• Complain

Nuno Gil - Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability

Here you can read online Nuno Gil - Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Project Management Institute, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Nuno Gil Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability
  • Book:
    Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Project Management Institute
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

How do project teams overcome differences to adopt a design plan that strikes a balance between short-term affordability and long-term adaptability? In the book, Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability, Guilherme Biesek and Nuno Gil cite research indicating the need for a formal framework to develop front-end strategies that ensure cost-effective management of the project through future change.

Nuno Gil: author's other books


Who wrote Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Acknowledgements

T his manuscript consolidates research carried on between September 2009 and December 2012 as part of the doctoral studies of Guilherme Biesek at the Manchester Business School (MBS) under the supervision of Professor Nuno Gil. This research was sponsored by a 2 1\2-year external research grant awarded by the Project Management Institute in 2009 (recipient Nuno Gil) and a 3-year MBS PhD bursary (recipient Guilherme Biesek). Its industrial sponsor was Network Rail, the private company but limited by a public guarantee that owns and operates Britain's railway infrastructure.

APPENDIX A
Interview protocol

Core research questions for one-on-one interviews

I. Introduction: Professional activities in the company/organization

1. Job role?

2. Company vision and interests

3. Company background

4. Knowledge about railways projects

5. Capital projects involved?

6. Participation in meetings with NR

II. Background Exploration: Understanding and involvement of the project

7. Importance of the project to the company

8. Financial contribution to the project

9. Similar project executed previously

10. Interdependence with other projects

11. Bargain power

III. On specific projects

12. Characterize uncertainty in project requirements

13. Characterize flexibility in design architecture

14. Characterize project delivery and operational lifecycle timescales

15. Characterize options built into design definition

IV. Focused Exploration: Requirements

16. Importance of future requirements

17. Does the project design cope with future requirements?

18. How are future requirements negotiated?

19. Who pays for those requirements?

APPENDIX B
Questionnaire to Assess Overall Satisfaction with the Front-end Strategizing Process

In the next set of questions you are presented with a number of statements. Please indicate your level of agreement with each statement (1 = strongly agree, 7 = strongly disagree).

System Usefulness

01 - Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it was to front-end strategize the project.

02 - It was simple to do the project front-end strategizing.

03 - I could effectively complete the project front-end strategizing.

04 - I was able to complete the tasks and scenarios quickly.

05 - I was able to efficiently complete the tasks and scenarios.

06 - I felt comfortable with the project front-end strategizing process.

07 - It was easy to learn how to project front-end strategize.

08 - I believe I could NOT become more productive in project front-end strategizing.

Information Quality

09 - The information received as part of the institutional support clearly helped us to fix problems.

10 - Whenever there were disagreements among participants, the information received helped to overcome them easily and quickly.

11 - The information received as part of the institutional support was adequate.

12 - It was easy to leverage the information received as part of the institutional support.

13 - The information received as part of the institutional support was easy to understand.

14 - The information received as part of the institutional support was effective in helping us complete the tasks and scenarios.

15 - The institutional support was well structured.

Interface Quality

16 - The institutional support was easy to access.

17 - I liked undertaking this project front-end strategizing with the level of institutional support that was provided.

18 - The institutional support provided had all the qualities that I expect it to have.

19 - Overall, I am satisfied with the institutional support that was provided.

Please add any other comments you may have regarding this exercise

APPENDIX C
Instructor's Guide

The front-end strategizing exercise consists of a lab-based simulation of the fuzzy front-end strategizing process for a real-world project, the redevelopment of Network Rail (NR)'s Salford Crescent Railway Station. The exercise is designed to be undertaken with graduate-standing students enrolled in engineering and management programs. Its aim is to make students aware of the multistakeholder nature of the front-end strategizing process for a new infrastructure development (capital) project. The exercise creates an opportunity for students to experience a major challenge invariably facing multistakeholder teams at the project onset: reach a multilateral agreement on a design concept that can cope with foreseeable evolution in design requirements over the project and operating life. This requires the stakeholders to collectively balance affordability constraints with capital investments needed to future-proof the asset (i.e., investments to design in provisions to build flexibility in the asset definition). Getting this balance right is not straightforward for a number of reasons. First, stakeholders have different priorities, capabilities, and planning horizons; second, front-end strategizing talks are inexorably intertwined with negotiations on how to distribute the costs of the capital investments; and third, some stakeholders may not be in a position to contribute to fund a concept that meets their needs, but they may nonetheless find themselves legitimately entitled to make particular demands.

To play the exercise, the instructor needs to assemble teams of six participants, each one randomly assigned to play the role of a different stakeholder (see roles in , should not take students more than 5 minutes.

RoleMain Objectives for Project Front-End StrategizingAncillary Information
NR Project Manager
  1. Deliver the project on time and within the budget;
  2. Ensure concept meets the DfT High Level Output Specification
  3. Ensure concept fits with the National Stations Improvement Program (NISP) policy
NR Route Utilization Strategy for the North West
NR Project Engineer
  1. Ensure concept meets the technical standards and regulations
  2. Ensure concept enables to deliver to budget and within the timescale
NR Route Utilization Strategy for the North West
NR Commercial SponsorEnsure concept meets the external stakeholders interests, particularly those of the franchised station operator without compromising the NR commercial interestsNR Route Utilization Strategy for the North West
University
  1. Ensure the concept is aligned with the university's master plan
  2. Ensure the concept guarantees ease of access to the campus
  3. Ensure the concept encourages people to commute sustainably
University campus master plan
Regeneration AgencyEnsure the concept produces an aesthetically pleasant station building (landmark building) to support the local socio-economic developmentVision and Regeneration Local Framework
Station OperatorEnsure that the concept guarantees short-term revenue protection, while improving the reliability and friendliness of the train services and stationStation operator response to the NR Route Utilization Strategy for the North West
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability»

Look at similar books to Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability»

Discussion, reviews of the book Building Options at Project Front-End Strategizing: The Power of Capital Design for Evolvability and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.