• Complain

Shirley Chisholm - The Good Fight

Here you can read online Shirley Chisholm - The Good Fight full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2022, publisher: HarperCollins, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Shirley Chisholm The Good Fight
  • Book:
    The Good Fight
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    HarperCollins
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Good Fight: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Good Fight" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The revered civil rights activist and pioneering member of Congress chronicles her groundbreaking 1972 run for President as the first woman and person of colora work of immense historical importance that both captures and transcends its times, newly reissued to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of her campaign.

Before Kamala Harris, before Hillary Rodham Clinton there was Shirley Chisholm. In 1972, the Congresswoman from New Yorkthe first Black woman elected to Congressmade history again when she announced her candidacy for President of the United States. Though she understood victory was a longshot, Chisholm chose to run because someone had to do it first. . . . I ran because most people think the country is not ready for a black candidate, not ready for a woman candidate.

In this invaluable political memoir, Chisholm reflects on her unique campaign and a nation at the crossroads of change. With the striking candor and straightforward style for which she was famous, Chisholm reveals the essential wheeling and dealing inherent to campaigning, castigates the innate conservatism and piety of the Black majority of the period, decries identity politics that lead to destructive power struggles within a fractious Democratic Party, and offers prescient advice on the direction of Black politics. From the whirlwind of the primaries to the final dramatic maneuvering at the tumultuous 1972 Democratic National Convention, The Good Fight is an invaluable portrait of twentieth-century politics and a Democratic Party in flux.

Most importantly, The Good Fight is the portrait of a reformer who dedicated her life to making politics work for all Americans. Chisholm saw her campaign as an extension of her political commitment; she ran as an idealist grounded in reality who used her opportunity and position to give voice to all the forgotten. This book bears the stamp of her remarkable personality and her commitment to speaking truth no matter the consequences.

Shirley Chisholm: author's other books


Who wrote The Good Fight? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Good Fight — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Good Fight" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

T O C ONRAD C HISHOLM , MY DEVOTED HUSBAND

O NE OF THE most dismaying aspects of politics and public life in America today is the increasingly closed nature of the entire political process, particularly at the highest level. We hear much these days about the growing power of the Presidency at the expense of Congress, the lack of White House communication with the public, the virtual end of Presidential press conferences, and the secret bargaining and trading of favors in the back rooms of the powerfulall of which have repelled many people in the country. The low voter turnout in the November 1972 elections was a disturbing barometer of the air of apathy and resignation which permeates the nations political atmosphere in this new year, a terribly unhealthy sign in a democracy.

Sorrow over the deaths of two former Presidents and somber relief over the apparent halt in our massive military intervention in Southeast Asia do not seem enough to enable us to stop and blink and perhaps turn our eyes from the pastso much of which has shocked and confused Americansin hopes of starting anew and refocusing our hopes and energies toward the urgent needs of our nation.

Yet there are nonetheless positive undercurrents coursing through the lifeblood of America. A strong economic performance seems imminent, hopefully promising more jobs. The recent Supreme Court decision on abortions gives me confidence that there are indeed men of reason and basic goodwill who are prepared to make terribly difficult and profound social and moral decisions despite sharp and highly emotional opposition. Furthermore, the election of a Democratic Congress in 1972 indicates to me that most Americans want a counter to the administration and have not forgotten those humane, progressive values which some feared were lost forever as our technological society rolled on.

In response to public demand, more light is being shed on our political processon campaign financing, on convention delegate selection, and on Congressional committee operations. The recent decision by a Democratic caucus of the House to reform the seniority system may well have a significant impact on the ability of the House to respond more quickly and effectively to local and national problems.

I ran for the Presidency in order to crack a little more of the ice which in recent years has congealed to nearly immobilize our political system and demoralize people. I ran for the Presidency, despite hopeless odds, to demonstrate sheer will and refusal to accept the status quo.

It seems to me that a Presidential candidate can open the door a bit farther by discussing openly and frankly what transpired during his or her campaignthe pressures, the conflicts, the fears, the double crosses, the financial costswhile the campaign is fresh in the public mind and before the candidate reaches that autumnal time of life when the traditional memoir may be deemed suitable.

I therefore freely give my impressions of events and personalities as I perceived them during the 1972 Presidential primary campaigns. In so doing, I hope the public may better understand this grueling, often bewildering phase of our election system. Some readers may find their worst fears confirmed; others may feel compelled to participate themselves in some future campaign. Either way I feel that such a book may play a useful role in my continuing efforts to shake up our system.

February 1973, S.C.

I T WAS STRANGE that some of the people screaming the loudest were Wallace delegates with long red, white and blue neckties. One little white man kept jumping up and down; he didnt stop during the ten minutes it took for my acceptance speech. Little of the enthusiasm spread to the rostrum, though. Party chairman Larry OBrien and the other officers at the Democratic National Convention in July, 1972, were impassive. It was an odd contrast; I noticed it fleetingly as I walked to the microphone.

There was no speech prepared. I didnt need one, because there was only one thing for me to say: Brothers and sisters! At last Ive reached this spot! I dont remember my exact words. There are tape recordings somewhere, probably, for anyone who thinks the exact words matter. The placards waved, a band played, the hall was a stormy beach with waves made of people dressed in all colors, and their shouts were like the noise of an ocean. I had never seen a national convention session before except on television. State ones, yes. But the only convention I had gone to was the 1968 one in Chicago, and that was neither as a candidate nor as a delegate; when the session was nearly over I went to attend a meeting of the Democratic National Committee.

As I left my trailer behind the hall in Miami, surrounded by a ring of Secret Service men, I felt no excitement. Backstage, watching the scene on a television set until it was time to go on, I was still calm. But now this huge room was pulsing and jumping at me, so much more than I had expected. How long it went on, I could never tell. Even when I began to speak, they never really quieted down. If you had just landed from the moon, you might have thought that I was the conventions choice, not just a preliminary to the main event. I tried to focus on something and get myself together. People were leaving their seats, pushing through the chairs to the aisle below the speakers platform, where I stood behind a huge-seeming lectern. Almost everybody was applauding and cheeringeverybody except some of the McGovern delegates, who had contented themselves with a few claps. What I noticed most were the older black men and women. Some were crying, and their faces were so full of joy that they looked in pain. I thought I could read their lives experiences in their faces at that instant, and I know what it was they felt. For a moment they really believed it: We have overcome!

What I said that night was that most people had thought I would never stand there, in that place, but there I was. All the odds had been against it, right up to the end. I never blamed anyone for doubting. The Presidency is for white males. No one was ready to take a black woman seriously as a candidate. It was not time yet for a black to run, let alone a woman, and certainly not for someone who was both. Someday... but not yet. Someday the country would be ready. Those were the things I had been told, everywhere I went for ten months, even before I announced officially that I was a candidate, and everywhere I was asked the same question: But, Mrs. Chisholmare you a serious candidate? Each time, trying not to lose patience, I explained, and tonight I was explaining again.

Of course my candidacy had no chance. I had little money and no way of raising the funds it takes to run for high office. I had no big party figures supporting me. To the extent that they noticed me at all, the movers and shakers wished only that I would go away. A wild card, a random factor that might upset some detail of their plans, an intruder into the real contest among the white male candidates. Their response was ridiculein private, not in public, because a gentleman doesnt make fun of a lady and a politician doesnt want to risk losing the black vote. But their attitude came through clearly: treat her with respect, but of course you dont have to take her seriously. If they ever wondered why I was running, their explanation was usually Chisholm is on an ego trip.

So I did not devote my acceptance speech to a discussion of the issues. I had discussed the issues before. People hear about the issues from every politician who gets up on a stump. Theyve quit listening to the traditional speeches with the traditional promises. Fellow Americans, these are the great issues we must face. Fellow Americans, this is what I will do for you if you elect me. So whats new?

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Good Fight»

Look at similar books to The Good Fight. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Good Fight»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Good Fight and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.