• Complain

Mansfield David - A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan

Here you can read online Mansfield David - A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: Oxford University Press, Inc, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Mansfield David A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan
  • Book:
    A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press, Inc
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Oscillations in opium poppy production in Afghanistan have long been associated with how the state was perceived, such as after the Taliban imposed a cultivation ban in 2000-1.The international communitys subsequent attempts to regulate opium poppy became intimately linked with its own state-building project, and rising levels of cultivation were cited as evidence of failure by those international donors who spearheaded development in poppy-growing provinces like Helmand, Nangarhar and Kandahar.Mansfields book examines why drug control - particularly opium bans - have been imposed in Afghanistan; he documents the actors involved; and he scrutinizes how prohibition served divergent and competing interests. Drawing on almost two decades of fieldwork in rural areas, he explains how these bans affected farming communities, and how prohibition endured in some areas while in others opium production bans undermined livelihoods and destabilized the political order, fuelling violence and rural rebellion.Above all this book challenges how we have come to understand political power in rural Afghanistan. Far from being the passive recipients of violence by state and non-state actors, Mansfield highlights the role that rural communities have played in shaping the political terrain, including establishing the conditions under which they could persist with opium production.Tags: Social Science, Political Science, Developing & Emerging Countries, World, Asian

Mansfield David: author's other books


Who wrote A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
A State Built on Sand How Opium Undermined Afghanistan - image 1
A STATE BUILT ON SAND

DAVID MANSFIELD

A State Built on Sand
How Opium Undermined Afghanistan

A State Built on Sand How Opium Undermined Afghanistan - image 2

A State Built on Sand How Opium Undermined Afghanistan - image 3

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

OxfordNew York

AucklandCape TownDar es SalaamHong KongKarachi
Kuala LumpurMadridMelbourneMexico CityNairobi
New DelhiShanghaiTaipeiToronto

With offices in
ArgentinaAustriaBrazilChileCzech RepublicFranceGreece
GuatemalaHungaryItalyJapanPolandPortugalSingapore
South KoreaSwitzerlandThailandTurkeyUkraineVietnam

Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.

Published in the United States of America by
Oxford University Press

198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016

Copyright David Mansfield 2016

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available David Mansfield

A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan.

ISBN: 9780190608316
eISBN: 9780190694715

To

Joanne, Ben and Nathan

CONTENTS

This book would not have been possible without the support of a lot of different people. Most notable is the European Commission and their generous support to the Afghan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). Giacomo Miserocchi at the European Commission (EC) stands out in particular as someone who fundamentally believed that documenting almost two decades of fieldwork in Afghanistan and experience in the drugs policy world was a useful exercise that needed support. AREU and its staff have helped in the completion of this task and provided long-term support to my fieldwork in rural Afghanistan.

There are others who have supported my research over an extended number of years: individuals in a range of institutions who stand out for their commitment to developing a more detailed understanding of how policies and programmes were working on the ground in Afghanistan. Many did this despite knowing that senior managers or other agencies were not always keen to know or be presented with evidence of impact. These individuals shall remain anonymous here but I am forever thankful for the funding they have provided and the support they gave to simply documenting the lives and livelihoods of rural Afghans without any desire to influence the findings of the research.

In terms of the substantive part of the work in Afghanistan, particular thanks go to my colleagues and now close friends at the Organisation for Sustainable Development and Research (OSDR) who have spent a considerable amount of time with me in rural Afghanistan, enduring my predilection for asking far too many questions. The support given by Hajji Sultan Mohammed Ahmady, Ghulam Rasool, Hajji Hasti Gul and Azizullah for well over a decade is immeasurable. They have been patient throughout and have kept me out of trouble on many occasions. I am truly thankful for their com mitment and friendship over such an extended period of time. There are a number of other colleagues at OSDR, individuals who live and work in some of the most insecure parts of the country and who have shown such generosity in sharing their time and knowledge. None of this work would have been possible without them.

There are also Richard Brittan and the team at Alcis Ltd, particularly Matt Angell, Dilip Wagh and Tim Buckley. The work they do with geospatial imagery and analysis is truly pioneering, and when combined with well focused fieldwork and a detailed understanding of the ground, it can provide an unrivalled understanding of the nature of change in the lives and livelihoods of the population in some of the most conflict-affected parts of Afghanistan.

There is a group of colleagues who have offered considerable advice and input on the numerous papers that I have written over the past eighteen consecutive growing seasons. Special thanks go to Michael Alexander, Rory Brown, William Byrd, Pierre Arnaud Chouvy, Matt Dupee, Pierre Fallavier, Paul Fishstein, Anthony Fitzherbert, Tom Franey, Arunn Jegan, David Macdonald, Dipali Mukhopadhyay, Ronald Neumann, Ian Patterson, Ghulam Rasool and Richard Will. These individuals have put a considerable amount of time into providing comments, and their insights are much appreciated. The work is so much better for their contributions.

My good friend and academic supervisor Jonathan Goodhand also merits particular thanks with regard to the substantive part of my work and its evolution over the last decade. Jonathan has always been patient and supportive, as well as tolerant of my failure to meet deadlines. He has constantly pressed me to look beyond the findings of my last piece of fieldwork and pointed me in the direction of wider literature and ideas that have proved to be invaluable for developing a better understanding of the complex reasons why opium bans endure in one area and collapse in others. I have learned a lot from our work together.

Of course there are also the countless farmers and rural communities that have welcomed me and my colleagues over the last eighteen years of fieldwork. They have shared their time, their experiences and the details of their lives and livelihoods, and have shown incredible hospitality despite many having so little to spare. Some have warned us of security problems, even imminent dangers, and for that I will be eternally grateful.

There are others who have been instrumental to the body of work that makes up this book, providing support at critical junctures: Michael Alexander, David Macdonald and Richard Will, partners in crime during those formative years at the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, UNODC; Michael Ryder, Peter Holland, Guy Warrington, Andy Smith, Dave Belgrove, Ian Patterson, Robert Magowan and Tom Franey for their unwavering commitment to doing the best job possible; I learned a lot from them during my time at the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and they made the experience so much more pleasant than it could have been and it subsequently became; Christoph Berg at GTZ, a person who was ahead of his time and willing to press for a different approach to rural development in drug crop-producing and abandon the concept of alternative development despite the fact that to do so would not serve his interests; Paul Fishstein and Andrew Wilder for establishing the foundations for the empirical work at the Afghan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), and along with Nigel Pont their support while in Boston; Robert Vierkant and Said Maqsoudi of the US Department of Defence for much needed support in writing up work on the Taliban ban and some of my old field notes; Jean Luc Lemahieu at UNODC for the dinners and all the entertaining and informative debates we have had on the drugs issue in Afghanistan over the course of many years; finally, Rory Stewart and the Kennedy School for their invitation to undertake a fellowship at Harvard, which led to new opportunities in Boston for me and my family, for which we will always be thankful.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan»

Look at similar books to A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan»

Discussion, reviews of the book A State Built on Sand: How Opium Undermined Afghanistan and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.