• Complain

Liangyan Ge - The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China

Here you can read online Liangyan Ge - The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: University of Washington Press, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Liangyan Ge The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China
  • Book:
    The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Washington Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In imperial China, intellectuals devoted years of their lives to passing rigorous examinations in order to obtain a civil service position in the state bureaucracy. This traditional employment of the literati class conferred social power and moral legitimacy, but changing social and political circumstances in the Ming (13681644) and Qing (16441911) periods forced many to seek alternative careers. Politically engaged but excluded from their traditional bureaucratic roles, creative writers authored critiques of state power in the form of fiction written in the vernacular language.
In this study, Liangyan Ge examines the novels Romance of the Three Kingdoms, The Scholars, Dream of the Red Chamber (also known as Story of the Stone), and a number of erotic pieces, showing that as the literati class grappled with its own increasing marginalization, its fiction reassessed the assumption that intellectuals proper role was to serve state interests and began to imagine possibilities for a new political order.

Liangyan Ge: author's other books


Who wrote The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Acknowledgments For the research and writing that have resulted in this book I - photo 1
Acknowledgments

For the research and writing that have resulted in this book, I received generous financial support from the Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation in the form of a research grant. I also benefited from a research travel grant from the University of Notre Dames Institute for Scholarship in Liberal Arts, which enabled me to visit some of the major libraries in China, including the National Library in Beijing and the Municipal Library of Shanghai. I am grateful to the College of Arts and Letters and the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at University of Notre Dame for granting me a one-year research leave and a one-semester research leave, which greatly facilitated this book project.

I am deeply indebted to many individuals for their help throughout the entire course or at different stages of the project. Eugene Eoyang, as always, has been a major source of inspiration for me. At an early stage of the project I received advice from Benjamin Elman, which proved immensely valuable. Several other scholarsincluding Robert Hegel, Anthony Yu (even in his retirement!), Victor Mair, David Rolston, Vibeke Brdahl, Martin Huang, Patricia Sieber, Paul Jakov Smith, Anne E. McLaren, Margaret Wan, Ming Dong Gu, Sheldon Hsiao-peng Lu, Guo Yingde, Xin Ying, Shi Yaohua, and Han Jiegen, among otherseither shared with me their views on the project or offered comments and suggestions on my manuscript or portions of it. To them, I am deeply grateful.I am also thankful to my colleagues and students at University of Notre Dame, who have made teaching and research such a joy for me. Special thanks are due to the staff of Notre Dames Hesburgh Library, especially Hye-jin Juhn, for indulging my numerous requests for interlibrary loans of books and articles.

Let me thank my wife, Yongqing, who has spared me most of the household chores throughout the years, which made this book project considerably less daunting to me. Thanks are also due to my daughter Sherry and her husband Vijay, who, as medical students, have become my best-trusted health advisers and a major source of encouragement. I am also grateful to my numerous friends in China, the United States, and elsewhere, whose telephone calls and email messages have added so much joy and comfort to my life.

Two anonymous reviewers with the University of Washington Press read my manuscript meticulously and offered many insightful comments and suggestions for revision. To them, I am profoundly indebted. Needless to say, any remaining errors and shortcomings in this book are mine. I am also deeply thankful to the editors at the University of Washington Press, especially Executive Editor Lorri Hagman, who have been instrumental in bringing this work to print.

If this book can be considered any kind of achievement, I owe it to the teachers who guided my intellectual development, from elementary school to graduate school. Even after I became a college professor, I continued to benefit from my teachers, even though I did not formally take a course with some of them. To all my teachers, this book is dedicated, with enduring respect and gratitude.

A Note on Chinese Romanization

In this book the pinyin system is used for Chinese romanization. For citations from sources where the Wade-Giles system is used, all Chinese names and terms in the text have been converted to pinyin for the sake of consistency. The Wade-Giles romanization for titles of books and articles, however, remains unchanged. I thank the original authors for their understanding.

Selected Bibliography

Aixinjueluo Xuanye The Scholar and the State Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China - image 2. The Scholar and the State Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China - image 3. Qing Shengzu Ren Huangdi yuzhi wenjiThe Scholar and the State Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China - image 4. Siku quanshuPicture 5 ed.

Ames, Roger T. The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.

Anderson, Marston. The Scorpion in the Scholars Cap: Ritual, Memory, and Desire in Rulin Waishi. In Culture and State in Chinese History: Conventions, Accommodations, and Critiques, edited by Theodore Huters, R. Bin Wong, and Pauline Yu, 25976. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.

Anonymous. GuoyuPicture 6. Siku quanshu ed.

Anonymous. Nkaike zhuanPicture 7. Guben xiaoshuo jichengPicture 8 ed.

Aristotle. The Poetics. Translated by Leon Golden. Tallahassee: University Presses of Florida, 1981.

Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Edited by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.

Ban Gu Picture 9. Qian Han shuPicture 10. Siku quanshu ed.

Bol, Peter K. On the Problem of Contextualizing Ideas: Reflections on Yu Yingshis Approach to the Study of Song Daoxue. Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 34 (2004): 5979.

Brokaw, Cynthia J. The Ledgers of Merit and Demerit. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.

Brook, Timothy. The Confusions of Pleasures: Commerce and Culture in Ming China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

Cao Renhu Picture 11 and Ji Huang Picture 12. Qinding Xu wenxian tongkaoPicture 13. Siku quanshu ed.

Cao Xueqin Picture 14. Honglou meng: Qi xu benPicture 15: Picture 16. 5 vols. Guben xiaoshuo jicheng ed.

. Zhiyanzhai chongping Shitou ji: Gengchen benPicture 17: Picture 18. 4 vols. Guben xiaoshuo jicheng ed.

. Zhiyanzhai chongping Shitou ji: Jiaxu benPicture 19: Picture 20. Guben xiaoshuo jicheng ed.

Cao Xueqin Picture 21 and Gao E Picture 22. Honglou mengPicture 23. 4 vols. Beijing: Renmin wenxue chubanshe, 1973.

. The Story of the Stone

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China»

Look at similar books to The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Scholar and the State: Fiction as Political Discourse in Late Imperial China and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.