• Complain

Douglas Nick - Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less

Here you can read online Douglas Nick - Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2009, publisher: HarperCollins e-books, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Douglas Nick Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less

Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

SUMMARY:
New York Magazine proclaims, Twitter is the hot web company right now...the Next Big Thing; the New York Times calls it one of the fastest-growing phenomena on the Internet; Time magazine claims Twitter is on its way to becoming the next killer app; and Newsweek notes that Suddenly, it seems as though all the worlds a-twitter. Since its creation in March 2006, Twitter has unleashed a torrent of self-expression from its six million members around the world, who send and read each others tweets, messages up to 140 characters in length. Friends use the site to make plans; relatives use it to stay connected; politicians use it to lobby for votes; and humorists use it to perfect their craft. In fact, Twitter users have reinvented the classic medium of the witticism in a site where anyone can be a Dorothy Parker or an Oscar Wilde. Twitter Wit is the first compilation of Twitter aphorisms, with submissions ranging from quotidian vignettes like I bet in Sweden the Ikea instructions are in English to bumper sticker-type quips like I think the bird of love is the dove. My husband thinks its the swallow, and contributors ranging from celebrities like Shaquille ONeal, Jimmy Fallon, Penn Jillette, John Cleese, and Steven Fry to regular people with previously unappreciated sharp tongues. Featuring a foreword by Twitter co-founder Biz Stone, this authorized anthology of the thousand most most clever and memorable tweets relates the diversity of human experience in hilarious bite-sized pieces.

Douglas Nick: author's other books


Who wrote Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Twitter Wit
Brilliance in 140 Characters or Less
Edited by Nick Douglas
With a Foreword by Biz Stone
Its easy to assign less weight to a pun than a poemafter all laughter lightens - photo 1
Its easy to assign less weight to a pun than a poemafter all, laughter lightens the load. However, the significance of humor as a delivery mechanism for important information should not be underestimated. Satirist Stephen Colbert called Twitter the answer to the question you didnt know you had until you had the answer. In poking fun at this new form of communication, Mr. Colbert highlighted the very essence of innovation; breakthroughs like Twitter often occur by happy accident. In the past decade, something interesting has been happening.

People have been moving their electronic communication from closed systems like e-mail to open systems like social networks. Theres more value in messages shared publicly because more opportunities arise. A kind of social alchemy takes place when a seemingly valueless message finds its way to someone for whom it strikes a chord. Lead can be turned into gold on an open communication network. Simple, rudimentary exchanges of information between individuals in real time enables a flock of birds to move around an object in flight as if they were one organism. Speed and simplicity work together to create something of beauty.

There are over a billion Internet users on this planet but there are four billion people with access to mobile texting. Twitter blends these networks with speed and simplicity and opens the combination to development. That means more opportunities for beautyand well-timed zingers. The first weekend we began experimenting with the concept of Twitter, I was tearing carpeting from the floor of my home in Berkeley, California. It was a hot day and my back was aching. My phone buzzed in my pocket.

It was a tweet by my friend and long-time collaborator Evan Williams: Sipping pinot noir in Sonoma after a massage. The striking difference between our two activities in that moment made me laugh out loud. When I realized our experiment was making me laugh, I knew it had potential. Weve seen people use Twitter to help each other during disasters, to break incredible news, to raise money for charities halfway around the world, to organize protests, to fight injustice, and simply to have fun. Through it all, there has been quickness, grace, simplicity, and humorthere has been wit. No matter how sophisticated the system becomes, it will never be about algorithms and machines.

Wit is a powerful reminder that Twitter is not about the triumph of technology; its about the triumph of humanity. However, Oscar Wilde famously wrote, It is a curious fact that people are never so trivial as when they take themselves seriously. As powerful as this system has the potential to be, wed be nowhere without a good dose of funny. Humor makes life worth the effort. If everyone were serious all the time, Im pretty sure wed never get any work done. Were hiring pretty aggressively at our company these days, and key factors we look for are a good sense of humor and an active Twitter account.

Some of my favorite tweets are those that make me laugh all over again each time I revisit them. My friend Philip is an incredibly brilliant person. Hes a musically and mathematically gifted serial entrepreneur with a goofy laugh and an impressive array of idiosyncrasies. Hes also very tall and quintessentially geeky. In the middle of the night he Twittered, Taking a bath. Come over if you want to learn about water displacement.

It wouldnt surprise me to learn that he was prepared to discuss fluid mechanics with anyone who responded. Wit is a wonderful word to associate with something that may turn out to be a favorable mutation in the evolution of human communication. Sharp, quick, inventive, and intelligent, with a natural aptitude for words, ideas, and humor: The very definition of wit brings to mind the people with whom I share my days. The heart of Twitter is the small team of folks working out of a loft in San Francisco, but our soul is made up of everyone around the world sharing, discovering, and building on this service. A spark of genius from my friend and cofounder Jack Dorsey has transmuted from a simple idea to something mysteriously powerful. Given a limit of 140 characters, people consistently reaffirm that creativity is a renewable resource.

Its easy to dismiss this simple new format upon first introduction, but tune in to the right frequency and youll enter a world this books curator wanders as a curious explorer. Keep your wits about you and enjoy this collection of Twitticisms. Nick worked hard to harvest the best. Biz Stone (biz), Cofounder
Twitter, Inc.

Twitter, said user Henry Birdseyeor, on Twitter, tehawesomeis that friend you can turn to and say, This is bullshit, when theres no one else around. Of course, Twitter is plenty more.

Technically, its simply a social network where millions of users send text-message-length status updates to a list of followers. As a simple platform for sharing messages of up to 140 characters, Twitter makes no demands of genre or intent. Since it began in 2006, the only guideline on the site is the prompt, What are you doing? The most interesting users ignore that. The Twitter format serves a few forms of information particularly well: on-the-spot news updates, or questions like, Anyone know a lawyer? Its particularly great for whining or bragging. But the perfect use of Twitter, what the platform is practically destined for, is the witty one-liner. Comedy always takes too long.

The easiest way to improve any joke is to shorten it. And Twitter makes you do that. Even the British comedian Russell Brand (rustyrockets) has snipped out the spaces between words, struggling to fit a three-sentence joke into 140 characters. One of my favorite Twitter gags is just seven words long: You know what this guitar needs? Lessons (Tony_D). Twitter is the modern haiku, albeit with fewer cherry blossoms and more wisecracks. Brevity is, here, the soul of wit.

The tweets in this book came from hundreds of users. Anyone can write one particularly funny tweet. Thats the democratic beauty of the one-liner. But some people turn Twitter wit into an obsession. They hit the star next to other peoples funny tweets, so the tweets show up on third-party sites like Favrd and Favotter. Every day Favrd shows the most-starred tweets, drawn from a growing pool of hundreds of star-conscious Twitter users, not just as a popularity contest but as a way to find more wits to follow.

The Twitter wits chasing these stars often meet in person. Avery Edison and Abby Finkelman (aedison and clapifyoulikeme) met on Twitter, then got engaged over it. Scott Simpson, Merlin Mann, and Adam Lisagor (scottsimpson, hotdogs-ladies, and lonelysandwich) started a comedy show online called You Look Nice Today. And, of course, this book wouldnt be here without the contributions of hundreds of witty Twitterers. The Twitter wits dont consider themselves an Algonquin Round Table, no matter how many times I try to label them as such. But Round Table member Dorothy Parkers assessment of New Yorks casual club of comedians applies to funny Twitter users as well: Just a bunch of loudmouths showing off, saving their gags for days, waiting for a chance to spring them.

Of course, then Ms. Parker says, It was the terrible day of the wisecrack, so there didnt have to be any truth. Thats not true of the Twitter wits. During the 2008 presidential election, they spread a populist kind of political commentary. When Sarah Palin announced her daughters pregnancy, John Gruber (gruber) Twittered, The press should only pay as much attention to this story as they would have if, say, Chelsea Clinton had gotten pregnant at 17. These back-row-of-the-country remarks, which feel like Jon Stewarts Daily Show commentary in real time, climaxed in Scott Simpsons verdict on the second presidential debate: That won.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less»

Look at similar books to Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less»

Discussion, reviews of the book Twitter Wit: Brilliance in 140 Characters Or Less and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.