• Complain

Philip Ball - Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another

Here you can read online Philip Ball - Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2004, publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Philip Ball Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another
  • Book:
    Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2004
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Are there any laws of nature that influence the ways in which humans behave and organize themselves? In the seventeenth century, tired of the civil war ravaging England, Thomas Hobbes decided that he would work out what kind of government was needed for a stable society. His approach was based not on utopian wishful thinking but rather on Galileos mechanics to construct a theory of government from first principles. His solution is unappealing to todays society, yet Hobbes had sparked a new way of thinking about human behavior in looking for the scientific rules of society.
Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, Auguste Comte, and John Stuart Mill pursued this idea from different political perspectives. Little by little, however, social and political philosophy abandoned a scientific approach. Today, physics is enjoying a revival in the social, political and economic sciences. Ball shows how much we can understand of human behavior when we cease to try to predict and analyze the behavior of individuals and instead look to the impact of individual decisions-whether in circumstances of cooperation or conflict-can have on our laws, institutions and customs.
Lively and compelling, Critical Mass is the first book to bring these new ideas together and to show how they fit within the broader historical context of a rational search for better ways to live.

Philip Ball: author's other books


Who wrote Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents Writing this book has often felt like a collaborative - photo 1
Table of Contents

Writing this book has often felt like a collaborative exercise, for which I am eager to spread some credit (while of course remaining accountable for all blame). For wise, perceptive, and tolerant suggestions and advice, and for the provision of materials and references, I am deeply indebted to many real experts in this arena, in particular Robert Axelrod, Robert Axtell, Albert-Laszl Barabsi, Eshel Ben-Jacob, Rama Cont, Dirk Helbing, Steve Keen, Thomas Lux, Mitsugu Matsushita, Joe McCauley, Mark Newman, Paul Ormerod, Craig Reynolds, Sorin Solomon, Gene Stanley, Alessandro Vespignani and Tams Vicsek. The support of my editors, John Glusman, Ravi Mirchandani, and Caroline Knight, has been vital, and many rough edges were knocked off the text by the careful attention of the copy editor, John Woodruff. I have been encouraged as ever by the good judgment of my agent, Peter Robinson, and the support of my wife, Julia.

Philip Ball
London, October 2003
Designing the Molecular World:
Chemistry at the Frontier

Made to Measure:
New Materials for the 21st Century

The Self-Made Tapestry:
Pattern Formation in Nature

Lifes Matrix:
A Biography of Water

Stories of the Invisible:
A Guided Tour of Molecules

Bright Earth:
Art and the Invention of Color

The Ingredients:
A Guided Tour of the Elements

The Devils Doctor:
Paracelsus and the World of Renaissance Magic and Science
PHILIP BALL
Philip Ball majored in chemistry at the University of Oxford and received a Ph.D. in physics from the University of Bristol. He is the author of Lifes Matrix (FSG, 2000); Bright Earth (FSG, 2002), which was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award; and The Devils Doctor (FSG, 2006). He lives in London with his wife.
T he performer who provides his own applause is surely either deluded or desperate; but where better than in conclusion to describe the following delightful manifestation of social physics?
In some countries and cultures, particularly in Eastern Europe, the applause with which a gratified audience expresses its appreciation of a performance tends to slew back and forth between random and synchronized. At one moment each person is clapping to his or her own rhythm, and the hundreds of overlapping pulses of sound create a continuous clattering roar like the sound of surf on shingle. But then something remarkable happens: this wash of noise resolves itself into a regular beat, as each pair of hands claps in unison with the others. The synchronization lasts for perhaps a minute or so, then dissolves again into chaos.
There is no one conducting this performance, no one to set the pace or to signal when synchrony should begin. It just happensnot once but several times during an ovation. Now, it is no great feat for two or three people to bring their hand claps into step with one another. Indeed, it can be hard for them to avoid doing so, just as two people tend to synchronize their steps when they walk side by side. But the synchronized clapping of an audience of many hundreds is a challenge of another order. That it can crystallize so quickly is surprising enough: but why, once synchronized, does the clapping not stay that way, given that each member of the audience can consciously sustain it with little effort? Why this seesawing alternation between order and chaos?
Tams Vicsek, Albert-Lszl Barabsi, and their co-workers have asked this same question. They made sound recordings of the postperformance applausein several theaters and opera halls in Hungary and Romania, and looked at how the sound volume changed as clapping veered between incoherent and synchronized. They found that although synchronized clapping produces spikes of noise that can exceed the sound level during incoherent clapping, nevertheless synchronization decreases the average noise intensity in the hall (Figure E.1).
This decrease happens not because the audience members are clapping any less vigorously when they are in step, but because they clap less often. People space their claps roughly twice as far apart in the synchronized mode than when clapping freely. This is presumably because it is harder to clap in time with everyone else if the rhythm is too fastsynchronization of a slow hand clap disintegrates if the pace quickens. No one in the audience thinks consciously about this; the measured rhythm of the synchronized clap essentially selects itself.
The researchers suggest that the difference in average sound volume explains why applause at concerts oscillates between incoherent and synchronized. An appreciative audience wants to make a lot of noise. It also appears to enjoy the communal experience of synchronized clapping, which lends the crowd a single voice. But these two things are in conflict, because synchronization results in a drop in the average noise intensity. No one registers this drop consciously; but the audience, having switched into synchronized mode, nonetheless begins to speed up the rhythm so as to restore the sound volume to its earlier, unsynchronized level. In doing so, they lose the ability to keep their claps in step, and the sychronization dissolves into incoherence. Moments later, the attractive tug of synchrony reasserts itself and the cycle repeats.
E.1 Sound levels during audience applause in an Eastern European theater. The switch from random to synchronized clapping is marked by the appearance of sharp, regularly spaced peaks in the noise intensity (top). When this happens, the average noise intensity diminishes (bottom), only to rise again as the synchronized clapping dissolves.
A push and a pull a tension between conflicting desires This is all it takes - photo 2
A push and a pull; a tension between conflicting desires. This is all it takes to tip our social behavior into complex and often unpredictable, patterns, dictated by influences beyond our immediate experience or our ability to control. Regardless of what we believe about the motivations for individual behavior, once we become part of a group we cannot be sure what to expect.
INTRODUCTION: POLITICAL ARITHMETICK
W. Petty (1690). Political Arithmetick. Robert Clavel, London.
Ibid.. Preface.
K. Waltz (1954). Man, the State, and War , p. 75. Columbia University Press, New York.
CHAPTER 1: RAISING LEVIATHAN
EPIGRAPHS

Bernard Fontenelle, quoted in A.G.R. Smith (1972). Science and Society in the 16th and 17th Centuries, p. 153. Science History Publications. New York.
Bernard Fontenelle (1686). Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds, trans. W. Gardiner (1715), pp. 1112. London.
Robert M. Maclver (1947). The Web of Government . Macmillan. New York. Quoted in R. Bier stedt, ed. (1959). The Making of Society, p. 493. Random House, New York.
Stephen Cutgrove (1967). The Science of Society, p. 181. Allen & Unwin, London.
Snorri Sturluson (thirteenth century). The Prose Edda, trans. J. I. Young (1964) (with minor changes).p.86.University of California Press, Berkeley.
J. Aubrey (1681). Brief Lives, ed. J. Buchanan-Brown (2000). pp. 427-28. Penguin. London.
T. Hobbes (1651). Leviathan, ed. C. B. Macpherson (1985), pp. 11011. Penguin, London.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another»

Look at similar books to Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another»

Discussion, reviews of the book Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.