• Complain

Brian A. Baldo - Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships

Here you can read online Brian A. Baldo - Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Springer-Verlag New York Inc., genre: Home and family. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Brian A. Baldo Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships
  • Book:
    Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The variety of chemically diverse pharmacological agents administered to patients is large and continues to expand and with every new drug released, there is always potential for adverse reactions, some of them allergic. With its roots in immunology and pharmacology, the science of drug allergy is becoming better understood and applied as its importance is increasingly recognized throughout the many branches of medicine. Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships sheds new light on this field. Comprehensive in design, this authoritative title identifies the most important culprit drugs implicated in immediate and delayed drug hypersensitivities and offers up-to-date information on classifications, diagnoses, underlying mechanisms and structure-activity relationships. Chapters dealing with the molecular and cellular mechanisms of drug hypersensitivities, non-immune-mediated sensitivities and diagnostic methods are presented as introductory material for in-depth treatises on the -lactam antibiotics, other antibiotics and antimicrobials, drugs used in anesthesia and surgery, opioid analgesics, corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies and other biologics, drugs used in chemotherapy, proton pump inhibitors, iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In addition to being of immense value to clinicians, other health care professionals and researchers, this title will prove invaluable for those taking undergraduate and graduate courses in science and will also serve as a useful text for students of medicine, pharmacy, nursing and dentistry.

Brian A. Baldo: author's other books


Who wrote Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Brian A. Baldo and Nghia H Pham Drug Allergy 2013 Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships 10.1007/978-1-4614-7261-2_1 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013
1. Adverse Reactions to Drugs and Drug Allergy: Scope of This Book
Brian A. Baldo 1 and Nghia H. Pham 1
(1)
Formerly-Molecular Immunology Unit Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Abstract
In what is essentially a pharmacologically based classification of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), unpredictable and dose-independent drug reactions, designated type B reactions, include hypersensitivity responses while those reactions designated as type A are predictable, dose-dependent, and make up about 80 % of all ADRs. Previous exposure is not always a prerequisite for allergic sensitization, and there are many instances where reactions occur after initial contact with poorly reactive drugs that do not bind to proteins. Risk factors for drug allergy can be divided into those that are patient-related (age, sex, current diseases, previous exposure, genetic factors) and those that are drug-related (nature and cross-reactivity of drug, degree of exposure, route of administration). Genomic studies are already helping to explain some ADRs, for example, the association in Han Chinese of carbamazepine-induced StevensJohnson syndrome with HLA-B*15:02 and the association of abacavir hypersensitivity in abacavir hypersensitivity syndrome with HLA-B*57:01. It seems likely that multiple rather than single genes are involved in ADRs. Drug allergy studies promise to provide significant insights into important areas of biomedical investigation including cell recognition and interaction processes, relationships between receptors and effector pathways and mechanisms of mediator actions.
1.1 Adverse Drug Reactions
1.1.1 Definition
A major and seemingly ever-present risk of pharmacotherapy is adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Drug reactions occur frequently and may need expert management. Reactions can be severe and even life-threatening, necessitating the substitution or discontinuation of preferred medications. An additional unwanted clinical response in a sick patient already under treatment constitutes extra burdens for the patient and the managing physician. With approximately 5 % of patients developing adverse reactions during drug therapy and up to 10 % said to react in hospitals, this adds up to a significant public health problem. The often quoted WHO definition of an ADR, published 40 years ago, is a response to a drug that is noxious and unintended and occurs at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy of disease, or for modification of physiological function. Questioning this definition and in particular the inclusiveness of the wording for minor reactions, Laurence and Carpenter in A dictionary of pharmacology and allied topics: Elsevier, 1998 , suggested: A harmful or significantly unpleasant effect caused by a drug at doses intended for therapeutic effect (or prophylaxis or diagnosis) which warrants reduction of dose or withdrawal of the drug and/or foretells hazard from future administration. I.R. Edwards of the Uppsala Monitoring Centre, a WHO collaborating centre for international drug monitoring, and J.K. Aronson of the Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, regard the WHO definition as vague, especially with regard to the term noxious, ask just how minor can an adverse reaction be, query the narrowness of the term drug and disagree with what they regarded as ambiguities in other published definitions. To cover these perceived deficiencies, Edwards and Aronson proposed their own succinct definition: An appreciably harmful or unpleasant reaction, resulting from an intervention related to the use of a medicinal product, which predicts hazard from future administration and warrants prevention or specific treatment, or alteration of the dosage regimen, or withdrawal of the product.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that any serious adverse event should be reported to the FDA and defines such an event as any undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product in a patient. The event is said to be serious when the patient outcome is death, life-threatening, hospitalization (initial or prolonged), disability or permanent damage, congenital anomaly/birth defect, required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage (devices), and other serious important medical events (e.g., allergic bronchospasm, serious blood dyscrasias, or seizures or convulsions that do not result in hospitalization).
1.1.2 Terminology: Classification of Adverse Drug Reactions and the terms Hypersensitivity, and Allergy
The study of ADRs falls within the discipline of pharmacovigilance. In an early pharmacological classification, ADRs were distinguished primarily on the basis of dose-related and non-dose-related reactions. These two types of reactions were sometimes called types A and B, respectively. Approximately 80 % or more of ADRs are predictable, can be anticipated from the drugs pharmacological actions, are dose-dependent, and resolve when the dose is reduced or withdrawn. Unpredictable reactions, sometimes called idiosyncratic drug reactions, are generally unrelated to the drugs pharmacological actions, are independent of dose, and, even though they usually resolve when treatment is stopped, reactions sometimes progress. From about the early 1980s, three further reaction categories were recognized, one related to dose and time and one classified as delayed but divided into time-related and withdrawal reactions. More recently, a sixth category, unexpected failure of therapy has been added. In some classifications of ADRs, a seventh category G, genetic reactions, is included. This essentially pharmacologically based overall classification of ADRs, together with some distinguishing features and examples of drug reactions, are shown in Table .
Table 1.1
Classification of adverse drug reactions
Reaction type
Examples of reaction
Main features of reaction
A. Augmented pharmacologic effectsa
Toxic (intolerant) reactionse.g., serotonin syndrome to opioids, antidepressants; digoxin toxicity
Side effectse.g., bronchospasm to -blocker in hypertensive patient; dry mouth to antidepressants
Majority of ADRs
Common
Predictable
Usually dose dependent
Related to pharmacologic reaction of drug
Low mortality
B. Bizarreb (see Fig. )
Immunologic reactions
Idiosyncratic reactions
Pseudoallergy
Intolerance
Relatively uncommon
Unpredictable
Rarely dose dependentc
Unrelated to drugs pharmacologic action
High mortality
C. Chronic (continuous) effects
Corticosteroid-induced suppression of hypothalmicpituitaryadrenal axis
Renal papillary necrosis caused by phenacetin
Uncommon
Cumulative dose and long-term exposure required
D. Delayed effects
Carcinogenesis
Teratogenesise.g., vaginal adenocarcinoma induced by diethylstilbestrol
Time-related. Apparent some time after drug exposure
Uncommon
Usually dose-related
E. End-of-treatment effects (withdrawal effects)
Opiate withdrawal syndrome
-Blocker withdrawal
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships»

Look at similar books to Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships»

Discussion, reviews of the book Drug Allergy: Clinical Aspects, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Structure-Activity Relationships and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.