• Complain

Angus Vine - Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge

Here you can read online Angus Vine - Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Oxford, year: 2019, publisher: Oxford University Press, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Angus Vine Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge
  • Book:
    Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • City:
    Oxford
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book examines one of the most pervasive, but also perplexing, textual phenomena of the early modern world: the manuscript miscellany. Faced with multiple problems of definition, categorization, and (often conflicting) terminology, modern scholars have tended to dismiss the miscellany as
disorganized and chaotic. Miscellaneous Order radically challenges that view by uncovering the various forms of organization and order previously hidden in early modern manuscript books. Drawing on original literary and historical research, and examining both the materiality of early modern
manuscripts and their contents, this book sheds new light on the transcriptive and archival practices of early modern Britain, as well as on the broader intellectual context of manuscript culture and its scholarly afterlives.
Based on extensive archival research, and interdisciplinary in both subject and matter, Miscellaneous Order focuses on the myriad kinds of manuscript compiled and produced in the early modern era. Showing that the miscellany was essential to the organization of knowledge across a range of genres and
disciplines, from poetry to science, and from recipe books to accounts, it proposes a new model for understanding the proliferation of manuscript material in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. By restoring attention to miscellaneous order in this way, it shows that we have fundamentally
misunderstood how early modern men and women read, wrote, and thought. Rather than a textual form characterized by an absence of order, the miscellany, it argues, operated as an epistemically and aesthetically productive system throughout the early modern period.

Angus Vine: author's other books


Who wrote Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Miscellaneous Order Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge - image 1
Miscellaneous Order

Miscellaneous Order Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge - image 2

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries

Angus Vine 2019

The moral rights of the author have been asserted

First Edition published in 2019

Impression: 1

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data available

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018946876

ISBN 9780198809708

ebook ISBN 9780192563330

Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY

Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.

Acknowledgements

In the spring of 2008 things were starting to look grim. I had spent the past three years on a research fellowship at the Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities (CRASSH) at the University of Cambridge, happily researching and writing about Sir Francis Bacons manuscripts. But the funding was running out and I needed to find an alternative position fast. By chance, in May that year, a couple of jobs were advertised on the AHRC-funded Scriptorium: Medieval and Early Modern Manuscripts Online project. I applied for one of these and was fortunate enough to be called to interview. At that interview, members of the project team asked me a series of questions about manuscript culture, about transcription and editorial policy, and about digital resources, most of which I had anticipated in one form or another. But then Colin Burrow asked me about the relationship between miscellany culture and antiquarianism, a question that I had very definitely not anticipated. I managed to give an off-the-cuff response, as interview etiquette (and good sense) demanded, but it struck me then that this characteristically searching question deserved much more careful thought. Nearly a decade later, this book is, in part, my more considered (and, I think, rather more satisfactory) answer to that question.

Happily, I still managed to get the job and spent an extremely rewarding year (20089) working as the Senior Research Associate on the project. The origins of this book, in terms of content as well as conception, date back to that time. Considerable thanks, therefore, go to all my colleagues on the Scriptorium project: Richard Beadle, Christopher Burlinson, Colin Burrow, Raphael Lyne, Sebastiaan Verweij, and Andrew Zurcher. Most of this book, though, was researched and written first at the University of Sussex and then at the University of Stirling (in the School of English and the Division of Literature and Languages respectively). Thanks go to my former colleagues in the Centre for Early Modern Studies at Sussex, but especially to Tom and Margaret Healy. At Stirling, I am similarly grateful to all my colleagues in English Studies; collegiality really is a wonderful thing. Thanks also go to John Drakakis, retired by the time I moved to Stirling, but who has done so much to make me welcome in Scotland.

Inevitably for a project this long in the making, I have incurred a number of debts, financial as well as intellectual and personal, and it is a great pleasure to have this opportunity to acknowledge all the help and support that I have received. In 200910 I was privileged to receive a short-term fellowship at the Folger Shakespeare Library, which allowed me to spend two wonderful months in Washington, DC, and to undertake preliminary archival work for this project in the most congenial and stimulating of settings. A quick glance at the bibliography will reveal how important the Folger has been to the project. Without the financial support of the British Academy, the project would also have been impossible: in 201315 I received a BA/Leverhulme Small Research Grant (reference: SG121302) for the project Manuscripts, Miscellanies, and the Organization of Knowledge. That grant funded much of the archival research which has ended up in the book. Additional thanks go to the School of English at the University of Sussex, who funded a return visit to the Folger in 2011, and to the School of Arts and Humanities Initiatives Fund at the University of Stirling, which enabled me to spend a concentrated period working on Hugh Plats manuscripts in the British Library (research which ended up as of this book). Thanks also go to the Division of Literature and Languages at Stirling, who kindly paid for the illustrations. I am immensely grateful, too, to the University of Stirling for granting me research leave in 2015, without which researching and writing an archival book project such as this would have been extremely difficult.

Over the past ten years I have profited enormously from numerous conversations about manuscript culture with friends and colleagues. Since 2012, I have spoken to Katie Halsey more than anyone about this project; from drafting the initial proposal to finishing the final chapter, I have benefited enormously from her friendship, perspicacity, and rigour. Alastair Craft, Hester Lees-Jeffries, Andrew Rudd, and Jane Slinn have, in different ways, been amongst the greatest supporters of this project. I am hugely grateful to them all, and for their friendship and company as much as anything. Thanks, too, go to Andrew for helping me to finalize the title of the book. I am similarly grateful to David Manning, who first heard me talk about early modern manuscripts at the Shakespeare Institute in 2010, and has been a constant source of recommendations and references since. I thank him, in particular, for the freezing afternoon in the away end at Brunton Park when we ended up discussing many of my final ideas for the book. Hearty thanks, too, go to Ayesha Mukherjee for encouraging me to look at Hugh Plats manuscripts in the first place and for persuading me to persevere with them when Plats tiny hand was threatening to get the better of me. Elaine Leong kindly shared unpublished work; I hope that one day Ill be able to repay the favour. Peter Beal was one of the earliest supporters of the project, and like everyone working on early modern manuscripts, I have benefited hugely from his magisterial Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts 14501700 () owes a considerable debt to our collaboration over the years. Thanks, too, to Alan Stewart for the encouragement and support over the same period, and also for persuading me that the book really did need a bit more Aulus Gellius. In the final stages of the project, my former student Peter Buchanan acted as an unofficial research assistant, checking references for me in the Bodleian Library and the British Library, and thus saving me a series of costly journeys at busy times; I am immensely grateful to him. Thanks, too, to the following for comments, suggestions, and otherwise assisting in different ways: Danile Berton-Charrire, Carol Brobeck, Douglas Brodie, Piers Brown, Eric Castillo, Jim Caudle, Stephen Clucas, Liz Elliott, Ken Emond, Sietske Fransen, Jonathan Gibson, Ralf Hertel, Valerie Hotchkiss, Luke Houghton, Adrian Hunter, Dana Jalobeanu, Andrs Kisry, Peter Lindfield, Tom Lockwood, Mauricio Lopez, Kathryn McKee, the late Ann Moss, Anthony Ossa-Richardson, Jane Partner, Sandy Paul, Nick Popper, Adrienne Sharpe, Abi Shinn, Jonathan Smith, Julia Smith, Joe Sterrett, Adrian Streete, Dale Townshend, Sir Brian Vickers, Alison Wiggins, Kelsey Jackson Williams, Heather Wolfe, Dustin Frazier Wood, and Richard Yeo.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge»

Look at similar books to Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge»

Discussion, reviews of the book Miscellaneous Order: Manuscript Culture and the Early Modern Organization of Knowledge and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.