• Complain

Nancy Gonlin (editor) - Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology

Here you can read online Nancy Gonlin (editor) - Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2015, publisher: University Press of Colorado, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University Press of Colorado
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This volume explores the dynamics of human adaptation to social, political, ideological, economic, and environmental factors in Mesoamerica and includes a wide array of topics, such as the hydrological engineering behind Teotihuacans layout, the complexities of agriculture and sustainability in the Maya lowlands, and the nuanced history of abandonment among different lineages and households in Maya centers.

The authors aptly demonstrate how culture is the mechanism that allows people to adapt to a changing world, and they address how ecological factors, particularly land and water, intersect with nonmaterial and material manifestations of cultural complexity. Contributors further illustrate the continuing utility of the cultural ecological perspective in framing research on adaptations of ancient civilizations.

This book celebrates the work of Dr. David Webster, an influential Penn State archaeologist and anthropologist of the Maya region, and highlights human adaptation in Mesoamerica through the scientific lenses of anthropological archaeology and cultural ecology.
Contributors include Elliot M. Abrams, Christopher J. Duffy, Susan Toby Evans, Kirk D. French, AnnCorinne Freter, Nancy Gonlin, George R. Milner, Zachary Nelson, Deborah L. Nichols, David M. Reed, Don S. Rice, Prudence M. Rice, Rebecca Storey, Kirk Damon Straight, David Webster, Stephen L. Whittington, Randolph J. Widmer, John D. Wingard, and W. Scott Zeleznik.

Nancy Gonlin (editor): author's other books


Who wrote Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica Human Adaptation in Ancient - photo 1
Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica
Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica
Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology
Edited by Nancy Gonlin and Kirk D. French
University Press of Colorado
Boulder
2016 by University Press of Colorado
Published by University Press of Colorado
5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C
Boulder, Colorado 80303
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology - image 2The University Press of Colorado is a proud member of Association of American University Presses.
The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State University, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Regis University, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, Utah State University, and Western State Colorado University.
This paper meets the requirements of the ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
ISBN: 978-1-60732-391-4 (cloth)
ISBN: 978-1-60732-392-1 (e-book)
The University Press of Colorado gratefully acknowledges the generous support of The Pennsylvania State University toward the publication of this book.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Human adaptation in ancient Mesoamerica / edited by Nancy Gonlin and Kirk D. French.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-1-60732-391-4 (cloth : alkaline paper) ISBN 978-1-60732-392-1 (ebook)
1. MayasSocial conditions. 2. MayasAntiquities. 3. Human ecologyMexicoHistoryTo 1500. 4. Human ecologyCentral AmericaHistoryTo 1500. 5. Social archaeologyMexico. 6. Social archaeologyCentral America. 7. Environmental archaeologyMexico. 8. Environmental archaeologyCentral America. 9. MexicoAntiquities. 10. Central AmericaAntiquities. I. Gonlin, Nancy. II. French, Kirk D.
F1435.3.S68H86 2015
972.81'01dc23
2014050139
25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Cover photograph: Dr. David Webster and Don Santos Rosa confer on the next steps in excavating the corner of Structures 9N-82 (House of the Bacabs) and 9N-83 at Copan, Honduras, in the ancient neighborhood of Las Sepulturas (photo by Elliot Abrams, December 1980).
To David Webster
Extraordinary anthropologist,
exceptional archaeologist,
inspiring mentor, life-long friend
Contents

George R. Milner
Nancy Gonlin and Kirk D. French
Kirk D. French and Nancy Gonlin
Susan Toby Evans and Deborah L. Nichols
Kirk D. French and Christopher J. Duffy
John D. Wingard
AnnCorinne Freter and Elliot M. Abrams
Stephen L. Whittington and Nancy Gonlin
Randolph J. Widmer and Rebecca Storey
David M. Reed and W. Scott Zeleznik
Zachary Nelson
Kirk Damon Straight
Don S. Rice and Prudence M. Rice
David Webster
Figures

Tables

Foreword

GEORGE R. MILNER
When asked to write an introductory piece, I was not entirely sure what could possibly be added to this already fine collection of essays. The editors provided few instructions, other than that as head of Penn States anthropology department I should say something about the archaeology program, and as one of David Websters colleagues for upwards of 30 years it would be appropriate to highlight some of his contributions to archaeology.
So I suppose the title of Davids chapter, Two Katun Archaeologist, is as good a place to start as any. While appropriately enough referring to the Maya, it has been my experience that he is more interested in the Great Game and the other happenings, preoccupations, and follies of imperialism, which serve as fine examples of how institutions work (or dont), and the often serendipitous unfolding of human history that, more often than not, is little more than one misadventure after another. At least that is what we are forever talking about in his office or mine, although that might just reflect my tenuous grasp of Mesoamerican prehistory. But it also underscores Davids wide, almost encyclopedic, knowledge of human affairs, institutions, and history (extending into deep prehistory) derived from extensive reading, travel, and reflection.
To establish my credentials for the task at hand, I should trot out my sole entry into the vast, thought-provoking, and provocative, if not always believable, Mesoamerican literature ( Buikstra et al. 2006 ). David had a hand in this work, if only as an interested bystander. A number of years ago when Jesper L. Boldsen (University of Southern Denmark) and I were developing a better means of skeletal age estimation for adults, my former doctoral advisor, Jane E. Buikstra, contacted me because she was heading off to Palenque to look at a skeleton. In due course she sent me her observations of the pubic symphysis, the best part of the skeleton for aging purposes, along with a photograph. When I received them, I had no idea that a controversy swirled around this skeletons age and identity. It just so happened that David walked by my office shortly after Jesper and I calculated the individuals age, which took work on both sides of the Atlantic. When told about the result, David reacted with surprise and pleasure because the maximum likelihood estimate was within a few years of the glyph-derived age, which, until our conversation, was unknown to me. He also explained who the mysterious Pakal was, and that archaeologists were divided over whether the skeleton was his or not.
This was one of those rare occasions when a single result clearly distinguishes among competing ideas. There were several alternatives that, to an outsider like myself, might be possible, if not equally plausible: the original skeletal age estimates were wide of the mark, somebody elses body was placed in Pakals tomb, the glyph age was deliberately misleading, or the glyph age was mistranslated. As it turns out, the individual buried in the tomb was indeed an old man, so existing age estimates were in error, as they were too young. That comes as no surprise because standard procedures produce biased results, so the true ages of people from roughly their fifties onward are underestimated. In addition, they fail to provide a means of doing anything with individuals thought to be old, other than lumping them into a terminal, open-ended interval (e.g., 50+ years). So perhaps the skeleton really was Pakal. Going that far, however, rests squarely on the consistency of all available evidence: the age and sex of the skeleton, burial offerings, tomb characteristics and location, and glyphs. In this instance, the data are mutually supportive and point in one direction, meaning we can be reasonably happy with the interpretation.
The last point will strike a chord with anyone who knows David. He is always saying that the best inferences are those that are based on multiple lines of evidence. Claims that new findings overturn long-established interpretations are common in our field. Sometimes that actually is the case, which is gratifying because present understandings should always be questioned in light of additional information and improved methods. Unfortunately, new findings that supposedly have revolutionary implications are often found wanting upon further reflection. That is because of technical problems, which were not initially fully understood, or poor sampling, especially the number and representativeness of the materials examined.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology»

Look at similar books to Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology»

Discussion, reviews of the book Human Adaptation in Ancient Mesoamerica: Empirical Approaches to Mesoamerican Archaeology and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.