• Complain

Michael Genovese - The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature

Here you can read online Michael Genovese - The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2019, publisher: University of Virginia Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Virginia Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Attacks against the pursuit of profit in eighteenth-century Britain have been largely read as reactions against market activity in general or as critiques of financial innovation. In The Problem of Profit, however, Michael Genovese contends that such rejections of profit derive not from a distaste for moneymaking itself but from a distaste for individualism.

In the aftermath of the late seventeenth-century Financial Revolution, literature linked the concept of sympathy to the public-minded economic ideals of the past to resist the rising individualism of capitalism. This study places literary works at the center of eighteenth-century debates about how to harmonize exchanges of feeling and exchanges of finance, highlighting representations of communitarian, affective profit-making in georgic poetry as well as in the work of Joseph Addison, Daniel Defoe, Richard Steele, Sarah Fielding, Henry Fielding, David Hume, Samuel Johnson, and Laurence Sterne, among others. Investigating commercial treatises, novels, poetry, periodicals, and philosophy, Genovese argues that authors conjured alternatives to private accumulation that might counter the isolating tendencies of impersonal exchange.

However, even as emotional language and economic language arose together in the 1700s, the attendant aspiration to form a communitarian economy in Britain was not fulfilled. By recovering an approach to moneymaking that failed to thrive, The Problem of Profit argues for the relevance of an unfamiliar narrative of capitalistic thought to todays anxiety over the discord between personal ambition and public good.

Michael Genovese: author's other books


Who wrote The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Problem of Profit The Problem of Profit Finance and Feeling in - photo 1
The Problem of Profit
The Problem of Profit
Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature
Michael Genovese
University of Virginia Press
Charlottesville and London
University of Virginia Press
2019 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
All rights reserved
First published 2019
ISBN 978-0-8139-4289-6 (hardcover)
ISBN 978-0-8139-4290-2 (ebook)
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this title.
Cover art: Detail from The Arrest at the Compter, a Song, (1749?). (Courtesy of Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University)
Contents
The Problem of Profit began as a very different dissertation at the University of Virginia, and it would not have found its way as a book without the unconditional support and guidance of those I first met years ago. Their professional encouragement and constant belief in my work have been true gifts. I thank J. Paul Hunter, John OBrien, Alison Booth, and the late Gregory Colomb, who were there from the beginning, pushing for precision and thoroughness and always generous with their time and rigorous in their readings. I also am thankful for the mentorship that Patricia Meyer Spacks, Cynthia Wall, and Jennifer Wicke provided to a young graduate student in his early years. Rivka Swenson and Chloe Wigston Smith have inspired me as eighteenth-century scholars and as friends. I could not have asked for better readers and friends than Omaar Hena, Ellen Ledoux, Erich Nunn, David Sigler, and Eric Song, all of whom contributed in ways that always improved my writing and thinking. Finally, I am deeply grateful for the advice, comments, and assurance that Jill Rappoport gave me over the years. The success of this project owes much to her.
Many institutions provided fellowship and/or residential support for my writing and research. The University of Virginia and the University of Kentucky generously funded travel and research during my time at both institutions, and I am additionally grateful to Kentucky for the year of junior leave it provided. The resources of the Chawton House Library, the Newberry Library, the William Andrews Clark Library, and the Huntington Library were essential to my archival digging. Additionally, I am grateful for support from the National Endowment for the Humanities, which funded a summer of intense writing and a week of research at the Baker Library at Harvard Business School. The research staff at these libraries were immensely helpful, and thanks go to them all.
While teaching at Villanova University and during my career at the University of Kentucky, I have benefited from the mentoring and generosity of many colleagues. Evan Radcliffe, Seth Koven, and members of the Delaware Valley British Studies seminar offered advice at a key point. And at Kentucky I have been fortunate to receive the encouragement and guidance of a wonderful community of scholars: special thanks to Jonathan Allison, Frederick Bengtsson, Stefan Bird-Pollan, Jeffory Clymer, Andy Doolen, Matthew Giancarlo, Peter Kalliney, Joyce Macdonald, Ellen Rosenman, Emily Shortslef, Michelle Sizemore, Michael Trask, Nazera Wright, and Lisa Zunshine for all their help. This book is the outcome of innumerable conversations with these generous colleagues, and their many suggestions never failed to improve it.
Years ago, while participating in the Eighteenth-Century Reading Group at the University of Pennsylvania, I remarked that profit didnt have a history: either someone was making money or they werent, and that was that. Im happy that I turned out to be wrong. The friends I made during my time in PhiladelphiaDavid Alff, Toni Bowers, Gabriel Cervantes, Joseph Drury, Anna Foy, Michael Gamer, Suvir Kaul, Dahlia Porter, John Richetti, and Jared Richmanwere instrumental in sharpening my ideas through many conversations and chapter readings. I thank them all for their careful feedback on my work and for their unshaking commitment to honest criticism that only made it better.
I had the privilege to present early parts of my work on David Hume at UCLAs Eighteenth-Century Working Group, and I would like to thank the members of that groupespecially Sarah Kareem, Maximillian Novak, and Felicity Nussbaumfor their thoughtful comments and general advice on the project as a whole. Daniel Carey, Daniel Gross, Simon Stern, and Carl Wennerlind were valuable interlocutors over e-mail, and I am grateful for their responses to queries and for the insights they provided on my work.
My friends and colleagues in eighteenth-century studies have been sources of encouragement, knowledge, and inspiration throughout my career. Whether as panel or conference organizers, copanelists, or just fellow fans (or at least scholars!) of the period, they have provided endless opportunities for me to refine my thoughts and bounce ideas around over the course of many, many meals and gatherings. For all of the invaluable and challenging feedback on my work, I thank Misty Anderson, Liz Bellamy, Dwight Codr, Darryl Domingo, David Fairer, Nicole Horejsi, Catherine Ingrassia, Jacob Sider Jost, Jess Keiser, Paul Kelleher, Kathleen Lubey, Deidre Lynch, Jessica Richard, Courtney Weiss Smith, Vivasvan Soni, Howard Weinbrot, Brett Wilson, and Eugenia Zuroski, along with the many others I have already mentioned above. In addition to having my work honed over the years at conferences of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies, I was able to present my work at the Columbia Eighteenth-Century Seminars 50th Anniversary meeting and at a meeting of the Johnson Society of the Central Region. I am thankful to have had such a rich network of scholars to engage with over the years.
Part of chapter 2 first appeared as An Organic Commerce: Sociable Selfhood in Eighteenth-Century Georgic in Eighteenth-Century Studies 46.2, pp. 197221 (Copyright 2013 American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies). Part of chapter 4 first appeared as A Mixture of Bad in All: The Character of Self-Interest in Sarah Fieldings David Simple in The Age of Johnson 22 (2012): 20731. I am grateful to both journals for permission to reprint portions of those articles here. I would also like to thank the Huntington Library, the Lewis Walpole Library, and the Walters Art Museum for permissions to reproduce images. Angie Hogan, my editor at the University of Virginia Press, guided this manuscript on its way to becoming a book, and I am immensely grateful for all her work, as well as for the extensive improvements suggested by the anonymous reviewers. I could not have asked for more thorough, careful readers.
Finally, I thank my parents, Frank and Susan Genovese, for loving me and standing with me over these many years, and for always believing in this project. And I give special thanks to Brandy Anderson for her wisdom, love, and confidence. Always encouraging me and never settling for sloppy prose or vague thinking, she helped me carry this book to its end.
I dedicate this book to my sons, Isaac, Max, and Ezra, and my stepdaughter, Marlo. Their playfulness and laughter made the heaviest days lighter and reminded me that there is joy in not knowing what all that typing is about.
The Problem of Profit
To buy and sell, be the Employment of every man, more or less; and the Common People, for the most part, depend upon it for their daily subsistence.
Dudley North, Discourses upon Trade
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature»

Look at similar books to The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Problem of Profit: Finance and Feeling in Eighteenth-Century British Literature and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.