• Complain

Arthur M. Melzer - Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing

Here you can read online Arthur M. Melzer - Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: University Of Chicago Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Arthur M. Melzer Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing
  • Book:
    Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University Of Chicago Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Philosophical esotericismthe practice of communicating ones unorthodox thoughts between the lineswas a common practice until the end of the eighteenth century. The famous Encyclopdie of Diderot, for instance, not only discusses this practice in over twenty different articles, but admits to employing it itself. The history of Western thought contains hundreds of such statements by major philosophers testifying to the use of esoteric writing in their own work or others. Despite this long and well-documented history, however, esotericism is often dismissed today as a rare occurrence. But by ignoring esotericism, we risk cutting ourselves off from a full understanding of Western philosophical thought.
Arthur M. Melzer serves as our deeply knowledgeable guide in this capacious and engaging history of philosophical esotericism. Walking readers through both an ancient (Plato) and a modern (Machiavelli) esoteric work, he explains what esotericism isand is not. It relies not on secret codes, but simply on a more intensive use of familiar rhetorical techniques like metaphor, irony, and insinuation. Melzer explores the various motives that led thinkers in different times and places to engage in this strange practice, while also exploring the motives that lead more recent thinkers not only to dislike and avoid this practice but to deny its very existence. In the books final section, A Beginners Guide to Esoteric Reading, Melzer turns to how we might once again cultivate the long-forgotten art of reading esoteric works.
Philosophy Between the Lines is the first comprehensive, book-length study of the history and theoretical basis of philosophical esotericism, and it provides a crucial guide to how many major writingsphilosophical, but also theological, political, and literarywere composed prior to the nineteenth century.

Arthur M. Melzer: author's other books


Who wrote Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

ARTHUR M. MELZER is professor of political science at Michigan State University, where he is also cofounder and codirector of the Symposium on Science, Reason, and Modern Democracy. He is the author of The Natural Goodness of Man.

The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637

The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London

2014 by The University of Chicago

All rights reserved. Published 2014.

Printed in the United States of America

23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 1 2 3 4 5

ISBN-13: 978-0-226-17509-6 (cloth)

ISBN-13: 978-0-226-17512-6 (e-book)

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226175126.001.0001

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Melzer, Arthur M., author.

Philosophy between the lines : the lost history of esoteric writing / Arthur M. Melzer.

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-0-226-17509-6 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-226-17512-6 (e-book)

1. Philosophical literatureHistory and criticism. 2. Methodology. 3. Hermeneutics. 4. Censorship. 5. Secrecy. I. Title.

B52.66.M45 2014

190dc23

2014016966

Picture 1 This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).

PHILOSOPHY Between THE LINES

The Lost History of Esoteric Writing

ARTHUR M. MELZER

University of Chicago Press
Chicago & London

For
Shikha and Prateik

There is not a truth existing which I fear... or would wish unknown to the whole world.

THOMAS JEFFERSON

Must one be senseless among the senseless? No; but one must be wise in secret.

DIDEROT

PREFACE

EXOTERIC and ESOTERIC, adj. (History of Philosophy): The first of these words signifies exterior, the second, interior. The ancient philosophers had a double doctrine; the one external, public or exoteric; the other internal, secret or esoteric.

Encyclopedia of Diderot

... the distinction between the two doctrines so eagerly received by all the Philosophers, and by which they professed in secret sentiments contrary to those they taught publicly.

JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU

We moderns are believers in progress. But as even we must admit, the passage of time brings not only intellectual advance but also declinediscovery but also ossification, denial, and forgetting. There is a natural tendency, however, to notice and be impressed with the former, to neglect the latter. Discoveries stand out, while forgettings are invisible.

Countless books have been written celebrating the discovery of some important phenomenon. The present work examines the forgetting of one.

A LOST METHOD OF WRITINGAND READING

In a letter to a friend, dated October 20, 1811, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe speaks of an act of forgetting taking place before his eyes: I have always considered it an evil, indeed a disaster which, in the second half of the previous century, gained more and more ground that one no longer drew a distinction between the exoteric and the esoteric. The intellectual life of the West, Goethe reports here, has gradually been undergoing a strange and unfortunate transformation. Through a slow act of collective amnesia, a well-known phenomenon has quietly been dropping out of awareness: the philosophic practice of esoteric writing. By this is meant the practice of communicating ones unorthodox thoughts primarily between the lines, hidden behind a veneer of conventional pieties, for fear of persecution or for other reasons.

Although unheeded, Goethes warning turned out to be remarkably prescient, pointing to a philosophical forgetting that would continue to spread and deepen for another hundred years. For during the first half of the eighteenth century, esoteric writing was still very well known, openly discussed, and almost universally practiced (as it had been since ancient times), as can be seen from the epigraphs. These two statements could be multiplied a hundred timesand will be. And yet this well-established phenomenon was somehow slowly forgotten in the course of the nineteenth century and, in the twentieth, confidently declared a myth.

It was rediscovered principally by Leo Straussthe University of Chicago political philosopherwho began publishing on the subject in the late 1930s. As Alexandre Kojve declared in recognition of this achievement: Leo Strauss has reminded us of what has tended to be too easily forgotten since the nineteenth centurythat one ought not to take literally everything that the great authors of earlier times wrote, nor to believe that they made explicit in their writings all that they wanted to say in them. Still, Strausss efforts at recovery also went largely unheeded.

The present study is an exercise in historical recollection and retrieval. It attempts to more clearly display, document, and, above allif possiblereverse this extraordinary act of forgetting. It aims to reestablish a general recognition of the several reasons for and the near-universal prevalence of esoteric writing among the major philosophical writers of the West prior to the nineteenth century. My goal here is not to get people to like esotericism (I am no great lover of it myself), or to engage in it themselves (as I do not), but simply to recognize, understand, and accept it as a historical realityindeed a monumental one affecting the whole conduct of intellectual life in the West over two millennia. I seek a restoration not of esoteric writing but of esoteric readingthe recovery of a crucial but long-lost element of philosophical literacy.

What I also do not attempt to do is determine the particular esoteric teaching of everyone (or anyone) in this long line of thinkerssomething that cannot be done in a general work of this kind, but only with meticulous care, one philosopher at a time. My book is not: The Esoteric Secrets of All Ages Revealed! It is simply, if you like: Awareness of the Forgotten Practice of Esoteric Writing Restored. That is project enough.

WHAT IS AT STAKE

Naturally, the reader, who has yet to be shown much evidence for the reality of this strange practice, will want to reserve judgment on the merits of the project. Still, the great importance of the issue itself should at least be clear. Here is what is at stake.

If it turns out to be true that most philosophers of the past routinely hid some of their most important ideas beneath a surface of conventional opinions, then surely we had better know that. If they wrote esoterically and we do not read them esoterically, we will necessarily misunderstand them. We will systematically cut ourselves off from their thought precisely in its most unorthodox, original, and liberating part.

But the damage, great as it is, does not stop there. Not only will we misunderstand all these thinkers as individuals, but through the accumulation of such errors, we will also form mistaken ideas about the relations among thinkers, about how ideas develop over time, about the whole movement and meaning of Western intellectual history. This misunderstanding would be especially damaging to modern philosophy, which tends to rest, implicitly or explicitly, on a theory of history, an interpretation of the stages and trajectory of philosophical thought.

But the damage may, in fact, extend yet one crucial step further. If, for these reasons, we misunderstand earlier philosophers and, because of that, the history of philosophical thought, dont we also run a great risk of finally misunderstanding the character of human reason as suchespecially how it relates to the political and cultural environment in which it is embedded? For we can know how the faculty of reason works and what it is capable of primarily by seeing what it has doneby its history, its concrete record of failures and achievements. Thus, to systematically misconstrue the history of reason puts one in great danger of misunderstanding reason itself.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing»

Look at similar books to Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing»

Discussion, reviews of the book Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.