and highly subjective variables in three-year-olds, including poor emotional control and inhibition.

mean BPA is toxic to fetuses, infants, and children at current levels of exposure. It means BPA may be toxic at some level of exposure, and further research is warranted.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat»

Look at similar books to The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.