• Complain

Tom Hayes - No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling

Here you can read online Tom Hayes - No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2009, publisher: Penguin Publishing Group, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Penguin Publishing Group
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2009
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Todays markets have splintered into millions of powerful consumer communities how can businesses adapt?

Its no secret that traditional mass marketing network television, newspapers, direct mailis dying. Consumer markets are increasingly fragmented, even as they become more connected, transparent, and global. The future of business is about penetrating selfforming niches, from affinity groups on Facebook to thousands of satellite channels and millions of private online communities.

So how can businesses reach new customers, win their trust, and earn their loyalty? Tom Hayes and Michael S. Malone urge an entirely new approach, embracing small, trust-based online groups as powerful vehicles for creating customers and gathering invaluable feedback. But what they call marketing 3.0 isnt as simple as setting up a YouTube channel.

Drawing on many case studies, the authors offer a new set of tools for a world where attention is harder than ever to capture, but even more lucrative to hold. They explain how to use social media for a new kind of marketingbottom-up instead of top-down, personal rather than public, subtle rather than full frontal.

The payoff is a return to the power of oldfashioned handsellingturbocharged by bleedingedge technology.

Tom Hayes: author's other books


Who wrote No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents For Emerson who came to us from the stars and - photo 1
Table of Contents

For Emerson who came to us from the stars and Greg who returned to - photo 2
For
Emerson, who came to us from the stars,
and
Greg, who returned to them
TH

To
The people of Silicon Valley
who always remind us that it is possible to
reinvent yourself and remain forever competitive
MSM
INTRODUCTION
Ex Uno Plures (From One, Many)
In 1971, European social scientist Henry Tajfel set out to discover just what little impetus was needed for individuals to spontaneously attach themselves to newly created ad hoc groups.
The experiment was elegant in its simplicity:
Participants, who were 14- and 15-year-old boys, were brought into the lab and shown slides of paintings by Klee and Kandin-sky. They were told their preferences for the paintings would determine which of two groups they would join.
Of course, this was a lie designed to set up the idea of us and them in their minds. The experimenters wanted two groups of boys with not the faintest idea who was also in their own group or what the grouping meant or what they had to lose or gain.
After this setup, the boys were taken to a cubicle, one at a time. Each was then asked to distribute virtual money to the other members of both groups. The only information they had about who they were giving it to was a code number for each boy and that boys group membership.
There were a series of rules for the distribution of the money that were designed to tease out who the boys favored: their own group or the other group. The rules were changed slightly in different trials so that it was possible to test a number of theories.
The result?
From the way the virtual money was distributed, the boys did indeed demonstrate the classic behavioral markers of group membership: they favored their own group over the other. And this pattern developed consistently over many, many trials and has subsequently been replicated in other experiments in which groups were, if you can believe it, even more minimal.
In other words, given a topic in which they had no interest, after an exposure of just thirty seconds, in an environment in which there were no consequences to their choices, the boys still based their decisions upon a perceived membership in a group whose membership list they didnt know. And subsequent tests show that these subjects would exhibit group loyalty based upon even less information than that.
The results of Tajfels experiments, which have been reproduced many times since, tell us something truly profound about human nature and our deep, organic need to connect with one another. But these results are also a window into the puzzle that has become the modern global economy. It is this irresistible need to connect with one anotherat times against all reasonthat more than anything will define the next few decades. And it is this deep impulse, atavistically returning at a time when we find ourselves both unmoored from tradition and overwhelmed by choice and opportunity, that is sending history spinning off in an unexpected direction and making a hash of even the most logical prognostications.
No Size Fits All From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling - image 3
We humans are social beings, best suited for small groups of trustworthy compatriots. Todays technologythe Internet in particularallows us not only to communicate, but to form new types of social constructs based on ancient impulses. Everywhere you look people are connecting, collaborating, and competing in new ways. And yet, we are also using the Internet to destroy what has come beforeinstitutions (e.g., libraries, video shops, bookstores), intermediaries (record companies, movie theaters), and traditions (the morning paper, the evening news).
What we seem to have forgotten as we looked out across the rapidly changing landscape of the digital revolution is that if you disestablish the institutions that have provided security and succor to humanity for centuries, if you provide a nearly infinite number of options for people and empower individuals with unprecedented control over their own lives, the resulting psychological vacuum will drive most people to pull together into new groupings and to establish brand-new institutions that are a better fit for this changing reality. When challenged, humanity doesnt link arms, but huddles into small, trusted groups.
If we keep this impulse in mind, a lot of the unexpected phenomena of the last few years suddenly become a lot clearer.
For example, consider the single most important new business movement of our time: Web 2.0, the so-called social network companies. The best known of these are Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, LinkedIn, Craigslist, and a handful of other giants; but there are tens of thousands more, and they increasingly dominate entire industry sectors, such as video, photography, classified advertising, and professional societies.
With a few exceptions, these are businesses that have never been able to precisely elucidate the service they deliverat least not to the degree of traditional manufacturers or even service companies. And yet, several are among the fastest growing enterprises in business history. For example, MySpace, which was founded as recently as 2003, currently has more than 270 million members. Craigslist, which began as a San Francisco Bay Area online swap meet, has in less than a decade all but captured the classified advertising business of the three-centuries-old newspaper industry.
Yet, ask any of the millions of users of these Web 2.0 companies to describe exactly what business those companies are inand how they make money from itand nearly all would be hard-pressed to give an answer... even though for many their Facebook profile is their single most important connection to the outside world, and they Twitter on their cell phones twenty times a day.
Clearly something more elemental is going on here. These services, and more important our relationship to them, are touching a deep chord in our psyches. As we have just seen in the Tajfel research, that subconscious need is to belong to some group that is larger than ourselves, even if we dont know any of the other members, even if it is based upon the thinnest of commonalities, and even if there is no obvious reward other than membership itself.
So why not just go back to the venerable institutions we have so recently abandoned? Well, if all that these new Web 2.0 enterprises offered was anonymous membership, we probably would. But the genius of the best Web 2.0 companies is that they have learned to use the unique capabilities of the Internet to maximize freedom, individuality, and membership in a small coterie of friends and acquaintancesall within the context of being part of a vast social movement. In other words, as a user you get the best of both worlds: the independence promised by the digital revolution, yet the comfort of being among friends and part of something greater than yourself.
In the modern world, that is a psychologically unbeatable combination. And it is a harbinger of the future. In the years to come, we citizens of the Internet Age will continue to use our new tools to shatter one traditional institution after anothergovernmental, commercial, cultural, social, religiousthen turn around and self-sort and segregate ourselves by our affinities, obsessions, and passions. Thanks to the power of our new communications technologies, these new groupings may range in size from a handful of people to hundreds of millions. They may disappear in a matter of minutes or endure for decades. And they may briefly coalesce around a momentary notion or may explode into a massive social or political movement.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling»

Look at similar books to No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling»

Discussion, reviews of the book No Size Fits All: From Mass Marketing to Mass Handselling and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.