• Complain

Grant - With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant

Here you can read online Grant - With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Great Britain, year: 2015, publisher: Pan Macmillan UK;Picador Classic, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Grant With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant
  • Book:
    With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Pan Macmillan UK;Picador Classic
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • City:
    Great Britain
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This collection of diary entries follows Richard E. Grants career from the cult movie Withnail and I to his experiences in Hollywood on such films as The Player and Dracula. When, in the summer of 1986, Richard E. Grant was cast as the lead in Withnail and I, his whole world shifted and suddenly he was set firmly on the path to international stardom. With Nails is his outrageous, irreverent and brutally funny account of that time and the years afterwards, of his self-doubt and anxiety on the route to Hollywood, and of all the extraordinary, mad, brilliant people in the film business. From drinking himself incoherent to film With Nail and I to a night spent in Pariss red light district with a world-famous couple, to working with Hollywoods biggest actors and directors, Richard E. Grant - always eloquent, always honest - has documented, in his own inimitable style, what it is to become a film star.

With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

With Nails

THE FILM DIARIES OF

Richard E. Grant

With an introduction by

STEVE MARTIN

PICADOR CLASSIC

Introduction: REG RAW

Between 1995 and 2000, REG (Richard E. Grant) and I communicated by faxyes, faxafter becoming friends when we worked together on the film L.A. Story. REGs faxes to me were composed on a typewriter set with wide margins, jammed up with no spaces between sentences and paragraphsand very selective capitalization. When viewed from a distance, a single page looked like it had been overtaken by an army of disorderly ants.

I kept these faxes, which grew to a stack over two inches thick, because they entertained me, and because I thought they were valuable esthetic chunks from a screeching mind, a stream of consciousness faucet spewing sentencessometimes a mile longwithout rewriting and bearing just the right amount of acid and alkaline. Here is his description of the director Stephen Poliakoff, transcribed keystroke for keystroke:

He is a miniature clone of Stanley Kubrick in the looks dept.i.e: no chin,pubic beard scrawling everywhere,fat and sloshy lower lip,huge eyes and poodle curly tousled hair,all of which is untidily held together in a cardigan,collapsed tweed jacket and fucked corduroy pants,above his flat-footed scuffed brogues. A walking un-made bed,who slurps coffee,scratches his arse mid conversation with the conviction of someone expecting a tooth to be coming through down below, dribbles, gurgles and re-locates bits of his fast eaten lunch in the lower sections of the beard,is knock-kneed,a few inches higher than five feet, compulsively says ok,alright then,ok?alright then ok?,ok,alright then,whilst circling round his own thoughts,all the time twiddling a straw in the left hand,like a miniature helicopter in full flight,and has even called ACTION! before the boom is even dangling or actors fully assembled.YET. He is so passionate about his words,characters , situations,so opinionated about everything, informed and intellectually ferocious,that you CANNOT dislike the little dweezil.

The downside of rereading all of Richards effervescent faxes to me was rediscovering a computer file that contained all of my letters and faxes to him. I was swept up in his style and tried to emulate it, and consequently my letters lay flat and dead on the page. Plus, in one of them, I was reminded of the headline of a bad movie review Id received. After a critic had sniped at him, Id sent it to Richard in order to offer some salve: TIRED MARTIN REHASHES HUMORLESS BORE . You might notice, as I did, that every word of that banner, with the exception of my name, is negative. This is how actors cheer each other up: I got a review worse than yours.

Richard, I should add, has an abilitywhich I shall call charmto relax anyone into a state of comfort that might take others three years of regular tea parties and intimate lunches to achieve. Once, after only five minutes of sitting next to a woman at a dinner party, he was asking about the duration and flow of her menstrual cycle. The question seemed reasonable at the time, and no one was bothered or offended. I can assure you this is true because I was there, and the woman was my wife-to-be.

In reading his faxes, most written after his film diaries were published, I noticed many well-known names are mentioned, and some of those well-known names arent so well known today, yet the observations about them are compelling. I understood that while Richard was writing about individuals, he was also writing about human types, and we no longer needed to know exactly who they were in order to appreciate their foibles (again, keystroke for keystroke):

The penalty for being an aging actress seems especially loaded with cruelties.Currently accruing,with interest,upon the head of [Miss X].Who is now facing a crisis of beauty. For herein has resided the source of all her worldly powers since she stepped onto our screens FIFTEEN YEARS AGO.Now 36, having coasted through twenty lead roles in films of variable quality,more often than not,notable for how many times she slung off her bra,she now faces the terrors of playing THE MUM.Of a spectacularly gorgeous 20 year old.Upon whose poised young head,our director lavishes all his waking attention.To the point where,having rehearsed [her] in the most intimate one-to-one mode this side of actually licking her all over,announces Right,lets go for a take! At which point she yodels up with her plea, What about me?.His eyes momentarily flicker recognition that this other person is actually breathing,looks quizzical,decides No,you are fineturns on his heels and moseys to the monitor. Not that she has metamorphosed into an old boiler overnight. BUT.Her powerbase,if you can call it that,was her beauty.The reliable eyelid flutter and dulcet tones that commandeered men,rooms,service,cash, contracts,attention,with the ease and relish that a repulsive,height impaired fatfuck gets from breaking wind violently and daring anyone to sneerNow this may sound glee-filled and serves you right coming from me,but,for once,I am filling up somewhere with the faintest trickle of pity.Because,this vulnerability is the human stuff that joins us all.

Throughout the pages, with fax headers telling me the exact dates of delivery and typed like archy of archy and mehitabel (the early twentieth-century office insect who wrote at night by leaping onto the keys of a typewriter and therefore couldnt use the shift key), are moments of career analysis:

as the flick I was scheduled to shoot in south africa in may has gone kaput,i may well come to l.a. in june to squat on my agents horrible little head for a couple of weeks to see whether there is any chance of breathing life into the inert corpse of my american career.

... analysis of his profession:

A lawyer in my ski group said, whilst engulfing the chair-lift with her posterior,that acting is not that special.Just a job like anything else.Yeah,thought I,suppressing a supreme urge to tip her out,sure honey : every time you do something,anyone and everyone is a fucking critical expert,in print and in person. You try maintaining some equilibrium in the face of that scrutiny and sure as hell,you will need another lawyer to maneuver your shattered self-esteem back on course.

... and self-analysis:

my self-loathing propensity for vitriol is a warped form of intimacy. This was a form of intimacy between my father and me.so that my most familiar way into a buddy-buddy situation with another human is to establish a slag-fest collusion..Nothing thrills me more than to sit down at this enclosed, hidden,secret world of my computer,banging out messages.

Along the way, I was re-amused by this observation:

I suspect the number of folk who maintain proper friendships with their exs,is on a par with,with.Swiss Sea battles?

And this opener from a fax of August of 1996:

SteveJust got back from a weeks break,went to the south of France en famille to our house and had perfect weather,sex and enough garlic to kickstart a dead donkey.

And this one quoting his wife, Joan Washington:

I spoke to Joan (who is in France) and she said I think we should just pull up the draw-bridge and not let anyone else in who is full of shit.

And finally this, from one of the earliest communications, received on February 18, 1995

I HAVE LANDED MYSELF A LITERARY AGENT AS A RESULT OF MY PRET A PORTER DIARIES PUBLISHED IN THE SUNDAY OBSERVER LAST SUMMER AND SUBSEQUENTLY HAD THE PLEASURES AND TERROR OF A PUBLISHERS AUCTION. THE HIGHEST BIDDER WAS MACMILLAN-PICADOR WHO HAVE AGREED TO PAY ME TO WRITE UP MY COLLECTED DIARIES AND LETTERS FROM THE MAKING OF WITHNAIL THROUGH TO PRET A READY TO WEAR.ASSUMING MY ARSE IS NOT STRAPPED WITH A LIBEL CASE FROM MESSRS WILLIS,BERNHARD AND CO.? I CANNOT TELL YOU HOW PLEASURABLE IT WAS TO GO INTO VARIOUS PUBLISHING HOUSES AND HAVE A BOARD ROOM OF ADULTS BLOW SMOKEY PRAISE UP WHERE IT COUNTS,AND FOR ONCE NOT TO BE SOME DIRECTORS OR PRODUCERS NAME ON A LONG LIST.IT IS THE FIRST TIME IN MY DOZEN YEARS OF DOING THIS SHOWBIZNESS THUNG,THAT I HAVE FELT SOME RATS FART WORTH OF CONTROL .THAT THE WRITING IS SOMETHING IN MY HAND THAT I CAN THWATT DOWN ON A DESK AND SAY TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT FUCKERS ,RATHER THAN THAT MIMSY-MAYBE YO-YO OF THE CASTING CIRCUSA REVELATION TO THIS TIRED OLD HEAD!!MY DEADLINE IS JUNE FIRSTTHE TOME TO BE TITLED WITH NAILS AND MAY WELL BE PROPHETIC IN ENDING MY FEW FRIENDSHIPS AND CRUCIFYING WHATS LEFT OF MY CAREER. BUT ON A GOOD DAY,THE WRITING FLOWS LIKE.AND ON THE BAD ONES LIKE QUICK DRYING CEMENT.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant»

Look at similar books to With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant»

Discussion, reviews of the book With nails: the film diaries of Richard E. Grant and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.