• Complain

Bilveer Singh - Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood

Here you can read online Bilveer Singh - Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: London, year: 2008, publisher: Routledge, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Bilveer Singh Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood
  • Book:
    Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2008
  • City:
    London
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Papuan conflict has been on the international radar screen since Indonesia became an independent state in 1945. Since the surrender of the territory of Papua to Indonesia in 1962, a low-intensity military conflict has been building. Most Papuans believed that their right to self-determination was sacrificed on the altar of geopolitics. Later, when East Timor seceded peacefully from Indonesia, Papuans expected the same right. When this did not happen, the conflict intensified. In this pivotal work, Bilveer Singh examines the history of the Papuan struggle, and approaches to conflict resolution through the framework of its geopolitical implications. Asserting that the Papuans were treated unjustly by Indonesia and the international community, it is not surprising that many have come down squarely on the side of Papuan independence as a way out of the imbroglio.While to some extent the Papuans case cannot be denied, definite political and strategic realities should not be ignored. Unfortunately for the Papuans, their territory has immense geopolitical, geostrategic, and economic significance--not only for Indonesia, but also for others such as the United States, China, Australia, and a number of European countries. Papua is wealthy, under-populated and backward in terms of human resource development. Its future as a distinct entity is in real danger as the Papuans are becoming the minority in their own homeland. Due to the asymmetry of power, the Papuans struggle has not made a breakthrough that would force Indonesia to rethink the future of the territory in any fundamental way.In order to unravel the dynamics involving Papuan separatism, this study describes the Papuan political landscape. Singh explains what makes Papua unique, and how its makeup has affected the territorys political dynamics. He analyzes the emergence of Papua as a geopolitical trophy, calling into question the degree to which Papuan nationalism has crystallized. Finally, he questions whether Papua is emerging as a regional flashpoint, and, in view of its geopolitical importance, the various options available. Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood will be of interest to scholars of international relations, comparative politics of Indonesia and the Asia-Pacific, and policymaking.

Bilveer Singh: author's other books


Who wrote Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
PAPUA
PAPUA
GEOPOLITICS AND THE QUEST FOR NATIONHOOD
Bilveer Singh
First published 2008 by Transaction Publishers Published 2017 by Routledge 2 - photo 1
First published 2008 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2017 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 2008 by Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2007045405
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Singh, Bilveer, 1956
Papua : geopolitics and the quest for nationhood / Bilveer Singh.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4128-0705-0 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Nationalism--Papua New Guinea. 2. Geopolitics--Papua New Guinea.
3. Papua New Guinea--Politics and government. I. Title.
DU740.75.S58 2008
995.103--dc22
2007045405
ISBN 13: 978-1-4128-0705-0 (hbk)
To Gurdial Kaur my beloved wife who has been the pillar of strength and inspiration in my life without whom this study would not have been possible.
Contents
Appendix: West Irian migr Organizations
Supporting Papuan Independence
There has long been a struggle over Papua; between the colonial powers (British, Germans and the Dutch) in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, between the Dutch and Indonesians, from August 1945 to August 1962, and between Indonesia and Australia from 1950 to 1962. Yet, the single most important struggle over Papua since the territory was formally handed over to Indonesia has been the attempt by armed and unarmed separatists to pursue what has been described as a struggle for self-determination. A range of arguments and justifications have been put forth to claim that Papua, namely, the western half of the island of New Guinea (presently shared between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea), deserves to become a sovereign and independent state, if need be, along the lines of East Timor. If East Timor, once the twenty-seventh province of Indonesia, can achieve statehood, so should Papua, argue the separatists. Yet, for the time being, Papuan nationalism and its quest for self-determination, on the one hand, and Indonesian nationalism and geopolitical interests of the various stakeholders, on the other, seem to be in conflict. This has exacerbated the struggle in the territory, which has been described as the last of the major sources of instability in Indonesia following the peace deal over Aceh in 2005.
While there have been few cases of successful secession, as evident in East Timor and Bangladesh, more often than not, attempts by secessionists are met with ruthless repression by the state, especially the armed forces, who view themselves as the guardians of the modern state in most of the decolonized areas of Asia and Africa. While cases of successful secession are very few, there are litany of attempts to do so in South, Southwest and Southeast Asia that had ended in failure, and often at great cost to all parties concerned. While the West has championed self-determination causes in general, on the whole, states tend to be status quo-oriented with violations of territorial sovereignty and integrity regarded as taboos that should be avoided at all costs, even if it means condoning repression of would-be secessionists. India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia, the list of states guilty of such seems endless.
Ever since the Dutch refusal to surrender the then-West New Guinea to Indonesia in the late 1940s and the subsequent brinkmanship that culminated in Indonesias takeover of the territory a decade later, much has been written on the subject. The semantical description of the territory has also shifted from that of West New Guinea, West Papua, West Irian, Irian Jaya, Papua, West Irian Jaya, Central Irian Jaya, and Papua. Most writings on Papua have focused on the unjust manner by which the territory was transferred to Indonesia. Writers such as Robin Osborne, John Safford, Peter King, and Jim Elmslie have supported the claims of Papuan separatists, arguing that the West, especially the United States had betrayed the Papuans for its own geopolitical interests. Despite the United Nations endorsement, the transfer was illegal due to the manner by which the Act of Free Choice (the referendum deciding on Papuan self-determination) was administered. While such an argument has been debated and there is no doubt that there were problems with the manner Indonesia determined the self-determination process, it does not logically follow that Papua is not an integral part of Indonesia.
Many writings have also focused on the manner Indonesia has ruled the province since May 1963, when it took over the territory from the United Nations Temporary Executive Administration (UNTEA) and more specifically since 1969, following the Act of Free Choice. The main criticisms have been of the ways Papua has been transformed into an internal colony where the indigenous culture and traditions are undermined, the people impoverished, the territorys rich resources voraciously exploited, the environment degraded, and the people politically repressed and marginalized. Transmigration is making the Papuans a minority in their own homeland and, worst of all, human rights abuses and violations are extensively perpetrated by the security apparatus. There is much truth in these allegations as evident from the murder of many Papuan leaders such as Arnold Ap, Tom Wanggai and Theys Eluay. More than 100,000 other Papuans are also alleged to have been killed under Indonesian rule.
Granted that Papua has tremendous geopolitical and geoeconomic significance and that there are many problems associated with the territory, what has been somewhat neglected has been the security dimension of the unsettled conflict. It is interesting to note that what initially placed Papua on the world map was not its riches, but its security and strategic significance. Whereas the Dutch had fought hard to hold on to Papua for political, nostalgic, and psychological reasons, the Indonesians were prepared to go to war, mainly for defense and security reasons, as they believed in the territorial integrity of their state that was previously under Dutch colonialism. From the late 1940s to early 1960s, the Australians also supported the Dutch position to deny Papua to Indonesia on security grounds. Canberra hoped to create a security corridor between an unstable and dangerous Indonesia and itself through the buffer of Papua as well as to avoid sharing a land border with Indonesia in its colony, Papua New Guinea. Later, the Americans pressured the Dutch and brought the British and the Australians into line to support Washingtons position to back Indonesias ownership of Papua, again principally on grounds of security, to prevent Indonesia from joining the Soviet camp and to deny Moscow a beachhead in Indonesia in the midst of the Cold War. Since then, the Western world, Southeast Asian countries, and even outwardly, Australia, have supported Indonesias hold of Papua, mainly due to security considerationsa Balkanized Indonesia will be worse for everyones interests. Thus, the security factor has been uppermost in the calculus of most players as far as Papua is concerned and this dimension has almost single-handedly determined Papuas fate thus far. Undoubtedly, the security dimension will similarly influence its future.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood»

Look at similar books to Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood»

Discussion, reviews of the book Papua: Geopolitics and the Quest for Nationhood and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.