• Complain

Jon Calame - Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia

Here you can read online Jon Calame - Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Philadelphia, Pa., year: 2011, publisher: University of Pennsylvania Press, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Pennsylvania Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • City:
    Philadelphia, Pa.
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In Jerusalem, Israeli and Jordanian militias patrolled a fortified, impassable Green Line from 1948 until 1967. In Nicosia, two walls and a buffer zone have segregated Turkish and Greek Cypriots since 1963. In Belfast, peaceline barricades have separated working-class Catholics and Protestants since 1969. In Beirut, civil war from 1974 until 1990 turned a cosmopolitan city into a lethal patchwork of ethnic enclaves. In Mostar, the Croatian and Bosniak communities have occupied two autonomous sectors since 1993. These cities were not destined for partition by their social or political histories. They were partitioned by politicians, citizens, and engineers according to limited information, short-range plans, and often dubious motives. How did it happen? How can it be avoided?
Divided Cities explores the logic of violent urban partition along ethnic lineswhen it occurs, who supports it, what it costs, and why seemingly healthy cities succumb to it. Planning and conservation experts Jon Calame and Esther Charlesworth offer a warning beacon to a growing class of cities torn apart by ethnic rivals. Field-based investigations in Beirut, Belfast, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia are coupled with scholarly research to illuminate the history of urban dividing lines, the social impacts of physical partition, and the assorted professional responses to self-imposed apartheid. Through interviews with people on both sides of a divideresidents, politicians, taxi drivers, built-environment professionals, cultural critics, and journaliststhey compare the evolution of each urban partition along with its social impacts. The patterns that emerge support an assertion that division is a gradual, predictable, and avoidable occurrence that ultimately impedes intercommunal cooperation. With the voices of divided-city residents, updated partition maps, and previously unpublished photographs, Divided Cities illuminates the enormous costs of physical segregation.

Jon Calame: author's other books


Who wrote Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The City in the 21st Century Eugenie L Birch and Susan M Wachter Series - photo 1
The City in the 21st Century
Eugenie L. Birch and Susan M. Wachter, Series Editors
A complete list of books in the series is available
from the publisher.
Divided Cities
Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem,
Mostar, and Nicosia
Jon Calame and Esther Charlesworth
PENN
University of Pennsylvania Press
Philadelphia
Copyright 2009 University of Pennsylvania Press
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher.
Published by
University of Pennsylvania Press
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Calame, Jon.
Divided cities : Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia / Jon Calame and Esther Charlesworth.
p. cm.(The City in the 21st Century)
ISBN: 978-0-8122-4134-1 (alk. paper)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. City and town life. 2. Urban violence. 3. Urban warfare. 4. Persecution. 5. Population transfers. 6. Beirut (Lebanon)History. 7. Belfast (Northern Ireland)History. 8. JerusalemHistory. 9. Mostar (Bosnia and Hercegovina)History. 10. Nicosia (Cyprus)History. I. Title. II. Charlesworth, Esther Ruth
HT153.C24 2009
307.76dc22
2008035354
Foreword
Lebbeus Woods
The five cities under study in this book are vitally important to an understanding of the contemporary world. Each is different, in that each emerges from a unique historical background, belonging to a quite particular and localized set of cultural conditions. Yet, each shares with the others a common set of existential factors, belonging to what we might call an emerging global condition. Prominent among these is sectarianisma confrontation of differing, though not necessarily opposed, religious beliefs, leading to widespread violenceand a stopgap solution focused on the physical separation of conflicting parties and communities. The other feature shared by the cities under study is that the stopgap solution of separation, intended as an emergency measure to prevent bloodshed and disorder, turns into more or less persistent, if not permanent, division. No one intends to create divided cities as a long-term solution to sectarian violence; rather, such cities emerge from the seeming intractability of the conflicts and their causes.
The story of the present is increasingly being written in terms of religious conflicts. The secularism of the West is exposed through globalization to the sectarian quarrels that bedevil many regions of the world. Western institutions of government and commerce, which operate according to democratic processes or market-savvy principles, are no match in single-minded determination for those elsewhere driven by religious fervor. On the defensive, they have hardened their own positions accordingly. At the same time, Western politicians are not above exploiting religious differences to disguise neocolonial ambitions.
Going against two centuries of growing liberalism in the West, there are many new wallsphysical, legal, psychologicalbeing hastily thrown up in the interests of security to separate us from them. This goes beyond realities of gated communities for the rich, and restrictive, ethnically biased immigration laws, extending to attempts to seal entire national borders. If the perceived threat of religious warfare increases dramatically, it is conceivable that, not only in the West, ghettoes and internment camps may be deemed necessary. Looking to the future, this is the worst-case scenario. Can things possibly get that bad, in this information-enlightened age?
To insure they will not, it is necessary to understand not only the tragic mistakes of the past, but also the dynamics of the present in terms of the polarization of peoples and their communities. Critical aspects of these dynamics are revealed in this book, for in the physical divisions of Beirut, Nicosia, Belfast, Mostar, and Jerusalem the means by which fear and misunderstanding are given physical form are revealed in all their dimensions. Once in place, the barriers separating disputing groups become the mechanisms for sustaining the urban pathology of communities at war with themselves. The right thing, as this book inspires us to imagine, is to remove the barriers and replace them with new openings for dialogue and exchange. The best thing, however, is never to build the barriers at all. It is to that distant, but attainable, goal that I believe this book is dedicated.
Preface
This book is the result of research conducted between 1998 and 2003 in five ethnically partitioned cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Nicosia, and Mostar. As it went to press in 2008, Beirut still smoldered in the wake of new clashes between Hezbollah and Israel, Baghdad neighborhoods were partitioned according to religious sect, and racial divisions in New Orleans following the Katrina hurricane were still starkly unmended. Though old divisions persist and new ones emerge, fresh insights about how and why urban partitions happen remain in short supply.
The effort to isolate patterns that could provide such insights began in 1996 with our involvement in a reconstruction planning workshop in the Bosnian city of Mostar. The capacity of the divided administration there to coordinate an effective response to social and physical crises in the postwar context was severely limited. Many capable foreign experts stayed away, too, emphasizing the need for a political settlement before revitalization could progress. Investment prior to unification would effectively sanction ethnic segregation, they argued. Still, foreign professionals of all types poured into this vacuum to provide humanitarian assistance, funding, and advice of all kinds.
We were among the dozens of foreign architects, planners, and conservators who visited Mostar with the intention to work despite the political stalemate. We saw that important decisions regarding reconstruction were being left to self-anointed foreign donor agencies working, for the most part, in an isolated and unregulated fashion. It was clear that preliminary consideration of long-term impacts, tradeoffs, and models for successful post-conflict development was rare. Even if those involved had wanted to plot their moves more systematically, the kind of documentation and analysis needed to support such considerations simply did not exist.
A credible response to the questions we encountered in Mostar required close examination of other cities polarized by ethnic conflict. This book summarizes the patterns and insights that emerged in relation to pre- and post-partition phases of urban development. We conclude that divided cities are not aberrations. Instead, they are the unlucky vanguard of a large and growing class of cities. In these troubled places, intercommunal rivalry seems inevitably to recommend physical segregation.
Our discussions with urban professionals, politicians, policymakers, cultural critics, and residents in these five cities suggest that mistakes could have been avoided if decision makers had possessed a broader understanding of urban partition's causes and consequences. We learned that symptoms of discord in the urban environmentin particular, physical partitionsoften affirm local assumptions about persecution and encourage one ethnic community to antagonize another. In this sense, they are a self-fulfilling prophecy of involuntary separation and militancy between urban neighbors with a history of mutual distrust.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia»

Look at similar books to Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia»

Discussion, reviews of the book Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.