INTRODUCTION
Two thousand years after his death Jesus of Nazareth continues to be the object of fascination, devotion and controversy. While the churches try to carry on the traditions of Christian faith, the popular news media gives ample publicity to new (and often preposterous) explanations about who Jesus really was. What gets ignored in these controversies are the solid scholarly works that place Jesus in his proper historical context and sift the evidence to arrive at a reliable and coherent interpretation of what Jesus said and did.
This book aims to state concisely and clearly for a general audience what many specialists in biblical research have learned and written about Jesus of Nazareth in recent years. It is a historical study, though it has theological significance. Historians try to understand the world of Jesus and to situate him in the context of first-century Judaism. They also act as detectives by going behind the ancient literary sources about Jesus and seeking to ascertain what can be said about him with confidence.
Why not just read the four Gospels? Of course we must read them. The Gospels and other New Testament writings answer two basic questions: Who is Jesus? and Why is he important? They remain the principal and indispensable sources of our knowledge about Jesus, and without them modern historians could say little or nothing.
However, the Gospels were written after and in the light of Easter, and their authors and first readers already believed in and revered Jesus as the Messiah, Son of God and Lord. They were composed to increase and deepen faith in the risen Jesus, not to give a precise chronicle of Jesus life on earth. They must be read on three levels: as reports about the time of the earthly Jesus, as reflections of the traditions about Jesus that were handed on in the early churches, and as finished compositions by the Evangelists. This complex process of transmission took about sixty years.
This book is mainly concerned with the time of Jesus, that is, what can be said with a high degree of probability about his life, teachings and activities during his earthly existence. It treats his historical context in Judaism, his birth and the beginnings of his ministry, what he taught and did, his attitudes toward and interactions with women and political leaders, and why and how he died. It also discusses his resurrection, the rise of devotion to him after his death and expectations about his future or second coming.
I intend this short portrait of the historical Jesus as a reliable synthesis of and a positive contribution to recent discussions and controversies about Jesus. I write as a Roman Catholic priest, a Jesuit and a professor of New Testament since 1971. In my academic research I have taken special interest in the Dead Sea Scrolls and other Jewish texts from the time of Jesus. As editor of New Testament Abstracts I see all the books and articles published in the field. There is nothing in this book that poses a threat to Christian faith and tradition. Indeed, in most cases it shows that sound historical study is consistent with orthodox Christian beliefs.
The main text of the book appeared first as a series of twelve newsletters published from March 2006 through February 2007 by St. Anthony Messenger Press under the same title as this book. It includes the sidebars (Adding to the Picture) written by Diane Houdek, as well as questions for reflection and discussion for each chapter. I have added as an appendix an essay entitled Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls and a list of what I regard as some of the best recent books on the historical Jesus. I am grateful to Judy Ball, Lisa Biedenbach and their colleagues at St. Anthony Messenger Press for their encouragement, editorial skill and efficiency.
CHAPTER ONE
How Do We Know Who Jesus Is?
The question of Jesus identity is central to us as Christians. Because Christianity is an incarnational faithcentered on Jesus, the Word of God who became flesh and dwelt among usit is important to learn as much as we can about the Jesus of history. He lived in the land of Israel during what we now call the first century. The question of his identity still has great relevance for us in the early twenty-first century. Just consider the recent media attention received by Mel Gibsons film The Passion of the Christ and Dan Browns novel The Da Vinci Code.
When Jesus asked his disciples, Who do people say that I am? he got several different answers: John the Baptist, Elijah, one of the prophets. Even when Peter identified Jesus correctly as the Messiah, Jesus felt the need to redefine messiahship in terms of his coming passion, death and resurrection.
A Difficult Question
Although important, the question about Jesus identity is difficult to answer. It is hard to know the whole story about any person, even someone who has lived in our own time, let alone someone who lived two thousand years ago.
The major sources about Jesusthe Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and Johnwere written in light of the authors convictions about Jesus resurrection and continued existence with the one whom he called Father. The claims that these authors made about Jesus (such as Jesus is Lord) go beyond what is said about even the greatest human heroes.
My goal in this book is to state what, in my judgment, current New Testament scholarship allows us to say with confidence about Jesus as a historical figure. I want to tell the honest truth about what we can know about Jesus of Nazareth and thus provide a reasonably objective account against which the claims of Mel Gibson, Dan Brown and others can be measured.
Major Sources
The four Gospels are the major sources for what we know about Jesus. Nevertheless, they do not allow us to write a full biography about him. Rather, the evangelists were primarily interested in Jesus religious significance and his impact as a moral figure.
Marks Gospel, written around ad 70, perhaps in Rome, tells the story of Jesus public ministry in Galilee, his journey with his disciples to Jerusalem and his short ministry there as well as his passion, death and resurrection. Mark gave special attention to Jesus as the suffering Messiah and to the mystery of the cross.
Around ad 8590 Matthew and Luke seem to have independently produced their own revised and expanded versions of Marks Gospel. They added a large amount of teaching material from other sources and traditions. Matthew emphasized the Jewishness of Jesus and his fulfillment of Israels Scriptures, the books of the Bible Christians commonly call the Old Testament. Luke stressed Jesus significance not only for Israel but also for the other peoples of the world. Because the first three Gospels offer a common outline and vision of Jesus, they are often called the Synoptic Gospels, meaning viewed with one eye or lens or offering a common vision.