• Complain

David Popenoe - Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society

Here you can read online David Popenoe - Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Transaction Publishers, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Transaction Publishers
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The American family is changing. Divorce, single parents, and stepfamilies are redefi ning the ways we live together and raise our children. Many experts feel these seemingly inevitable changes should be celebrated; they claim that the new families, which often lack a strong father, are actually healthier than traditional two-parent familiesor, at the very least, do children no harm. But as David Popenoe shows in Families Without Fathers this optimistic view is severely misguided. Examining evidence from social and behavioral science, history, and evolutionary biology, Popenoe shows why fathers today are deserting their families in record numbers. The disintegration of the child-centered, two parent familyespecially in the inner cities, where as many as two in three children are growing up without their fathersand the weakening commitment of fathers to their children that more and more follows divorce, are central causes of many of our worst individual and social problems. Juvenile delinquency, drug and alcohol abuse, teenage pregnancy, welfare dependency, and child poverty can be directly traced to fathers lack of involvement in their childrens lives. Our situation will only get worse, Popenoe warns, unless men are willing to renew their commitment to their marriages and to their children. Yet he is not just an alarmist. He suggests concrete policies, and new ways of thinking and acting that will help all fathers improve their marriages and family lives, and tells us what we as individuals and as a society can do to support and strengthen the most important thing a man can do.

David Popenoe: author's other books


Who wrote Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
FAMILIES WITHOUT FATHERS FAMILIES WITHOUT FATHERS FATHERS MARRIAGE AND - photo 1
FAMILIES WITHOUT FATHERS
FAMILIES WITHOUT FATHERS
FATHERS, MARRIAGE AND CHILDREN IN AMERICAN SOCIETY
DAVID POPENOE
With a new introduction by the author
Originally published in 1996 by David Popenoe Published 2009 by Transaction - photo 2
Originally published in 1996 by David Popenoe
Published 2009 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2017 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
New material this edition copyright 2009 by Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2009003613
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Popenoe, David, 1932-
Families without fathers : fathers, marriage and children in American society / David Popenoe.
p. cm.
Originally published: Life without father
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4128-1038-8 (alk. paper)
1. Fatherless families--United States. 2. Fatherhood--United States. 3. Fathers-United States. 4. Paternal deprivation-United States. 5. Children of single parents-United States. 6. United States-Social conditions. I. Title.
HQ756.P65 2009
306.856--dc22
2009003613
ISBN 13: 978-1-4128-1038-8 (pbk)
Contents
T he fifteen years since this book was written have seen many improvements in modern life in such matters as higher personal incomes, greater longevity, lower rates of crime and delinquency, and even some fathers more involved in child care than their own fathers were. Unfortunately, however, family life has continued to deteriorate. The rate of deterioration has slowed significantly since the tumultuous decades of the 1970s and 1980s, and a few trends, such as the divorce rate, have turned around. But the marriage rate has decreased by another twenty percent, the percentage of unwed births has increased by more than twenty percent, andlinked to these two trendsthe percentage of all couples cohabiting outside of marriage has doubled. An important outcome, with far reaching consequences,is thatlife without father has become a reality for a growing number of American children.
During this period America has clearly awakened to the problem of fatherlessness. Voices publicly speaking out for responsible fatherhood from people such as former presidents Bill Clinton and George W Bush, comedian Bill Cosby, and Barack Obama, have helped greatly to put the issue of fatherhood on the American social and political agenda. Even the left, which once chose to ignore or diminish the issue due to concerns about stigmatizing single parents and appearing to support the return of patriarchy, is no longer so contentious.But most of the new discussion of fatherlessness focuses on the American black community. Fatherlessness is seldom viewed as the endemicand ominouspart of the modern family trend that it is. And, importantly, the main emphasis has been on responsible fatherhood, which typically means that absent fathers should be more responsible, see their children more often and dutifully pay child support.What is omitted in these fatherhood discussions is any mention of the age-old institution that was specifically designed to hold fathers to their children, and to the mothers of those children: marriage. About the continued weakening of marriage there has been a thunderous silence.
The main theme of Families without Fathers is that as marriage declines, fatherhood will inevitably weaken and children will be hurtand this is exactly what is happening today.The great majority of young people still say that they want to marry (someday), marriage has become a prime goal for the gay and lesbian community, and everybody seems to love a wedding. But, in fact, as the trends in marriage, cohabitation, and unwed births indicate, the institution of marriage continues to weaken at an alarming pace.And unless these trends are turned around, no amount of responsible fatherhood talk will ever manage to bring fathers securely and meaningfully back into the lives of their children.
It is not easy to explain precisely why marriage continues to weaken, but it is important to understand that it is weakening in virtually all modem societies, indicating that wide-ranging contemporary cultural currents are to blame. Since the Enlightenment perhaps the single most compelling cultural shift has been in the direction of ever-increasing personal autonomygreater freedom from religion, from the state, from the community, and yes, from the family. The zeitgeist of our age is to want to do our own thing, on our own time; to be recognized as an individual, not as a member of some group. In the case of marriage, if one doesnt find it satisfying, rewarding, fulfilling, empowering, the strong tendency is to get out. Or better yet, to avoid being tied down, not enter into marriage to begin with. Especially in an environment of material affluence, the modern individual has become increasingly able to reject on impulse what is not wanted, and accept only what is felt to be wanted.
Unfortunately, this trend toward personal autonomy can beand has beenover extended. Stable societies rely heavily on strong interpersonal attachments that tend to override personal autonomy. People feel happiest and most self-fulfilled not when they have complete autonomy but when they have strong, trusting connections to otherspeople on whom they can rely. When the drive for personal autonomy strikes at the heart of the family, therefore, overriding the needs and rights of dependents and other adults in the household, it leads inevitably to weakened family structure and widespread family break up. Childrearing becomes compromised, adult attachments are severed, and the social stability that we all count on is undermined.
How can the situation be turned around? There are few motivations in the world, other than self preservation, that are stronger than the devotion of parents to their children. People have a strong propensity to care for their biological offspring. If this were not the case, none of us would be here. Yet the propensity is far stronger in women than in men, making the mother-child bond so prominent in human affairs. Historically, the mother and child usually didnt survive unless they had the provision and protection of a man, and the biological father was the mostly likely to be so inclined. It was in order to strengthen this three way biological tie, the so-called natural family that included the father, that societies developed, promoted, and regulated the institution of marriage. In other words society, in its wisdom, has recognized that in order to hold the father to the mother and child a cultural tie had to be developed where a biological tie was weak.
Today, fathers are not needed for the physical survival of mothers and children, and the cultural tie of marriage has withered. But fathers still are needed, based on all of the evidence discussed in
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society»

Look at similar books to Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society»

Discussion, reviews of the book Families Without Fathers: Fathers, Marriage and Children in American Society and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.