Baseline Co. Ltd
All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or adapted without the permission of the copyright holder, throughout the world. Unless otherwise specified, copyright on the works reproduced lies with the respective photographers. Despite intensive research, it has not always been possible to establish copyright ownership. Where this is the case, we would appreciate notification.
1. Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1873.
Oil on canvas, 48 x cm .
Muse Marmottan, Paris.
PREFACE
was the prescient title of one of Claude Monets paintings shown in 1874 in the first exhibition of the Impressionists, or as they called themselves then, the Socit anonyme des artistes, peintres, sculpteurs, graveurs (the Anonymous Society of Artist, Painters, Sculptors, and Engravers). Monet painted scenes of his childhood hometown of Le Havre to prepare for the event, eventually selecting his best Havre landscapes for display. Edmond Renoir, journalist brother of Renoir the painter, compiled the catalogue. He criticised Monet for the uniform titles of his works, for the painter had not come up with anything more interesting than View of Le Havre. Among these Havre landscapes was a canvas painted in the early morning depicting a blue fog that seemed to transform the shapes of yachts into ghostly apparitions. The painting also depicted smaller boats gliding over the water in black silhouette, and above the horizon the flat, orange disk of the sun, its first rays casting an orange path across the sea. It was more like a rapid study than a painting, a spontaneous sketch done in oils what better way to seize the fleeting moment when sea and sky coalesce before the blinding light of day? View of Le Havre was obviously an inappropriate title for this particular painting, as Le Havre was nowhere to be seen. Write Impression, Monet told Edmond Renoir, and in that moment began the story of Impressionism.
On 25 April 1874, the art critic Louis Leroy published a satirical piece in the journal Charivari that described a visit to the exhibition by an official artist. As he moves from one painting to the next, the artist slowly goes insane. He criticises the surface of a painting by Camille Pissarro, describing the ploughed field as shavings from an artists palette carelessly deposited onto a soiled canvas. When looking at the painting he is unable to tell top from bottom, or one side from the other. He is horrified by Monets landscape entitled . Indeed, in Leroys satire, it is Monets work that pushes the academician over the edge. Stopping in front of one of the Havre landscapes, he asks what Impression, Sunrise depicts. Impression, of course, mutters the academician. I said so myself, too, because I am so impressed, there must be some impression in here and what freedom, what technical ease! At which point he begins to dance a jig in front of the paintings, exclaiming: Hey! Ho! Im a walking impression, Im an avenging palette knife (Charivari, 25 April 1874). Leroy called his article, The Exhibition of the Impressionists. With typical French finesse, he had adroitly coined a new word from the paintings title, a word so fitting that it was destined to remain forever in the vocabulary of the history of art.
Responding to questions from a journalist in 1880, Monet said: Im the one who came up with the word, or who at least, through a painting that I had exhibited, provided some reporter from Le Figaro the opportunity to write that scathing article. It was a big hit, as you know. (Lionello Venturi, Les Archives de limpressionnisme, Paris, Durand-Ruel, 1939, vol. 2, p. 340).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa38d/fa38dd45cd04e6609335028d76b0f29c404a682d" alt="2 Pierre Auguste Renoir Nude 1876 Oil on canvas 92 x cm The Pushkin - photo 4"
2. Pierre Auguste Renoir, Nude, 1876.
Oil on canvas, 92 x cm .
The Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ccc7/3ccc7afb718a7e1fba0015243e5988ec51cf068c" alt="3 Edgar Degas Woman Combing her Hair c1888-1890 Pastel on paper 787 x - photo 5"
3. Edgar Degas, Woman Combing her Hair, c.1888-1890.
Pastel on paper, 78.7 x cm .
Mr. and Mrs. A. Alfred Taubman Collection.
THE IMPRESSIONISTS AND ACADEMIC PAINTING
The young men who would become the Impressionists formed a group in the early 1860s. Claude Monet, son of a Le Havre shopkeeper, Frdric Bazille, son of a wealthy Montpellier family, Alfred Sisley, son of an English family living in France, and Pierre Auguste Renoir, son of a Parisian tailor had all come to study painting in the independent studio of Charles Gleyre, whom in their view was the only teacher who truly personified neo-classical painting.
The formal qualities of his female nudes can only be compared to the work of the great Dominique Ingres. In Gleyres independent studio, pupils received traditional training in neo-classical painting, but were free from the official requirements of the cole des beaux-arts.
All four artists burned with desire to grasp the principles of painting and neo-classical technique: after all, this was the reason that they had come to Gleyres studio. They applied themselves to the study of the nude figure and successfully passed all their required exam competitions, receiving prizes for drawing, perspective, anatomy, and likeness. Each of the future Impressionists received Gleyres praise on some occasion.
One day Renoir decided to impress his teacher by painting a nude according to all the rules, as he put it: tan flesh emerging from bitumen black as night, backlighting caressing the shoulder, and the tortured look that accompanies stomach cramps. (Jean Renoir, Pierre Auguste Renoir, mon pre, Paris, Gallimard, 1981, p. 119). Gleyre was struck by Renoirs impertinence and his shock and indignation were not unwarranted: his student had proved that he was perfectly capable of painting as the teacher required, whereas all the other youths were bent on depicting their models as they are in everyday life (J. Renoir, op. cit., p. 120). Monet remembers the way Gleyre reacted to one of his own nudes: Not bad, he exclaimed, not bad at all, this business here. But it is too much about this particular model. You have a heavyset man. He has huge feet, which you depict as such. Its all very ugly. So remember young man, when we draw a figure, we must always keep in mind the antique. Nature, my friend, is a very admirable aspect of research, but it provides no interest. (Franois Daulte, Frdric Bazille et son temps, Geneva, Pierre Cailler, 1952, p. 30).
To the future Impressionists, nature was exactly what interested them most. Renoir remembered what Frdric Bazille had told him when they first met: Large-scale classical compositions are over. The spectacle of everyday life is more fascinating. (J. Renoir,