• Complain

Wesley M. Oliver - The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation

Here you can read online Wesley M. Oliver - The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: Vanderbilt University Press, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Vanderbilt University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Legal precedents created during Prohibition have lingered, leaving search-and-seizure law much better defined than limits on police use of force, interrogation practices, or eyewitness identification protocols. An unlawful trunk search is thus, guarded against more thoroughly than an unnecessary shooting or a wrongful conviction.
Intrusive searches for alcohol during Prohibition destroyed middle-class Americans faith in police and ushered in a new basis for controlling police conduct. State courts in the 1920s began to exclude perfectly reliable evidence obtained in an illegal search. Then, as Prohibition drew to a close, a presidential commission awakened the public to torture in interrogation rooms, prompting courts to exclude coerced confessions irrespective of whether the technique had produced a reliable statement.
Prohibitions scheme lingered long past the Roaring 20s. Racial tensions and police brutality were bigger concerns in the 1960s than illegal searches, yet when the Supreme Court imposed limits on officers conduct in 1961, searches alone were regulated. Interrogation law during the 1960s, fundamentally reshaped by the Miranda ruling, ensured that suspects who invoked their rights would not be subject to coercive tactics, but did nothing to ensure reliable confessions by those who were questioned. Explicitly recognizing that its decisions excluding evidence had not been well-received, the Court in the 1970s refused to exclude identifications merely because they were made in suggestive lineups. Perhaps a larger project awaits-refocusing our rules of criminal procedure on those concerns from, which Prohibition distracted us: conviction accuracy and the use of force by police.

Wesley M. Oliver: author's other books


Who wrote The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
THE PROHIBITION ERA AND POLICING THE PROHIBITION ERA AND POLICING A LEGACY OF - photo 1

THE PROHIBITION ERA AND POLICING

THE PROHIBITION ERA AND POLICING

A LEGACY OF MISREGULATION

WESLEY M. OLIVER

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY PRESS

NASHVILLE

2018 by Vanderbilt University Press

Nashville, Tennessee 37235

All rights reserved

First printing 2018

This book is printed on acid-free paper.

Manufactured in the United States of America

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data on file

LC control number 2017006646 (print) | 2017008298 (ebook)

LC classification number KF5399 .O45 2017

Dewey classification number 344.7305/209042dc23

LC record available at lccn.loc.gov/2017006646

ISBN 978-0-8265-2187-3 (hardcover)

ISBN 978-0-8265-2188-0 (paperback)

ISBN 978-0-8265-2189-7 (ebook)

TO WELFORD MACON DURRER, MY GRANDFATHER

CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This book is the culmination of well over a decade of research and thinking about questions of criminal procedure. I began practicing law in Nashville two decades ago and soon discovered that I was better suited for ruminating about the law than I was for the practice of it.

Shortly after I moved to Nashville, I had the good fortune of meeting Don Hall, a professor at Vanderbilt Law School, who gave me the standard advice offered to any aspiring academicpublish. Unlike others, though, he followed up and asked if I had given any thought to possible ideas for law review articles. Somewhere between my seventh and eighth idea, I could tell he had decided he would be my mentor. I am certain I would not be a law professor today had it not been for that meeting. Almost two decades later, and years after Dons premature passing, the Vanderbilt University Press expressed an interest in publishing this book. No one at the press at that point knew the role my time in practice in Nashville or the mentorship I received at Vanderbilt Law School had played in my career, or in this work in particular. Some of lifes apparent coincidences seem, if not providential, at least poetic.

Very early versions of the ideas in this book began to take shape as I tried to learn what it meant to be a criminal defense lawyer and how my skill sets best fit within that job. Excellent attorneysBo Edwards, Jim Simmons, Lionel Barrett, Rich McGee, Bill Massey, Lorna McCluskey, John Oliva, Glenn Funk, and Keith Stewart among themwere part of the very nurturing community of the criminal defense bar in Tennessee that helped me learn the craft that Ive spent most of my professional life commenting on.

I discovered I was better at winning suppression motions than jury trials and began to wonder whya query that led to this book. Perhaps my lawyering skills were better suited to the picayune doctrines of the Fourth Amendment than they were to convincing jurors of a particular version of the facts, but I concluded something very different. I came to believe that my track record revealed something about the criminal justice system. The system seemed to me more willing to give a defendant who seemed guilty a pass if the police illegally seized evidence against him than it did when there was some possibility of innocence.

Studying this irony took me back to graduate school and a fellowship, where I had the privilege of gaining the insights of scholars of criminal procedure, criminal law, constitutional law, and legal history, including Bruce Ackerman, Alan Dershowitz, Bob Gordon, Ken Mack, Carol Steiker, Kate Stith, and Bill Stuntz, each of whom broadened the way I was thinking about our method of regulating police.

Earlier versions of portions of this book that considered the time period from the mid-nineteenth century through Prohibition were published as articles in the Hamline Law Review, NYU Journal of Law and Liberty, Rutgers Law Review, Tennessee Law Review, and Tulane Law Review. Years after I began studying the history of police, I realized that the history I had examined had implications for the way we presently regulate, or misregulate, police. Articles in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Missouri Law Review, and DePaul Law Review previewed these ideas, which I more fully flesh out here.

Historical research requires librarians with intelligence and tenacity. This story could not have been told without the discoveries made by Naomi Ronen at Harvard Law School, Ed Sonnenberg at Widener Law School, and Tsegaye Beru at Duquesne Law School.

Large portions of this book were written at nontraditional locationsin a coffeehouse in New Haven, on a plane to Charleston, on multiple train trips between Boston and New Haven, and on a wharf in Portland, just to name a few. Portions were also written at a place where I have found inspiration and encouragement since I was a young childmy moms dining room tablea place for which I will always be grateful.

THE PROHIBITION ERA AND POLICING

INTRODUCTION

Our regulation of police is backward. Very detailed rules describe when officers may search the trunk of a car, yet only the vaguest of rules inform officers when they may use deadly force. Officers may question suspects only if they consent to interrogation, but interrogation methods that have been shown to produce false confessions are not forbidden. Science has demonstrated that eyewitness identifications of strangers are, under the best of circumstances, unreliable. Yet while the law will exclude perfectly reliable but unlawfully obtained evidence to prevent police from engaging in certain search and seizure tactics, our rules of criminal procedure will not forbid the admission of intentionally created suggestive lineups to ensure that these methods are not used in the future.

Current events reveal the problem with our misregulation of police. Too often the vague law that governs use of force by officers leaves us unable to know when police shootings are valid. Innocent men and women languish in our prisons because leading interrogation methods produced false confessions or suggestive lineups led witnesses to identify the wrong culprit. Meanwhile undeniably guilty suspects escape punishment because police officers obtained reliable physical evidence in a manner inconsistent with the Constitutionor failed to inform suspects of their rights before commencing an interrogation.

These should hardly seem like original observations. Complaints about legal rules that free the guilty are certainly not new. Immediately after the US Supreme Court announced its major decisions regulating officers in the 1960s, it was accused of handcuffing the police. These criticisms have continued unabated since then. Miranda v. Arizona is one of two Supreme Court decisions virtually every American knows, and most nonlawyers complain about. As recently as the last presidential election, candidates were appalled at the idea that terror suspects might be given Miranda warnings. Limits on the ability of officers to seize physical evidence have been the subject of similar criticism. Benjamin Cardozo, later a justice on the US Supreme Court, complained in

Likewise, problems of excessive police force and wrongful convictions have not escaped the publics notice. With advances in DNA technology, courts, policy makers, and members of society generally have come to realize that wrongful convictions occur. Since 1973, 155 men and one woman who had been condemned to death have been exonerated. In recent years, however, state killings on the street have attracted even more attention and produced considerable social unrest. The deaths of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Freddie Gray, and others have prompted protests well beyond the cities in which these people died as a result of questionable uses of police force.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation»

Look at similar books to The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Prohibition Era and Policing: A Legacy of Misregulation and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.