• Complain

Gilmore - Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives

Here you can read online Gilmore - Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2019;2017, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Gilmore Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives
  • Book:
    Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Columbia University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019;2017
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In 1991, Anita Hill brought testimony and scandal into Americas living rooms during televised Senate confirmation hearings in which she detailed the sexual harassment she had suffered at the hands of Clarence Thomas. The male Senate Judiciary Committee refused to take Hill seriously, and the veracity of Hills claims were sullied in the mainstream media. Hill was defamed as a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty, and Thomas was confirmed. The tainting of Hill and her testimony are part of a larger social history in which women find themselves caught up in a system that refuses to believe what they say. The Anita Hill case shows how a tainted witness is not who someone is, but what someone can become. Tainted Witness elucidates how persistent and pernicious patterns of doubt attach to women who bring forward accounts of sexual and racial violence.

Gilmore: author's other books


Who wrote Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents
TAINTED WITNESS GENDER AND CULTURE GENDER AND CULTURE A SERIES OF COLUMBIA - photo 1
TAINTED WITNESS
GENDER AND CULTURE
GENDER AND CULTURE
A SERIES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
Nancy K. Miller and Victoria Rosner, Series Editors
Carolyn G. Heilbrun (19262003) and Nancy K. Miller, Founding Editors
For a full list of titles in this series, see
TAINTED WITNESS
WHY WE DOUBT
What Women Say
ABOUT THEIR LIVES
LEIGH GILMORE
Columbia University Press
New York
Picture 2
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2017 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-54344-6
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Gilmore, Leigh, 1959 author.
Title: Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives/Leigh Gilmore.
Description: New York: Columbia University Press, [2016] | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016033453 | ISBN 9780231177146 (cloth: alk. paper) | ISBN 9780231543446 (e-book)
Subjects: LCSH: Sex discrimination against womenLaw and legislation. | Sex discriminationLaw and legislation. | Sex discrimination in criminal justice administration. | WitnessesPublic opinion. | CrimeSex differences. | WomenCrimes againstPublic opinion. | False testimony. | Feminist theory.
Classification: LCC K3243 .G55 2016 | DDC 342.7308/78dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016033453
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
Cover design: Mary Ann Smith
FOR GILLIAN WHITLOCK
Picture 3
CONTENTS
T his project developed over more than a decades interest in autobiographical practices, cultural processes of judgment, and histories of testimony. It has traveled with me as I have moved from Ohio to California and back to Boston, and I owe a debt of gratitude to those who have stayed with me through these transitions, as well as those who have welcomed me to new places. At Ohio State University, where this work began, I thank Nick Howe, and remember him here, Jennifer Terry, Luke Wilson, and Dorothy Roberts for conversations that helped me to launch this project. Jim Phelan, Sandra Macpherson, Wendy Hesford, and Jared Gardner offered encouragement, often through their own fine work. I presented early drafts of some of the chapters during visiting appointments at UC Santa Cruz and UC Berkeley. I thank Judith Butler, Michael Lucey, Charis Thompson, Gayle Salamon, Carla Freccero, Jim Clifford, and Donna Haraway for their generosity. Other parts of the project took shape during visiting appointments and in conversation with Linda Blum, Laura Greene, Carla Kaplan, and Suzanna Walters at Northeastern University; with Amy Hollywood, Frank Clooney, and Ann Braude at Harvard Divinity School; and with Phillip Gould at Brown University. Many thanks to hosts and interlocutors who generously engaged with work in progress, including Teresa Brus at Wroclaw University in Poland, Clare Brant and Max Saunders at Kings College in London, Sidonie Smith at University of Michigan, Kathleen Woodward at University of Washington, and meetings of the International Association of Autobiography and Biography in Sussex, Puerto Rico, and Michigan. I am especially grateful for Sidonie Smiths invitation to speak at the Presidential Forum at the MLA in Los Angeles in 2011 and to share that conversation with others whose work is important to mine, including Hillary Chute and Gillian Whitlock. I am grateful to Sid for a career-long intellectual conversation that has enriched and expanded every aspect of my understanding of life writing. I thank Julia Watson, with whom I too briefly overlapped at Ohio State, for the inspiration of her expansive archive. I thank Sid and Julia for their invitation to offer a keynote in Ann Arbor at a meeting of the IABA-Americas chapter. I have been inspired by the work of and conversations with Marcia Aldrich. My colleagues in life writing have pressed my thinking forward and dazzled me by the sheer range of their scholarly commitments; thanks especially to Craig Howes, Margaretta Jolly, Julie Rak, Anna Polletti, Kate Douglass, Laurie MacNeill, Eva Karpinksi, Laura Lyons, Cynthia Franklin, and John Zuern. Thanks to Lauren Berlant for the inspiration of her scholarship. Thanks also to a new generation of scholars whose thinking enlivens my own, including Joss Greene, Amulya Mandava, Jenell Navarro, Jose Navarro, and Surya Parekh. I thank my friends Shea Wilson, Matthew Sutton, Meredith Greiner, Pam Dickinson, Casey Near, Alejandra Kramer, and Robert and Anne Van Cleve. A special thanks to Brian and Patrice Taylor for respite under the oaks and design advice. Many thanks to those who welcomed us back to Boston, especially Bill and Helen Pounds, Morgan Mead, Bob and Alison Murchison, and Marlene Kenney and Josh Gray. I thank my editors, Nancy K. Miller and Victoria Rosner, for their skill and enthusiasm. I am especially grateful for the model of feminist collegiality and professionalism enacted by them and the director of Columbia University Press, Jennifer Crewe. I am honored that this book is included in a series I greatly admire. The anonymous readers of this manuscript took extraordinary care in their responses and greatly improved its final shape. They have my abiding gratitude. Closer to home, I thank my family, Tom, Finn, and William for support, patience, and lively engagement. I offer special thanks to Beth Marshall who stood guard over this project from its inception and who has read every word with her keen editorial acumen.
The dedication honors a decades-long, continent-spanning intellectual and personal friendship with Gillian Whitlock, my brilliant interlocutor and steadfast editor. Writing is solitary work, but what feeds it draws on personal wells of encouragement, shared interest, and honesty. I thank Gillian for all of these.
Some of the thinking in this project builds on work that was published previously. I gratefully acknowledge permission to include revised versions of the following articles:
What Was I? Literary Witness and the Testimonial Imperative. Profession (2011): 7784.
American Neoconfessional: Memoirs, Self-Help, and Redemption on Oprahs Couch. Biography 33, no. 4 (Fall 2010): 65779.
Jurisdictions: I, Rigoberta Mench, The Kiss, and Scandalous Self-Representation in the Age of Memoir and Trauma. Signs 28, no. 2 (Winter 2002): 695719.
The past is neither inert nor given. The stories we tell about what happened then, the correspondences we discern between today and times past, and the ethical and political stakes of these stories redound in the present.
SAIDIYA HARTMAN, LOSE YOUR MOTHER: A JOURNEY ALONG THE ATLANTIC SLAVE ROUTE
This book examines a series of contentious cases in which the conventional association of women with lying ignited the fire of scandal and provided an ample supply of incendiary material in the form of the suppressed histories of slavery and colonialism for it to burn brightly. In the conflagration of scandal, women who bore witness were besmirched even as those who distorted their testimony presented their bias as if it were illuminating and rational. However, even as these cases migrate from scandal to yesterdays news, womens testimony continues to move in pursuit of new venues, jurisdictions, and publics where it may bear witness anew.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives»

Look at similar books to Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives»

Discussion, reviews of the book Tainted witness: why we doubt what women say about their lives and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.