• Complain

Edward A. Bender - An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling

Here you can read online Edward A. Bender - An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2000, publisher: Dover Publications, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Edward A. Bender An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling
  • Book:
    An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Dover Publications
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2000
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Employing a practical, learn by doing approach, this 1st-rate text fosters the development of the skills beyond pure mathematics needed to set up and manipulate mathematical models. From a diversity of fields including science, engineering, and operations research come over 100 reality-based examples. 1978 edition. Includes 27 black-and-white figures.

Edward A. Bender: author's other books


Who wrote An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents APPENDIX SOME PROBABILISTIC BACKGROUND This appendix - photo 1
Table of Contents

APPENDIX SOME PROBABILISTIC BACKGROUND

This appendix contains a hasty survey of the probability theory needed in the text. It can be used as a review for those who have had some probability theory. For those who have not had any, it can be used as an adjunct to lectures on the subject.

A.1. THE NOTION OF PROBABILITY

If I toss a fair coin, what are the chances that it will come up heads? We expect to see 50% heads in the long run and so write

An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling - image 2

This is read, The probability of the event the coin lands heads up after this toss equals Picture 3 ; however, we shorten it to, The probability of heads equals Picture 4 .

What happens when we dont know the probability from a priori considerations? For example, what is the probability that a newborn baby will be a boy? We need to say very carefully what we mean. The fraction of newborn children who have been males in recent years has been 0.514 in the United States. Therefore we could say that the probability of a male child is 0.514 if the expectant mother is American. However, if you told me that she is a black American, I would recommend changing the probability to 0.506, since this is the observed fraction when the mother is a black American. Whats going on? The population Im looking at has changed from all babies recently born to American women to all babies recently born to black American women. Note that both these populations are drawn from the past; as in all of science Im assuming that the future will resemble the past. Although these considerations are essential for applications, they should not enter into the theoretical framework of probability theory to which we now turn our attention. The problem of estimating probabilities, to which Ive alluded above, comes up again in the last paragraph of Section A.5.


DEFINITION . Let be a finite set and let Pr be a function from to the nonnegative real numbers such that

An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling - image 5

(Note the braces instead of parentheses for the function.) We call the event set, the elements of the simple events, and Pr { e } the probability of the simple event e.


As an illustration, consider tossing a fair coin twice. The outcomes can be denoted by the obvious notation HH, HT, TH, and TT. We can think of these as simple events and write

= {HH, HT, TH, TT}.

Also, Picture 6 for each e . As another illustration, suppose that we toss the coin until a head occurs or until we have completed two tosses. Then the simple events can be denoted by 1, 2, and Fmeaning a head at the first toss, a head at the second toss, and a failure to obtain a head. These correspond, respectively, to H, TH, and TT in the previous notation. We have

Note that the simple events in both examples are mutually exclusive and - photo 7

Note that the simple events in both examples are mutually exclusive and exhaustive; that is, exactly one occurs. This is the case in all interpretations of simple events.

If we had tossed a coin twice in the last example, we could think of event 1 as being the occurrence of either of the two simple events, HH and HT. We would write this as 1 = {HH, TT}. Thus we would write

and read the left side as the probability of either HH or HT occurring More - photo 8

and read the left side as the probability of either HH or HT occurring. More generally,


DEFINITION. For any subset S of we define Pr { S } to be the sum of Pr { e } over all e S and refer to it as the probability that a simple event in S will occur or, briefly, the probability that S will occur.

We can estimate Pr { S } by sampling from in such a way that each elementary event e is chosen with probability Pr { e }. (For the examples given above, our sampling can be accomplished by repeatedly tossing the coin.) If N S of the elementary events in such a sample of size N lie in S, then N S /N is an estimate for Pr { S }. This is the idea behind Monte Carlo simulation. Well find it convenient to use the abbreviation Pr {statement} for Pr { S }, where S is the set of all e such that the statement is true if e S occurs and false if e S occurs. For example, in the two tosses of a fair coin, Pr { 1 head} stands for the probability of the set { HT, TH, HH } .

We need two other concepts. After defining them, Ill discuss them briefly.


DEFINITION . The conditional probability of A given B is defined to be Pr { A B }/Pr { B } and is denoted by Pr { A | B }. The sets of events A and B are called independent if

Pr { A B } = Pr { A } Pr { B }.

Conditional probability is interpreted as the probability that e A given that e B . We can think of this as restricting our attention to B: If we estimate probability by counting, as described earlier, we will estimate the probability that an event in B lies in A by N AB / NB . Since this equals ( N AB / N )/( N B /N ), we see that the definition of conditional probability agrees with the notion of restricting our attention to the events in B.

We can think of independence as follows. Knowing that e B gives no information about whether or not e A, since

(1)

by the definitions of conditional probability and independence By symmetry - photo 9

by the definitions of conditional probability and independence. By symmetry, the roles of A and B can be interchanged.

PROBLEMS
  1. Prove that Pr { A B } = Pr { A } + Pr { B } Pr { A B }.
  2. Two dice are thrown. All that matters is the sum of the two values. Formulate this in a probabilistic framework.
  3. We are looking at U.S. coins minted in the 1960s. Our interest is in denomination, date, and mint. Discuss some things we could consider and cast them all in the appropriate terminology, assuming that a simple event corresponds to observing a single coin. To begin with, what is ? Does it help to know the number of each type of coin that was minted? Why?
A.2. RANDOM VARIABLES

Were frequently not interested in simple events but only some real-valued function of them; for example, the number of heads in 100 tosses of a coin. A natural choice for the set of simple events is the 2100 possible sequences of heads and tails, but the function we wish to study takes on only 101 valuesa considerable reduction from 2100. The value of such a function depends on which simple event occurs, so it is a variable. Since it depends on something that is random, it is a random variable. Thus we have


DEFINITION. A random variable is a real-valued function defined on .


It is conventional to use capital letters for random variables. Instead of the functional notation X ( e ), one frequently writes simply X and talks about the value x of X . The function Pr { X x } is called the ( cumulative ) distribution function for X and is important in discussing continuous probabilities. (See Section A.4.) By our convention regarding Pr {statement}, it equals the sum of Pr { e } over all elementary events e with X ( e ) x .

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling»

Look at similar books to An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling»

Discussion, reviews of the book An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.