• Complain

Jay Kent Dow - Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System

Here you can read online Jay Kent Dow - Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. publisher: University Press of Kansas, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University Press of Kansas
  • Genre:
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In the United States we elect members of the House of Representative from single-member districts: the candidate who receives the most votes from each geographically defined district wins a seat in the House. This system--so long in place that it seems perfectly natural--is, however, unusual. Most countries use proportional representation to elect their legislatures. Electing the House is the first book-length study to explore how the US came to adopt the single-member district system, how it solidified into a seemingly permanent fixture of American government and whether it performs well by the standards it was intended to achieve.
The US Constitution grants the states the authority to elect representatives in a manner of their own choosing, subject to restrictions that Congress might impose. Electing the House reminds us that in the nations early years the states exercised this privilege and elected their representatives using a variety of methods. Dow traces the general adoption of the present system to the Jacksonian Era--specifically to the major franchise expansion and voter mobilization of the time. The single-member district plurality-rule system was the Federalists solution to tyranny of the majority under the expectation of universal franchise, and the Jacksonian-Whigs-Era response to the political uncertainty caused by large-scale voter mobilization. The system was solidified concurrently with the enfranchisement of women in the early twentieth century and African Americans in the Civil Rights Era. Dow persuasively argues that the single-member district system became the way that we elect our representatives because it fits especially well within the corpus of political thought that informs our collective understanding of good governance and it performs well by the standards it was meant to achieve, and these standards are still relevant today.
Locating the development of single-member district system within the context of American political thought, Dows study clarifies the workings and the significance of a critical electoral process in our time. In the process, the book informs and enhances our understanding of the evolution of the American political system.

Jay Kent Dow: author's other books


Who wrote Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Electing the House Electing the House The Adoption and Performance of the US - photo 1
Electing the House
Electing the House
The Adoption and Performance of the US Single-Member District Electoral System
Jay K. Dow
2017 by the University Press of Kansas All rights reserved Published by the - photo 2
2017 by the University Press of Kansas
All rights reserved
Published by the University Press of Kansas (Lawrence, Kansas 66045), which was organized by the Kansas Board of Regents and is operated and funded by Emporia State University, Fort Hays State University, Kansas State University, Pittsburg State University, the University of Kansas, and Wichita State University
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Dow, Jay K. (Jay Kent), 1962 author.
Title: Electing the House : the adoption and performance of the US single-member district electoral system / Jay Kent Dow.
Description: Laurence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016047597
ISBN 9780700624096 (cloth : acid free paper)
ISBN 9780700624102 (pbk. : acid free paper)
ISBN 9780700624119 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: United States. Congress. HouseElection districtsHistory.
Classification: LCC JK1341 .D69 2017 | DDC 328.73/07345dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016047597.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data is available.
Printed in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The paper used in this publication is recycled and contains 30 percent postconsumer waste. It is acid free and meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials z39.481992.
CONTENTS
ILLUSTRATIONS
Image and Figures
Tables
PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The idea for this book took shape when I was privileged to attend two Jack Miller Center Summer Institutes on teaching Americas founding principles and history. I was surprised by my inclusion in the programs because, although I taught a class in founding-era political thought at the University of Missouri, I had made my academic career on statistical studies of electoral systems in contemporary elections. These institute conversations with some of the leading graduate students and faculty in American political thought and development made me realize that I couldnt provide a satisfactory answer to the simple question of how and why we came to elect the House of Representatives as we do. Ive always believed one of the primary benefits of the academic profession is that one can pursue ones intellectual interests wherever they lead, and my interests were shifting from the contemporary performance and political implications of election systems to understanding their origins and development. I had been recently promoted to full professor and was in a good position to read and learn as much as I could about the political thought on elections in the early republic, American political development, and the long history of congressional elections. This book is the beginning of that process.
On its face my academic pedigree suggests that Im best suited for my original vocation of statistical analyses of electoral systems. I completed my dissertation under the guidance of Mel Hinich at the University of Texas at Austin, and Mel was one of the most accomplished scholars of his generation in this field of inquiry. However, I was also greatly influenced by Walter Dean Burnham, and his presence is felt throughout the manuscript. Dean Burnham taught me many things, including that one needs to understand history to place empirical findings in context and that one can gain great insights from very basic electoral data and simple analysis. This book owes much to Dean Burnhams influence a full quarter-century after I last took a seminar from him.
More immediately, I am deeply indebted to the University of Missouri Kinder Institute on Constitutional Democracy for providing financial assistance that allowed me to conduct research at Chicagos Newberry Library and, more importantly, for creating a campus-wide network of scholars interested in basic questions of US constitutional governance. The Kinder Institute provides a forum for the collaboration and discussion of ideas among scholars from different academic backgrounds and perspectives, all of whom share a deep commitment to constitutional democracy and the American polity. In this, I owe particular acknowledgments to my colleagues Justin Dyer and historian of the early republic Jeff Pasley. Professors Dyer and Pasley codirect the Kinder Institute and were instrumental in establishing the intellectual environment where I could discuss the ideas in this book. I am also indebted to Pev Squire, who shared his considerable expertise on the development of American legislatures as I pursued my inquiry on their election. These conversations in conferences, colloquia, seminars, and department hallways moved this project forward in a way that would not have been possible otherwise. I also benefited from the assistance of the University of Missouri Research Council, which granted me a research leave to write. The Research Council also funded my work at the National Archives Center for Legislative Archives, where I obtained material that provided richer context for several chapters. In acknowledging Research Council support, I am simultaneously recognizing the assistance of my former department chair, John Petrocik. This gentleman had to support me and the project for it to secure institutional backing, and I very much appreciate his effort on my behalf.
Finally, the most significant acknowledgments and deepest expressions of gratitude go to my family, including daughters Rachelle and Laurel and, especially, my wife, Debbie. Debbie did not marry a scholar. She married a guy barely out of high school who over the course of our thirty-five-year marriage slowly became one. Her patience and support in this process is incalculable and extends well beyond anything specific to this project. For that and everything else I am profoundly grateful.
House of Representatives Elections and American Political Development
We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists.
Thomas Jefferson, first inaugural address
The United States elects its House of Representatives from single-member districts using the plurality rule. This method selects the candidate with the most votes, even if less than a majority, from a geographically contiguous district. This electoral system is an anomaly. For most of the world, an electoral systemthe rules by which citizens votes are translated into legislative seatsmeans proportional representation. Of the worlds approximately thirty or so established and unquestioned democracies, only fourthe United Kingdom, India, Canada, and the United Statesrely exclusively on single-member district (SMD) plurality rule to elect their national legislature. For the United States perhaps the more striking fact is that nowhere is this mandated. The Constitution grants the states the authority to elect representatives in the manner of their choosing, subject to restrictions that Congress may choose to impose.
In the nations early years the states exercised this privilege and elected their representatives using a variety of methods. For example, New Jersey elected its representatives at-large for the first five congresses, then changed to SMD, then reinstituted at-large elections, and finally opted for dual-member-district elections (DMD) from 1812 to 1814, after which it used at-large elections. Vermonts representatives were elected from single-member districts until the Thirteenth Congress, when the state switched to at-large elections, until the Seventeenth Congress when it used single-member districts for one cycle before reinstating at-large elections. New York relied on SMD during much of this period, but created some multimember constituencies in the early nineteenth century. In contrast, Virginia relied exclusively on SMD elections to elect its representatives in the early republic. The Virginia exception aside, fluidity in House election methods was the rule, not the exception, in the nations early years. Congress eventually asserted its prerogative in the mid-nineteenth century and required states to elect their representatives from single-member districts. This practice, now as much by tradition as by law, is well established.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System»

Look at similar books to Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System»

Discussion, reviews of the book Electing the House: The Adoption and Performance of the U.S. Single-member District Electoral System and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.