The Bul ys Playground
The Bullys Playground
A Modern Take on Despotism in the US
A Modern Take on Despotism in the US
As Written by a Fellow Citizen As Written by a Fellow Citizen Second Edition
By John Alexander-Pasion Sayson
In complete dedication to all of the people who have been a part of and have gone as far as to lead this freedom-loving place for countless generations.
And for my cousins and my uncle as well
If You Can Ask For My Humble Opinion, as a United States Citizen
Groups with a free and fruitful mindset can come in a certain time in history (as shown in the past) to be called to restore a sense of peace for people, by people in times of hardship, but with the ability to empower each other, a soulful and selfless action of giving and expressing each others love, we as a people of this country can work through this
hardship with the skillful art of the humble perspective of self-giving.
Peace and our free-will
It can be sensed that a malintent toward others can be defined by others as the intent to bully, or control.
This bully, the person with the mindset of that control, can bring about fear in other people. In other words, the feeling of fear can incite a sense of panic which is never good, in that simple regard
What is the bully mentality ?
A group of people can come together through some form of a guide which leads them to a common ground, a destination. But some can ask what sort of mindset any person in that group may have! Would the end goal be for the termination of life, life itself, or rebirth?
These carefully constructed words can be called by someone with a love for people, down to him or herself, and we can search in us deeply what the mindset of any
bully with intent for any role in this society
will be with the sort of mentality, or mindset, that is neither for life or death.
And one can say, the bully is part of the herd. That sort of person with that herd-
like mentality didnt have any good intentions at all.
If a Person of Peace Leads himself from the Group
What will the bully do to try to preserve himself in the group he wants to control? Will he want to punish any person in the group, further control it through any means necessary, or simply let that person leave? If anyone leaves and he tries to control it through incentive means, he may eventually incite a feeling of fear, which through his words, may cause an opposing force of others against others and themselves, inevitably leading to fear of the bully.
Would the bully define this innate gut reaction as so?
Or would the bully face his own reality and see his facts as self -evident?
Whose facts, however ?
His own or what we have seen to have been caused by the Bully himself?
When people are empowered, we
work together no matter what creed, or simply, belief. That bad person had people against him, and history then repeats itself with tools used to do so, as with rulers and
other pro-war leaders. Things can go out of hand, and the playground was made a mess full of sand, or a brick wall has just plummeted to the ground.
He had an incentive to control others, therefore, it was very natural for others to oppose that evil person. The guide, or the bully did not hold himself to be accountable for any of his bad intentions, with no empathy at all.
It is to my belief and experience that people are necessary to hold a staple in that invaluable and boundless sense of humanity in
order to ensure a brighter future for other Americans and for each other man, down to every human citizen, and even non-citizens living in the United States, in that regard.
Why does anyone have a bad intention in the first place?
Did they want to gain something in hindsight of others, whether it be taking your soccer ball from your friend when hes not looking and throwing it over his fence, lending money behind someone elses back, or simply telling someone that theyll be there for them when theyre not?
Do others even work together, with people, no matter of race, religion, or gender?
We can ask each other this easy question personally in and out of ourselves.
All it takes is an introspective pus h.
Paper, needless and obvious to say comes from trees and soil, and those who work with their hands can be referred to as
handy-men, or just as workers in the working class. But how is paper created today? By automation or from actual people?
Automated machinery in modern society does not construct by hand or sweat, therefore they lack any humanity. They do
not have a human soul whatsoever. Therefore, these machines can be referred to as something even below animalistic. They can even be thought of and labeled as brazen, super-smart insects. For the average citizen, it is preferrable in modern to society to work for however long and to be given by an hourly wage of any small or high amount depending on their current living and family conditions.
Everyone and all walks of life deserve a fair say in how they would like to live, notably those who are being forced into the chains of low-income.
Anyone can say that a guide receiving a fixed or variable income can be seen as a teacher. Now, a teacher is naturally faced with his or her class. But a teacher
does not do what a teacher with malintent does.
He or she guides the class of children, and the children progress to adolescence, and become the very adults that work in modern society.
These certain groups of people are seen as individuals with a completely free mindset.
People express individuality, and have
feelings, and do, in fact feel pain.
It can be said that pain can be instilled by that very sensation if it does not
have that correct guide, full of empathy, full of heart and soul.
As a result, from the groups of others in the wonderful democratic society we live in has now emerged a bully.
Today, with the industrialization and the machinery we have, we often take it for granted. Hand in hand, these two different idealisms are ultimately, led by two different guides. In modern society, an automated system, lets say, in a breeding ground, or farm, prepares a herd of cattle or poultry to their termination for food for those who eat
meat. A teacher, the human component of any society in general, leads others among their path, notably to a brighter future.
One may start to ask as to wha t can instill a non-individualistic mindset? In other words, a group
mindset? Someone who prefers to teach with the ruler, who teaches with the intent for individuality or fre e expression regardless of their motif, or someone full of contentment and conviction for co -existence?
With the free modes of thinking we have today, we can, with the drive to search through the cracks, see that the class of poor children is hurt and is filled with fear. The
guide with an empathic heart, or soul, is guided by his or her own desire for others welfare.
Can the disciplined class be inclined to follow with a scary or bad threat? Will they be seen as that one bad group that never learned?
If a disciplined class of adolescents has a mean teacher who forces others to follow them with no real intent other than to be the role model of superior notion, can that class be seen as one with that kind of school of thought? They have an actual ruler, who leads others with a machine-like mindset,
who, one may say, speaks without any contention, or without the restraints of their good hearts.
