• Complain

Michael Musto - Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back

Here you can read online Michael Musto - Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Open Road Media, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Michael Musto Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back
  • Book:
    Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Open Road Media
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

For over a quarter of a century, Michael Musto entertained the country with his column La Dolce Musto in the Village Voice; fabulous, funny, and flippant, this collection is an insiders guide to the glittering highs and desperate lows of New York Citys more colorful residents
Hailed by the New York Times as the citys most punny, raunchy, and self-referential gossip columnist, Michael Musto doled out wit and wisdom in his weekly Village Voice column for twenty-nine years. This waggish and wise book contains highlights from his published pieces as well as several original essays.
With his trademark slashing humor, Musto weighs in on everything from celebrities in need of counseling to cheap thrillseeking and why weirdos are his heroes. No one is spared, including the self-proclaimed King of Gossip himself. His interviews and profiles of Paris Hilton, Sandra Bernhard, Crispin Glover, Kiki and Herb, Sarah Silverman, and other fringe celebrities are priceless, made all the more vivid by Mustos extraordinary access. Catty, titillating, and endlessly enthralling, Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back is a feast for the sensesa must-have book for Musto devotees and fans of popular culture.
This ebook features an introduction by the author.

Michael Musto: author's other books


Who wrote Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Fork on the Left Knife in the Back Michael Musto To everyone who is - photo 1
Fork on the Left Knife in the Back Michael Musto To everyone who is - photo 2

Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back

Michael Musto

To everyone who is still speaking to me CONTENTS Everyone Shut Up About - photo 3

To everyone who is still speaking to me.

CONTENTS

Everyone Shut Up About Ellen Degeneres

D-DAY IS ALMOST upon usyou know, Dyke Daywhen Ellen Morgan will join her better half, Ellen DeGeneres, in that well-furnished expanse outside the closet. But before that April 30 landmark comes Drama Queen Daytodaywhen I get to address all the naysayers whove contented that this is a crass or inadvisable move. Lets pray its the last blast of hot air on the subject. See, its my humble estimation that the most crass, inadvisable move of all has been the masturbatory should-she-or-shouldnt-she speculation thats cropped up in the supposedly liberal press. While its true that ABC and Ellen teased us with a few hundred too many Lebanese jokes, the real downside of that was it allowed critics free reign to second-guess this nervy venture, virtually canvassing the entire country about it in negativity-laden polls and articles.

These people are even more cynical than the network. Why did everyone have to agree that Ellen should be gay before it could be etched in stone (or pillow)? Do they ring doorbells and ask if Jane Seymour should make out with that long-haired guy, or, for that matter, if there should be a Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman? And why have even the opinion makers whove given the revelation a thumbs-up made sure to add, But lots of people arent going to like this? Who cares? Let them watch something elseif they can find something that wont violate their refined sensibilities. While theyre doing so, why dont the ink-stained wretches just help the future arrive faster instead of voicing the same namby-pamby reservations we heard when blacks first got sitcoms? Maybe they can go back to worrying about whether Diahann Carroll should be Julia.

The truth is, Im not really mad at ABC anymoreexcept for their having hypocritically turned down gay advertising on the episode. Ive almost forgiven their dicking us around (some feel this has actually provided a much needed desensitization process) and have even given in to all the glitz and guest stars, because at least theyll ensure that the coming out is put over in the biggest way possible. What Im really mad about are all the counterproductive responses you still hear, like, Lets hope Ellen doesnt feel trapped by the limitations of the gay label (no, dears, its the closet that has limitations); The Ellen twist doesnt make sense because the character started out straight (no, kids, just confusedeven DeGeneres had a boyfriend once); and This is nothing but a show-saving gimmickas if closet busting is such a simple, effortless way to nab ratings. If it is, lets have the gay lead actors and characters on all those other faltering shows announce their homosexuality right this second to their waning audiences. Im waiting!

Even if Ellen were using her lesbianism to grab an audience, shouldnt she be commended for turning honesty into a selling point? Wouldnt it be a wonderful new world if you could make your open gayness pay off for some kind of instant appeal? If the most predictable thing for a showbiz queer to say was, Hey, guys, its sweeps week. Lets come out!?

Insanely enough, its the very writers who think the coming out is a career-saving device who also say its a problematic move that lots of people wont like. How can it be both? I wish everyone except me would just shut the fuck up on the matter. In twentyno, twoyears, historians will look back at all this hilarity and say, Can you believe they had to have months of discussion about whether a fictional character should be gay? And then when the actress came out in her own tormented manner, people accused her of being cheap and calculating! It is to laugh.

Can Singing Siamese Twins Outshine George Michaels Bathroom Stunt?

THINGS THAT MAKE me mad, part whatever: First off, Im horrified that the Tony Awards committee decided that the two actresses who played the Siamese twins in Side Show can be nominated together, as a rule-breaking doppelganger duo. This is a slap in the faces of the other potential nominees, who will now have the disadvantage of competing as single human beings. And didnt any of the people involved in the decision (including the shows producers, who lobbied for the joint, as it were, nomination) see Side Show? The whole point was that, even if they shared embarrassing body parts, the twinsies were completely separate entities with vastly different dreams and personalities. They sang and danced about this theme for over two hours! Hello?

Whats more, I saw another Tony aspirant, the revival of The Chairs, and was furious that the two star characterspractically twinsare basically waiting for a mime; that, while the play didnt live up to my greatest fears of Ionesco (you know, What time is it? Pineapple), its still pretty fucked up; and that the whole thing leads up to a written phrase which, from where I was sitting, was so obscured it looked like, God Says Oy. And that I loved it!

What else? Oh yeah, I was all set to have my own absurdist evening at Jimmys Bronx Caf, the gigantic dance club up on West Fordham Road, until socialite Sandy Hillcelebrating her birthday there, on her first big slumming adventure since her controversial trip to a bigger hill (Everest)wisely decreed that this time she didnt want press. And in other mounting news, I was livid that Disney dropped ex-MTV VJ Simon Rex from the cast of a sitcom pilot because of his adult-film pastas if porno is any more shameful than some of those awful series! Besides, as the columnist who originally ran the movie still of Simon with a raging hard-on, I actually saw the guys body of work and know that all he did on film was jerk off. Do the jerk-offs at Disney not jerk off?

And does that same harmless gesture constitute the lewd act George Michael was supposedly performing in that bathroom a few weeks ago (no ones officially told us yet, though Howard Stern listeners seem to know the loo-down)? Or was George making provocative shapes out of paper towels? And was there ever any doubt about the guys sexuality anyway, not because hes Greek, but because he was once reported to be dating Brooke Shields? And hasnt Boy George (who was also sexually ambiguous when he was famous) been screaming for years that a girl Michael was supposedly enamored of used to be Boys own platonic fag hag? God says oy!

And who the hell is Jonathan Harris (Dr. Smith from the TV version of Lost in Space) trying to fool by saying his persnickety character was by no means gay? Dr. Smith not gay? PleaseIm sure he hung out in that very same bathroom. And is it true that a certain TV teen was set to make a big coming-out splash in a queer magazine until the powers-that-be made sure he crawled right back into that closet, where he can fend off attitude from Dr. Smith?

And by the way, how can the Teletubbies people not rush to confirm that the purple one, Tinky Winky, is gay, when not only does he carry a smartly chosen handbag, but the last time I turned in, he was twirling around in a festive tutu? And isnt it weird that muscle queens are now saying I lash out at them because Im jealous that they dont pay me enough attention? If so, wouldnt that underline my very pointthat body fascists only have time for one another, leaving non-muscled queens oppressed by both straights and gays? But Ill stop adding to the problem by demonizing themor at least try to, between pumps. Wearing them, that is.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back»

Look at similar books to Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back»

Discussion, reviews of the book Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.