• Complain

David Baggett - Hitchcock and Philosophy

Here you can read online David Baggett - Hitchcock and Philosophy full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Open Court, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Hitchcock and Philosophy
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Open Court
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Hitchcock and Philosophy: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Hitchcock and Philosophy" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The shower scene in Psycho; Cary Grant running for his life through a cornfield; innocent birds lined up on a fence waiting, watching these seminal cinematic moments are as real to moviegoers as their own lives. But what makes them so? What deeper forces are at work in Hitchcocks films that so captivate his fans? This collection of articles in the series thats explored such pop-culture phenomena as Seinfeld and The Simpsons examines those forces with fresh eyes. These essays demonstrate a fascinating range of topics: Sabotages lessons about the morality of terrorism and counter-terrorism; Ropes debatable Nietzschean underpinnings; Strangers on a Trains definition of morality. Some of the essays look at more overarching questions, such as why Hitchcock relies so heavily on the Freudian unconscious. In all, the book features 18 philosophers paying a special homage to the legendary auteur in...

David Baggett: author's other books


Who wrote Hitchcock and Philosophy? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Hitchcock and Philosophy — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Hitchcock and Philosophy" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents Popular Culture and Philosophy Series Editor George A - photo 1
Table of Contents Popular Culture and Philosophy Series Editor George A - photo 2
Table of Contents

Popular Culture and Philosophy
Series Editor: George A. Reisch
(Series Editor for this volume was William Irwin)
VOLUME 1
Seinfeld and Philosophy: A Book about Everything and Nothing (2000)
Edited by William Irwin
VOLUME 2
The Simpsons and Philosophy: The Doh! of Homer (2001) Edited by William Irwin, Mark T. Conard, and Aeon J. Skoble
VOLUME 3
The Matrix and Philosophy: Welcome to the Desert of the Real (2002) Edited by William Irwin
VOLUME 4
Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale (2003) Edited by James B. South
VOLUME 5
The Lord of the Rings and Philosophy: One Book to Rule Them All (2003) Edited by Gregory Bassham and Eric Bronson
VOLUME 6
Baseball and Philosophy: Thinking Outside the Batters Box (2004) Edited by Eric Bronson
VOLUME 7
The Sopranos and Philosophy: I Kill Therefore I Am (2004) Edited by Richard Greene and Peter Vernezze
VOLUME 8
Woody Allen and Philosophy: You Mean My Whole Fallacy Is Wrong? (2004) Edited by Mark T. Conard and Aeon J. Skoble
VOLUME 9
Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts (2004) Edited by David Baggett and Shawn E. Klein
VOLUME 10
Mel Gibsons Passion and Philosophy: The Cross, the Questions, the Controversy (2004) Edited by Jorge J.E. Gracia
VOLUME 11
More Matrix and Philosophy: Revolutions and Reloaded Decoded (2005) Edited by William Irwin
VOLUME 12
Star Wars and Philosophy: More Powerful than You Can Possibly Imagine (2005) Edited by Jason T. Eberl and Kevin S. Decker
VOLUME 13
Superheroes and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way (2005) Edited by Tom Morris and Matt Morris
VOLUME 14
The Atkins Diet and Philosophy: Chewing the Fat with Kant and Nietzsche (2005) Edited by Lisa Heldke, Kerri Mommer, and Cynthia Pineo
VOLUME 15
The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy: The Lion, the Witch, and the Worldview (2005) Edited by Gregory Bassham and Jerry L. Walls
VOLUME 16
Hip Hop and Philosophy: Rhyme 2 Reason (2005) Edited by Derrick Darby and Tommie Shelby
VOLUME 17
Bob Dylan and Philosophy: Its Alright Ma (Im Only Thinking) (2006) Edited by Peter Vernezze and Carl J. Porter
VOLUME 18
Harley-Davidson and Philosophy:
Full-Throttle Aristotle (2006) Edited by Bernard E. Rollin, Carolyn M. Gray, Kerri Mommer, and Cynthia Pineo
VOLUME 19
Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think! (2006) Edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A Reisch
VOLUME 20
Poker and Philosophy: Pocket Rockets and Philosopher Kings (2006) Edited by Eric Bronson
VOLUME 21
U2 and Philosophy: How to Decipher an Atomic Band (2006) Edited by Mark A. Wrathall
VOLUME 22
The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless (2006) Edited by Richard Greene and K. Silem Mohammad
VOLUME 23
James Bond and Philosophy: Questions Are Forever (2006) Edited by James B. South and Jacob M. Held
VOLUME 24
Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time (2006) Edited by Gary L. Hardcastle and George A. Reisch
VOLUME 25
The Beatles and Philosophy: Nothing You Can Think that Cant Be Thunk (2006) Edited by Michael Baur and Steven Baur
VOLUME 26
South Park and Philosophy: Bigger, Longer, and More Penetrating (2007) Edited by Richard Hanley
VOLUME 27
Hitchcock and Philosophy: Dial M for Metaphysics (2007) Edited by David Baggett and William A. Drumin

IN PREPARATION:
The Grateful Dead and Philosophy (2007) Edited by Steven Gimbel
Tarantino and Philosophy (2007) Edited by Richard Greene and K. Silem Mohammad
Pink Floyd and Philosophy (2007) Edited by George A. Reisch
Bruce Springsteen and Philosophy (2008) Edited by Randall E. Auxier and Doug Anderson
To Donald Spoto
Previews and Opening Credits
As we look at popular culture through the lens of philosophy, a familiar, portly figure ambles into viewthe master of suspense, Alfred Hitchcock.
Hitchcock was a profound artist as well as a popular entertainer. His numerous classic movies engage the viewer through the elaboration of ideas, concepts, and humanist issues, deployed via the medium of compelling cinematic language, of images and sounds.
Hitchcock has long been recognized as a cinematic auteur whose films embody expressions of a personal vision of the world. The chapters presented in this volume address a range of issues, some raised by consideration of a single film (including one segment done for Hitchcocks TV series), some by a comparison of two or more movies, and some by an examination of a significant facet of Hitchcocks entire work. We aim to critically examine Hitchcocks approach and to uncover some of its philosophical implications.
Many viewers have observed that Alfred Hitchcock focuses on ideas in the construction of his films. The French director-critics Claude Chabrol and Eric Roemer, in their book, Hitchcock, claimed that each of his classic films is based on a sort of formal postulate. Hitchcock organized the dramatic elements of the films around the expression and deployment of conceptual elements. Philosophical issues are thus proposed by the thematic motifs in Hitchcocks major films. Among conspicuous elements of Hitchcocks personal vision, we may discern the following:

1. A strong anti-utopian outlook that finds the human species, and indeed the universe itself, to be in a fallen condition with a disillusioning propensity for unleashing chaos and destruction.
2. A decidedly existentialist perspective that affirms the challenge of individual self-definition through the risk of personal choice and commitment.
3. A correlative construal of spectatorship as flight from commitment and authenticity, or an attempt to deny the primary reality of the subjective.
4. A remarkable anticipation of later viewpoints regarding the social roles of women.

This book explores the philosophical implications of these perspectives and other aspects of Hitchcocks artistic vision. The philosophical issues have their inherent interest and challenge and also deepen our appreciation of the movies.
Like the films it investigates, Hitchcock and Philosophy was made possible by a huge collaborative effort. Many thanks to all of our excellent authors. Their patience was Herculean and their philosophical talents and sincere regard for Hitchcock are obvious. The deepest thanks to our own masterful director and friend, the auteur Bill (T-Bone) Irwin, whose vision for this book and the popular series of which its a part guided all our efforts and whose influence can be felt on every page.
We appreciate all the good folks at Open Court for bringing the book to its final stage of completion, and special thanks go to Jaime McAndrew for offering some very useful editorial suggestions.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Hitchcock and Philosophy»

Look at similar books to Hitchcock and Philosophy. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Hitchcock and Philosophy»

Discussion, reviews of the book Hitchcock and Philosophy and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.