• Complain

William Marvel - Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862

Here you can read online William Marvel - Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2008, publisher: HMH, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    HMH
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2008
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A portrait of a pivotal chapter in the Civil War, featuring scheming politicians, bumbling generals, and an increasingly disheartened Northern public (Brooks Simpson, author of Ulysses S. Grant: Triumph Over Adversity, 18221865).
In Mr. Lincoln Goes to War, award-winning historian William Marvel focused on President Abraham Lincolns first year in office. In Lincolns Darkest Year, he paints a picture of 1862again relying on recently unearthed primary sources and little-known accounts to offer newfound detail of this tumultuous period.
Marvel highlights not just the actions but also the deeper motivations of major figures, including Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, Jefferson Davis, George B. McClellan, Stonewall Jackson, and, most notably, Lincoln himself. As the action darts from the White House to the battlefields and back, the author sheds new light on the hardships endured by everyday citizens and the substantial and sustained public opposition to the war.
Combining fluid prose and scholarship with the skills of an investigative historical detective, Marvel unearths the true story of our nations greatest crisis.

William Marvel: author's other books


Who wrote Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents

Copyright 2008 by William Marvel
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, write to Permissions, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 215 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10003.
www.hmhco.com
The Library of Congress has cataloged the print edition as follows:
Marvel, William.
Lincolns darkest year : the war in 1862 / William Marvel.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-618-85869-9
1. United StatesHistoryCivil War, 18611865Campaigns. 2. Lincoln, Abraham, 18091865Military leadership. 3. United StatesPolitics and government18611865Decision making. I. Title.
E471.M368 2008
973.7dc22 2007038416
e ISBN 978-0-547-52386-6
v3.0518
For Ellen,
fortissimo e appassionato
List of Illustrations and Maps
All illustrations are courtesy of the Library of Congress.
BEGINNNING PAGE
Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton greeting his generals
Searching for the wounded after Fort Donelson
Major General Don Carlos Buell
Major General Nathaniel P. Banks
Union remains on the battlefield of Gainess Mill
Field hospital at Savages Station
The retreat from Savages Station
Major General John Pope
Major General Henry W. Halleck
Lincoln and his cabinet
Old Capitol Prison
Union rally in Washington, August 6, 1862
Longstreet surprising Pope at Second Bull Run
Refugees from Sioux uprising in Minnesota
General Braxton Bragg
Lieutenant General Edmund Kirby Smith
BEGINNNING PAGE
Candidates for the Exempt Brigade
Scene, Fifth Avenue
Union troops marching through Middletown, Maryland
Sharpsburgs main street in 1862
Confederate dead in Bloody Lane
Burnsides Bridge
Dead white horse near the edge of the East Woods
Lincoln visiting McClellan in the field
Union troops monitoring the election in Baltimore
McClellans farewell to the army
Ambrose Burnside with his generals
Union troops amid looted property in Fredericksburg
Major General Joseph Hooker
Humphreyss attack on Maryes Heights
Cavalry escorting deserters back to camp
Native Guards on duty in Louisiana
MAPS
All maps by Catherine Schneider
Western Theater ()
Eastern Theater ()
The Seven Days ()
Second Bull Run ()
Antietam ()
Fredericksburg ()
Preface
This is the common story of a war growing completely out of hand and overwhelming the people who started it. As always, opposing factions argued for either peace or continued prosecution, with one group judging the price too great for any potential results and the other reluctant to waste the investment already made. Tragically, victory and peace might have satisfied both parties fairly early, but those opportunities were lost through a closely connected series of blunders, some of which can be traced back to the conscious decisions of Abraham Lincoln. Those executive decisions appear to have been influenced by pressure from Radical Republicans, and in some cases the unfortunate choices contradicted Lincolns own instincts.
The second half of 1861 had seemed laden with Confederate victories over the Union invaders, but 1862 began with a nearly unbroken string of Union triumphs. Most confrontations in the western theater that winter and spring ended in abject Southern defeat, and occasionally in complete surrender. By the end of April, New Mexico had been rid of Southern intruders; New Orleans had fallen; the Southern legions that had defended Kentucky and Tennessee had been driven into the tier of Gulf States, or conducted north as prisoners. The Atlantic coast bristled with Union bases. In May, Federals swarmed into Baton Rougethe second Confederate state capital captured within two monthsand in northern Mississippi a massive Union army closed in on its main opponent, under General Pierre G. T. Beauregard. In Virginia, despite much-criticized delay, George McClellans Army of the Potomac lay at Richmonds eastern approaches with a hundred thousand Union soldiers, and forty thousand more stood at Fredericksburg, ready to swoop down on Richmond from the north and west. The Confederate capital could muster barely half as many defenders as the combined Yankee host, and things looked very gloomy for the new nation of slave states.
Then, in a matter of days, it all fell apart. Beginning on May 23, Stonewall Jackson descended on outnumbered Union defenders in the Shenandoah Valley and sent them flying to the far side of the Potomac River. Abraham Lincoln bore primary responsibility for depleting his Valley divisions and appointing incompetent politicians to command them, and at their flight he fell into a panic, scattering his Fredericksburg troops into the Valley in a needless effort to repel Jacksonand in a vain attempt to capture him. That emasculated the overpowering dual movement against Richmond, where on May 31 Confederates pounced on an isolated wing of the Army of the Potomac and delivered an embarrassing, if uncoordinated, blow. Beauregard slipped his army out of beleaguered Corinth, Mississippi, causing weeks of apprehension that he had reinforced Richmond, and that apprehension posed a serious liability for Union arms at the end of June. Believing himself vastly outnumbered by the Confederates who assailed him so ferociously, McClellan retreated from Richmonds door in a weeklong running fight that left his grand army gasping on the banks of the James River, a good twenty-five miles downstream from the chambers of the Confederate Congress.
In forty days the Union juggernaut appeared to have been halted. The battlefield reverses had all come in Virginia, which carried limited strategic importance in the quest to subdue the South, but the Virginia theater encompassed political symbols that far outweighed its military significance. The embattled hundred miles between Washington and Richmond therefore attracted a disproportionate measure of public attention, and that obsession with events in Virginia cost the Union cause dearly in 1862. The repulse of McClellans promising advance initiated a wave of dejection among the civilian population. The rise of the audacious John Pope, and his bloody disasters at the head of the Army of Virginia that August, had the same depressing effect on Union soldiers. In conjunction with the administrations decision to withdraw McClellan from the James and give most of his army to Pope, Popes failures also brought the war back to the outskirts of Washington, and then into the loyal states.
The restoration of McClellan to field command in September put much heart back in the army. McClellan brought a more deliberate and methodical approach to warfare, which naturally appealed to the men who would have to do the fighting, but McClellans soldiers may have admired him equally for his conservative politics: he advocated reunion uncontaminated by any abolitionist agenda, and that seemed to reflect the opinion of most Union troops in the summer of 1862. His success in repelling the Confederates from Maryland does not, however, seem to have restored Northern confidence so abruptly or so completely as retrospective accounts might suggestas much as it may have dismayed Southern civilians. Their momentary sense of relief aside, many Northern observers gauged the Southern incursions into Maryland and Kentucky that September less as failed invasions than as successful raids that might be repeated any time. It was primarily those who had striven to see the administration adopt a higher ideological purpose than national unity whose spirits brightened in the wake of Antietam, and their optimism arose more from Lincolns decree on emancipation. Those who awaited improvement in the military situation remained doubtful, and the complication of emancipation infuriated those Unionists who had feared all along that abolitionists were scheming to preempt their cause.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862»

Look at similar books to Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862»

Discussion, reviews of the book Lincolns Darkest Year: The War in 1862 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.