• Complain

Maria Pramaggiore - Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire

Here you can read online Maria Pramaggiore - Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Bloomsbury Academic, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Maria Pramaggiore Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire
  • Book:
    Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Bloomsbury Academic
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Considered by critics to be Stanley Kubricks masterpiece, Barry Lyndon has suffered from scholarly and popular neglect. Maria Pramaggiore argues that one key reason that this film remains unappreciated, even by Kubrick aficionados, is that its transnational and intermedial contexts have not been fully explored. Taking a novel approach, she looks at the film from a transnational perspective -- as a foreign production shot in Ireland and an adaptation of a British novel by an American director about an Irish subject. Pramaggiore argues that, in Barry Lyndon, Kubrick develops his richest philosophical mediation on cinemas capacity to mediate the real and foregrounds films relationship to other technologies of visuality, including painting, photography, and digital media.
By combining extensive research into the films source novel, production and reception with systematic textual analysis and an engagement with several key issues in contemporary academic debate, this work promises not only to make a huge impact in the field of Kubrick studies, but also in 1970s filmmaking, cultural history and transnational film practice.

Maria Pramaggiore: author's other books


Who wrote Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon

Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon

Art, History, and Empire

Maria Pramaggiore

Bloomsbury Academic

An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Inc

Contents I consider myself extremely fortunate to have so many friends and - photo 1

Contents

I consider myself extremely fortunate to have so many friends and colleagues who patiently tolerated my obsession with all things Barry Lyndon, which, at times, has included incessant references to Kubricks work and the oversharing of salacious details surrounding Ryan ONeals career.

First, I thank the archivists and librarians who helped me to see the materials related to Kubricks film. Leith Adams made my 2006 visit to the Warner Brothers archive both enjoyable and productive. Between 2009 and 2013, I was able to visit the Stanley Kubrick Archive at the London College of Communication on numerous occasions. My colleagues there became friends and I thank them profusely for their kindness. Foremost among them are Richard Daniels and Wendy Russell, who inspired me with their love of the archive and gently corrected my errors and misconceptions. Monica Lilley and Joanna Norledge were also part of that wonderful support team. I thank Marihelen Stringham, Cindy Levine, Darby Orcutt, and the staff of the Interlibrary loan office at DH Hill library at North Carolina State University, who always supported my research with professionalism and good humor.

Some of the friends who have offered ideas, guidance, friendship, and sustenance of all kinds along the way include Gwenda Young, Jim Morrison, Diane Negra, Joe Gomez, Tom Gunning, Toby Miller, Steve Elworth, Ora Gelley, Inga Pollmann, Bob Kolker, Eibhear Walshe, Lance Pettit, Gregg Flaxman, Markos Hadjioannou, Deb Wyrick, Shilyh Warren, Jean Walton, Mary Capello, Bella Honess Roe, Bob Burgoyne, Dana Bartelt, and Amelie Hastie.

I offer special thanks to Tony Harrison, the worlds best department head, for his support and friendship.

While I have drawn more than I will ever know from these friends and colleagues, all errors, oversights, and omissions remain my own.

I presented work related to this book at conferences and invited talks, and I gratefully acknowledge the individuals who gave me opportunities to share my work: Ruth Barton, who organized the Screening Irish America Conference at University College Dublin (2007), Jim Morrison, who organized the panel on the long take at the New Orleans SCMS Conference (2011), and Diane Negra, who gathered the panel on transnational Irishness at SCMS in Boston (2012). Gwenda Young invited me to present my work at the University College Cork Seminar (2009); Bella Honess Roe invited me to present work at the University of Surrey (2011); and Inga Pollmann asked me to speak at the Triangle Film Salon (2012). I thank those whom I met over the course of the project and who kindly included early versions of this material in their books: Tatjana Ljulic and Richard Daniels, and Constantin Parvulescu and Robert Rosenstone.

I gratefully acknowledge the Fulbright fellowship that brought me to Cork in 2007 for a semester that provided the impetus for the project. The College of Humanities and Social Sciences and the English Department at NC State University supported several trips to the Stanley Kubrick Archive in London.

I thank President Philip Nolan and my colleagues in Media Studies at the National University of Ireland MaynoothStephanie Rains, Gavan Titley, Jeneen Naji, Kylie Jarrett, Anne OBrien, Denis Condon, and Anne Byrne who graciously supported my leave in the fall of 2013 so that I could finish the manuscript and welcomed me to Maynooth with the utmost courtesy and collegiality.

Four anonymous readers were instrumental in helping me to shape my argument. Ryan Craver provided indispensable assistance in locating images.

Katie Gallof at Bloomsbury has been unflagging in her support, from start to finish. She gave me the gift of time, friendship, and autonomy: true luxuries for academic writers. Mary Al-Sayed ensured that the production process was painless.

Good friends who constantly reminded me that the world does not revolve around Barry Lyndon include Beth Hardin, Deb Wyrick, Ellen Garrett, Kim Loudermilk, Annie Merrill, Sharon Joffe, Dorianne Laux, Melissa Rossi, Francesca Talenti, Andrea Gomez, Susan Miller-Cochran, Val Coogan, Anne OMalley, Elaine Orr, Shanti Ferguson, Amanda Roop, Jenn Gerteisen Marks, Leslie Blackwell, Celeste Pearson, Lakshmi Om, Padma Om, Ganesh Om, and Satya Om. I thank Chandra Om, who always inspires by example.

A film like Barry Lyndon, which deals with generational loss, cannot fail to bring that subject to consciousness. I regret that I wasnt able to discuss this film with my father, Alfred, who knew more about movies than I ever will. My mother, Jeanne Lacy Pramaggiore, prized her Irish roots and would have offered me a great deal to think about if I had had the opportunity to hear her thoughts. My sister Anne never fails to embrace my work and to support my sometimes unorthodox choices. My nephew Jack, with his preternatural wisdom and enormous heart, offers me hope for the future.

Tom Wallis, who has an astonishing ability to remain grounded no matter what I throw at himfrom endless looping of the Sarabande to bringing home one more rescued dog to transatlantic relocationstands at the center of every frame.

Ireland mustnt be such a bad place so, if the Yanks want to come to Ireland to do their filming.

Johnnypateenmike, The Cripple of Inishmaan

In an interview aired on May 2, 2013 on National Public Radios Morning Edition program, David Chase, the creator of the popular HBO television series The Sopranos (19992007), shared his list of must-see movies with host Steve Inskeep. During their discussion, Inskeep mentions that Chase has included several famous film directors on his list, but has not always recommended their best-known films. A case in point is Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon (1975). Chase agrees with Inskeep, then expresses his admiration for the films Victorian complexity and explains his particular fondness for its protagonist: the guy is a rapscallion, and a rake, and a kind of a scumbag (Chase and Inskeep). Remarking upon the importance of duels in Barry Lyndon, Chase continues: whats great about it is that, with all this violence, theres this overlay of the most civilized conduct, you know, with the handkerchief inside the sleeve (Chase and Inskeep).had to go by. But of course, the code is ridiculous: its a code among sociopaths (Chase and Inskeep).

Having spent several years thinking about Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon, I listened to this exchange with great interest. The discussion brought into relief some of the political and aesthetic questions that initially drew me to the film. One central question that the film raises for me is: what does the world look like when an entire society, indeed a burgeoning global empire rather than a troubling, self-destructive gangster subculture, is governed by a code among sociopaths?

While many films, novels, and television programs made before and after Barry Lyndon envision this scenario as an apocalyptic breakdown of social order, Kubricks unique contribution to the cinematic discourse on humanismnot only in Barry Lyndon, but also in Lolita (1962), Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964), and Eyes Wide Shut (1999)may be his elaboration of a potentially shocking concept: that culture may, in some circumstances, be synonymous with sociopathic violence. In a well-known interview with Michel Ciment, Kubrick made a pointed observation on this subject: Hitler loved good music and many top Nazis were cultured and sophisticated men, but it didnt do them, or anyone else, much good (163). Here Stanley Kubrick echoes the thinking of Walter Benjamin, who wrote in his unfinished

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire»

Look at similar books to Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire»

Discussion, reviews of the book Making Time in Stanley Kubricks Barry Lyndon: Art, History, and Empire and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.