• Complain

Matthew Kauth - Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas

Here you can read online Matthew Kauth - Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Saint Benedict Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Saint Benedict Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The purpose of this work is to explore and explain St Thomas curious description of charity as a kind of friendship of man for God.This is achieved in two symphonic movements:1) An investigation into the metaphysical substructure of friendship;2) Analysis of St Thomas commentary on St Johns Gospel from which he takes his understanding of charity as friendship.In the first part, basic concepts are defined which are employed ubiquitously by the Angelic Doctor whenever he discusses love and friendship. Once a basic lexicon is built, the author distinguishes diverse kinds of love given the anthropology of St Thomas. This in term is employed in the specific love of friendship noting also Thomas dependence upon the Philosopher, Aristotle. Finally, charity itself is examined based primarily upon Thomas treatment in the Secunda secundae of the Summa Theologiae.The second movement of the work engages the text of Thomas commentary. Aquinas sees the Incarnation as the archetype of all transformation in Christ, namely, that Christ establishes with man a common life upon which friendship is based. This common life must move from the sensible to the spiritual, from human life to Divine. This course is tracked by the author with special emphasis on the means employed by Christ now with His would-be friends, namely, the gift of His Spirit and the Sacrament of Charity.About the Author:Fr. Matthew Kauth is a priest for the Diocese of Charlotte North Carolina, ordained in the Year of our Lord 2000. Fr. Kauth did his undergraduate work in philosophy at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary and his graduate work in theology at the Catholic University of America. After serving as both parochial vicar and subsequently pastor, Fr. Kauth earned a license and doctorate in Moral Theology from the University of the Holy Cross in Rome. He currently teaches diverse courses at Belmont Abbey College in addition to his other pastoral responsibilities at St. Thomas Aquinas Church in Charlotte, NC.

Matthew Kauth: author's other books


Who wrote Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Vidimus et adprobavimus ad normam statutorum Prof Dr Stephen Brock Prof Dr - photo 1

Vidimus et adprobavimus ad normam statutorum

Prof. Dr. Stephen Brock

Prof. Dr. Robert Wielockx

Imprimi potest

Prof. Dr. ngel Rodrguez Luo

Decano della Facolt di Teologia

Dr. Manuel Miedes

Segretario Generale

Roma, 25 January 2013

Prot. n 13/2013

Imprimatur

Con approvazione ecclesiastica

His Excellency Peter J. Jugis, JCD

Bishop of the Diocese of Charlotte, North Carolina

Charlotte, 22nd February 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION ONE
THE METAPHYSICAL SUBSTRUCTURE OF FRIENDSHIP

SECTION TWO
INCARNATE FRIENDSHIP AND DIVINE FRIENDSHIP

ABBREVIATIONS

The Summa theologiae is cited without title, beginning with the pars (e.g. I, II). Other words of Aquinas are cited with the following abbreviations in the order in which they appear in the thesis:

Ex Post. Analyt.: Expositio libri Posteriorum Analyticorum

Compend.: Compendium theologiae

Super Ioan.: Super Evangelium S. Ioannis lectura

De Ver.: Quaestiones disputatae de veritate

De Car.: Quaestiones disputatae de caritate

Sent.: Scriptum super Sententiis

Super Matt.: Super Evangelium S. Matthaei lectura

Meta.: Sententia libri Metaphysicae

ScG: Summa contra Gentiles

De Malo: Quaestiones disputatae de malo

De Pot.: Quaestiones disputatae de potentia

De princ.: nat. De principiis naturae

In Physic.: In libros Physicorum

De spirit. creat.: Quaestio disputata de spiritualibus creaturis

De virt.: Quaestiones disputatae de virtutibus

De sub. crea.: De substantiis separatis

De hebdom. Expositio libri Boetii De hebdomadibus

De div.: nom. In librum B. Dionysii De divinis nominibus

Sent.: Ethic. Sententia libri Ethicorum

Sent. Polit.: Sententia libri Politicorum

De Anima: Quaestio disputata de anima

Super Heb.: Super Epistolam ad Hebraeos

Super Rom.: Super Epistolam ad Romanos lectura

Super Is.: Expositio super Isaiam ad litteram

Super Eph.: Super Epistolam ad Ephesios lectura

Super Phil.: Super Epistolam ad Philipenses lectura

Super Gal.: Super Epistolam ad Galatas lectura

Super I Cor.: Super I Epistolam ad Corinthios lectura

Super II Cor.: Super II Epistolam ad Corinthios lectura

Catena in Mt.: Catena aurea in quatuor Evangelia

Catena in Lc.: Catena aurea in quatuor Evangelia

Abbreviations for the works of Aristotle

NE: Nichomachean Ethics

Metaph.: Metaphysics

I have taken the liberty of placing the majority of the texts of Thomas in the footnotes for the convenience of the reader.

INTRODUCTION

I. The Thesis

Moral theology is a part of sacra doctrina which scientifically studies the causes of mans eternal beatitude. Whereas ethics more precisely examines human action, moral theology has God as its formal object and universal cause and man as ordered to the attainment of God as end. Nevertheless, human action also falls under the province of moral theology for man is himself a caused cause, who, in virtue of his rational nature has dominion over himself making his acts his acts and thus ethically adjudicable. Among the various causes through which God brings man to the attainment of this end (e.g., law, grace, gifts etc.), the causes of the theological virtues are examined as actions that are genuinely mans but whose principal cause is God. St. Thomas Aquinas describes a virtue as the perfection of a power which disposes the agent toward right action. When an action is proportionate to mans capacity, such a virtue can be developed. When it is beyond mans nature, it must be given him. Charity is the theological virtue that perfects the will in its acts; thus it is a virtue which makes man himself good. For this reason, Thomas simply states that the perfection of the Christian life consists radically in charity.

But what is charity? Thomas defines charity simply as friendship. Given this assertion, many questions arise which are in need of answers. By what authority does Thomas identify charity as friendship with God? How can man be a friend of God given the infinite inequality between the friends? More fundamentally, what does it mean to be a friend? What is its definition and what are the perfected acts caused by the virtue of friendship? All of these questions and more will be discussed in this thesis, a thesis that has as its formal object an attempt to understand and explain Thomas simple statement: charity is a kind of friendship of man for God.

In order to properly examine Thomas assertion, other disciplines must come to the ready if true understanding is to be obtained. First, the moment one asks what something is , he has entered into the domain of metaphysics which studies being as being. Yet the relative abandonment of formal and final causality (metaphysical notions) in moral reasoning has led to the pejorative use of the term abstract. To say that something is abstract is now tantamount to saying that it is incomprehensible or without value. Ironically, used as a verb it refers to the very process by which man, properly as rational, grasps that which he knows in its being, free from its material concatenation. In moral reasoning, this abstraction is that which makes freedom possible, for it is the means by which we attain the ratio of a given thing and can thus understand it under its aspect of good. Hence, abstraction is that which properly allows for comprehension and value as objective goodness and as something subjectively chosen.

Nevertheless, moral theology is essentially a practical science, and one must make a return, as it were, to matter in acts. Charity demands such a return since it is essentially ecstatic, that is, it concerns itself with an act of the will toward another . The other, in this case, happens to be God and all acts ordered to that end for his sake. This end surpasses mans reason, and as such, despite the best metaphysical analysis, it remains insufficient to comprehend what is meant by friendship with God. It was fitting, therefore, that God himself reveal the essence of charity. This he has done most perfectly in his Son who, speaking to his disciples, called them out of his own charity friends and who, by his charity, made them so. To know what charity is in the writings of St. Thomas demands metaphysical precision, but as Aquinas knows, to understand charity in its intensity and relationality demands knowledge of the charity of Christ. As Thomas states, whatever occurred in the mystery of redemption and Christs Incarnation was a work of charity. Christ was born out of charity and for charity he died.

II. The Methodology

The thesis, as noted above, demands a metaphysical investigation as foundational to an analysis of revelation as given in the mystery of the Incarnation and Passion of the Son. As such, the thesis delineates the methodology, namely an analysis of the necessary metaphysical concepts which will be subsequently employed in Thomas exposition of these revealed mysteries in his commentary on Johns Gospel in which the pericope identifying charity and friendship is found (Jn. 15:13). What are those concepts?

Thomas did not write a treatise on friendship itself. In examining the relevant passages in which he defines friendship, one notes that certain notions are employed consistently and need to be defined. Similarly, since the thesis is about man s friendship for God, an adequate understanding of Thomas anthropology is in order. Finally, since charity is itself a virtue but also one of the names of love in rational creatures, love itself must be examined according to the mind of Thomas. These three steps, I contend, will grant the necessary substructure for analyzing charity as Divine-human friendship. The metaphysical fruit gathered in the above investigation will then be applied by looking at Thomas commentary on Johns Gospel, thus drawing together the often disparate disciplines of philosophy and theology. Friendship will be applied first in its more familiar notion, for Christ in his humanity has made himself a friend of man. This application will lead to friendships transformation through the humanity of Christ to its fulfillment in Divine friendship. Charity is the form of the virtues orchestrating them to their perfection and ultimate end. Similarly, Christ in his Incarnation draws to human friendship those he has chosen and through his humanity orchestrates the acts of his disciples toward the Passion and ultimately by means of his humanity leads them into Divine friendship.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas»

Look at similar books to Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas»

Discussion, reviews of the book Charity as Divine and Human Friendship: A Metaphysical and Scriptural Explanation According to the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.