• Complain

John H. Kautsky - The Politics of Aristocratic Empires

Here you can read online John H. Kautsky - The Politics of Aristocratic Empires full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: London, year: 1982, publisher: Routledge, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

John H. Kautsky The Politics of Aristocratic Empires
  • Book:
    The Politics of Aristocratic Empires
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1982
  • City:
    London
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Politics of Aristocratic Empires: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Politics of Aristocratic Empires" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Politics of Aristocratic Empires is a study of a political order that prevailed throughout much of the world for many centuries without any major social conflict or change and with hardly any government in the modern sense. Although previously ignored by political science, powerful remnants of this old order still persist in modern politics.The historical literature on aristocratic empires typically is descriptive and treats each empire as unique. By contrast, this work adopts an analytical, explanatory, and comparative approach and clearly distinguishes aristocratic empires from both primitive and more modern, commercialized societies. It develops generalizations that are supported and richly illustrated by data from many empires and demonstrates that a pattern of politics prevailed across time, space, and cultures from ancient Egypt five millennia ago to Saudi Arabia five decades ago, from China and Japan to Europe, from the Incas and the Aztecs to the Tutsi. Kautsky argues that aristocrats, because they live off the labor of peasants, must perform the primary governmental functions of taxation and warfare. Their performance is linked to particular values and beliefs, and both functions and ideologies in turn condition the stakes, the forms, and the arenas of intra-aristocratic conflictthe politics of the aristocracy.The author also analyzes the roles of the peasantry and the townspeople in aristocratic politics and shows that peasant revolts on any large scale occur only after commercial modernization. He concludes with chapters on the modernization of aristocratic empires and on the importance in modern politics of institutional and ideological remnants of the old aristocratic order.

John H. Kautsky: author's other books


Who wrote The Politics of Aristocratic Empires? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Politics of Aristocratic Empires — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Politics of Aristocratic Empires" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Politics of Aristocratic Empires
The Politics of Aristocratic Empires
John H. Kautsky
With a new introduction by the author
The Politics of Aristocratic Empires - image 1
Originally published in 1982 by The University of North Carolina Press.
Published 1997 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2017 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
New material this edition copyright 1997 by Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 96-17936
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Kautsky, John H., 1922
The politics of aristocratic empires / John H. Kautsky; with a new introduction by the author.
p. cm.
Originally published: Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, c1982.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-56000-913-6 (paper : alk. paper)
1. Aristocracy (Political science) I. Title.
JC414.K38 1996
96-17936
306.2dc20
CIP
ISBN 13: 978-1-56000-913-9 (pbk)
To the Memory of Karl Kautsky
Contents
The Politics of Aristocratic Empires was first published in 1982 and went out of print in 1990. Now, as it is being reissued, it is, with respect to its subject matter, no morebut also no lessout of date than when it was written. The book remains relevant as an example of and plea for a possible rapprochement of the disciplines of political science and history. I continue to believe that political science can be enriched by the greater use of the immense treasury of data on the past made available by historians and that the study of history could be advanced if historians more often asked and sought to answer political science questions and dared to develop generalizations across time and space. Although I never expected to have any great impact on the way most political scientists and historians go about their business, I thought it was worthwhile to attempt one small bridge across the gap between the two disciplines.
I was also well aware all along that, while bridging the gap was one way of describing my attempt, falling between two stools could be another. Of course, I cannot tell whether or to what extent political scientists and historians were simply not interested in what I tried to do. I can, however, seek to recall how some of those who did read the book responded to it. To do so, I have just reread a dozen or so reviews of it.
One review deserves special mention, not only because of its prominence, but because it is the only one that totally rejected my enterprise without ever really commenting on the substance of my book, let alone offering any serious criticism of it. Elie Kedourie used his lengthy essay Living off the peasants in the (London) Times Literary Supplement of December 9, 1983, to vent his spleen against comparison and generalizations. My attempt at a social scientific approach to history evidently made him so angry that he could only ridicule it. Taking a few passages, almost all from my first introductory chapter, out of context, he mocked the clean, soaring, audacious lines of Kautskys comparatist [sic] castles and my Marxist master-key [which] will open many, many doors. After referring to a few other comparatists as so many mighty logomachs in all the glory of their flying banners, their clashing armour and their rich caparisons, he finally reached this preposterous conclusion: With the help of [my] observations, a definitions buff, tinkering with a bit of transformative logic, should have little trouble in establishing that the Soviet Union is a living example of aristocratic empire. This would be the breakthrough to a unified and really universal comparative science.
This quaint little essay by a distinguished scholar, can hardly beand was perhaps not even meant to betaken seriously, because it is so obviously preoccupied with attempts at cleverness both in its style and its substance. Apart from it, the reviews of The Politics of Aristocratic Empires were generally quite positive. Adjectives like admirable, ambitious, important, and impressive kept occurring in them, and my book was even variously described as an enormous and capable work of synthesis, a major achievement, a seminal work, and a major landmark in macro-social historical literature.To my amazement, I was even credited with awesome skill in exposition.
One reviewer thought that I gave probably the best account of [the] overall structure of aristocratic empires. Like others, he emphasized and approved of what he called my polemical arguments carried on against other theories current in comparative and historical sociology that there is no sharp difference between feudal and supposedly centralized bureaucratic empires and that the notion of society is misleading when applied to aristocratic empires.
Other controversial points that were appreciated by reviewers are: my argument that there is no clear distinction between Western and non-Western empires before the beginnings of modernization; my observation that peasant revolutions are almost totally absent from aristocratic empires; my analysis of the political impotence of the peasantry and the marginality of the townspeople as a distinctive feature of politics in aristocratic empires; and my discussion of the limited impact of the aristocratic language and religion on their conquered people.
Gratifying as such positive comments were, I was even more pleased that most of the reviewers also offered thoughtful criticism. Some of it, however, seems to me to be the result of misunderstandings. As these may well be due to my own failure to be sufficiently clear, future readers may similarly misunderstand what I wrote. In the hope of reducing the risk of misunderstanding among readers of this edition, I will respond to some reviews here in more or less general terms. I do not mean to argue with the reviewers. That would probably be useless and certainly in bad taste. To avoid giving any such impression, I shall not identify them.
It may be that the title of my book aroused expectations I do not and never intended to fulfill. Thus, one reviewer was clearly disappointed, because I do not deal with the politics of the peasantry, except as it affects the aristocracy. Obviously, the overwhelming majority of the population of aristocratic empires consists of peasants, so a book entitled The Politics of Aristocratic Empires could be expected to deal with intra-village peasant politics. I argue, however, that an aristocratic empire is composed of an aristocratic society distinct from peasant societies, and so my concern was solely with the politics of the aristocracy.
On the other hand, my book is not concerned with all empires in which aristocrats were prominent, but only with what I sometimes call pure or traditional aristocratic empires, those not subject to commercialization, an early form of modernization. I provide a long list of examples of such empires on . Originally, I had entitled my manuscript The Politics of Traditional Empires, but was persuaded to substitute aristocratic for traditional. Neither adjective, by itself, is really satisfactory, but I still cannot think of a better one.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Politics of Aristocratic Empires»

Look at similar books to The Politics of Aristocratic Empires. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Politics of Aristocratic Empires»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Politics of Aristocratic Empires and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.