• Complain

David Miller De Witt - The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt

Here you can read online David Miller De Witt - The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Read Books Ltd, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

David Miller De Witt The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt

The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

David Miller De Witt: author's other books


Who wrote The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
THE JUDICIAL MURDER of MARY E SURRATT By DAVID MILLER DE WITT First - photo 1
THE
JUDICIAL MURDER
of
MARY E. SURRATT
By
DAVID MILLER DE WITT
First published in 1894
Copyright 2020 Read Co History This edition is published by Read Co - photo 2
Copyright 2020 Read & Co. History
This edition is published by Read & Co. History,
an imprint of Read & Co.
This book is copyright and may not be reproduced or copied in any
way without the express permission of the publisher in writing.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available
from the British Library.
Read & Co. is part of Read Books Ltd.
For more information visit
www.readandcobooks.co.uk
Oceans of horse-hair, continents of parchment, and learned-sergeant eloquence, were it continued till the learned tongue wore itself small in the indefatigable learned mouth, cannot make the unjust just. The grand question still remains, Was the judgment just? If unjust, it will not and cannot get harbour for itself, or continue to have footing in this Universe, which was made by other than One Unjust. Enforce it by never such statuting, three readings, royal assents; blow it to the four winds with all manner of quilted trumpeters and pursuivants, in the rear of them never so many gibbets and hangmen, it will not stand, it cannot stand. From all souls of men, from all ends of Nature, from the Throne of God above, there are voices bidding it: Away! Away!
Past and Present
Contents
Abr aham Lincoln
PRELIMINARY
CHAPTER I
THE REI GN OF TERROR
CHAPTER II
THE BUREAU OF MILITARY (IN)JUSTICE
PART I
THE MURDER
CHAPTER I
THE OPENING OF THE COURT
CHAPTER II
ANIMUS O F THE JUDGES
CHAPTER III
THE CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL
CHAPTER IV
ARGUMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE
CHAPTER V
CHARGE OF J UDGE BINGHAM
CHAPTER VI
THE VERDICT, SENTENCE AND PETITION
CHAPTER VII
THE DEATH WARRANT AND T HE EXECUTION
CHAPTER VIII
WAS IT NOT MURDER?
PART II
THE VINDICATION
CHAPTER I
SETTING ASIDE THE VERDICT
CHAPTER II
REVERSAL UPO N THE MERITS
CHAPTER III
THE RECOMMENDAT ION TO MERCY
CHAPTER IV
THE TRIAL OF JOSEPH HOLT
CHAPTER V
ANDREW JOHNSON SIGNS ANOTHER D EATH-WARRANT
CHAPTER VI
CONCLUSION
Abraham Lincoln
16th President of the United States: born in a rude farm cabin near Hodgensville, Ky., 12 Feb. 1809; died in Washington, D. C, 15 April 1865. The birthplace is marked by a memorial structure dedicated on his hundredth a nniversary.
He was the first son and second child of Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks, both born in Rockingham County, Va., of parents who were among the earliest emigrants to the new country beyond the mountains. They were married in Washington County, 12 June 1806, at the home of Richard Berry, guardian of the bride and husband of Lucy Shipley, her aunt. Thomas was not yet six when his father, Abraham, was killed by lurking Indians while he was at work on his farm. The estate, mostly of wild land, descended by the existing law to his eldest son. No account remains of the widow's subsequent life. Probably she did not long survive t he tragedy.
Thomas grew up utterly without education and apparently without a definite home. Principally occupied as a farm and forest laborer he acquired some knowledge of the tools and trade of a carpenter. For reasons not uncommon in the lives of families separated by distant migrations the President had little knowledge of his forbears beyond the paternal grandfather. Long after his death it transpired that the first American progenitor was Samuel Lincoln who came from England as a weaver's apprentice in 1637. Two elder brothers had previously settled at Hingham, Mass.; named after the English shire town of County Norwich, their ancestral home. Samuel joined them there after completing his apprenticeship at Salem. Neither of the brothers left issue, the name being perpetuated through Mordecai, son of the young weaver; Mordecai 2d, his grandson; John, a great-grandson who lived for a time in Berks County, Pa., removing to Virginia; Abraham, the Kentucky pioneer; and Thomas, fifth in the order of American birth. The pedigree has been further traced through four generations in England. In both the old home and the new the main and converging lines of heredity gave promise of family distinction should time and occasion propitiously meet. It was mistakenly believed for a time that Thomas and his wife were first cousins. She was the daughter of Joseph Hanks and Nancy Shipley (Nanny as named in the husband's will), who was a sister of Lucy Shipley, wife of Richard Berry before mentioned. Another sister, Mary by name, had married Abraham Lincoln the elder, and it was assumed that she was the mother of all his children. In fact, however, Mary Shipley died prior to the Kentucky migration and was succeeded by Bathsheba Herring, daughter of Leonard Herring, a Virginian of English parentage. Thomas was the son and only child of this second marriage and therefore unrelated by blood to Nancy his wife. It is worthy of passing mention that still another of the Shipley sisters was married to Thomas Sparrow and went with him to the Kentucky wilderness. Through the marriage of their daughter with one Charles Friend she became the grandmother of Dennis Friend who somehow came to be known as Dennis Hanks; and was no credit to either name. The irresponsible chatter of this waif did much to mislead the biographers both as to the story of Lincoln's youth and the Hanks genealogy. (Consult Lea and Hutchinson, The Ancestry of Abraham Lincoln, Bo ston 1909).
The first home of Thomas and his wife was at Elizabethtown, Ky., where he pursued his trade as carpenter. Two adventures in farming ensued, the first on the Nolin Creek place where their famous son was born. A second son, also born there, lived but a few weeks. Upon neither farm apparently were payments made sufficient to create a salable interest. In 1817, several related families accompanying them, they moved to Indiana, settling on a wooded tract near Gentryville in Spencer County; so named after the keeper of a cross-roads store. A railroad junction point called Lincoln City occupies a part of the chosen homestead. In October of the following year a mysterious epidemic swept the district, Mrs. Lincoln being one of many victims. During the next 14 months, the daughter, but two years older than Abraham, kept house for the sorrowing family. On 2 Dec. 1819, Thomas took another wife from Kentucky, Sarah Johnston (ne Bush), a widow with three children residing at Elizabethtown. Her advent greatly improved the family circumstances, for besides household conveniences such as the children had never known she brought a kind and cheerful nature. Among other benefits conferred she encouraged the boy in studies, which his father regarded as a form of idleness. Less than a year of school attendance is all that fell to his lot, but with this meagre help he learned to read and write and to cipher to the rule of three. Luckily there were a few good books within reach, all of which he eagerly read. He remembered well, thought much and diligently exercised the knowledge gained. In other respects he was a boy among boys, loving fun and not enamored of manual toil. He was made to work at home or on the neighboring farms, clerked at odd times in Gentry's store and at the age of 19 accompanied the son of that worthy on a flat-boat trip to New Orleans, trading along the way and returning by river packet. On that memorable venture he first came into conscious contact with slavery, witnessing, it is said, an auction sale of negroes and vowing that if ever the opportunity came to hit that system he would hi t it hard.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt»

Look at similar books to The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.