• Complain

Justin Driver - The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind

Here you can read online Justin Driver - The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: Pantheon Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Pantheon Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

An award-winning constitutional law scholar at the University of Chicago--who clerked for Judge Merrick B. Garland, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Justice Sandra Day OConnor--gives us an engaging and alarming book that aims to vindicate the rights of public school students, which have so often been undermined by the Supreme Court in recent decades.

Judicial decisions assessing the constitutional rights of students in the nations public schools have consistently generated bitter controversy. From racial segregation to unauthorized immigration, from antiwar protests to compulsory flag salutes, from economic inequality to teacher-led prayer: these are but a few of the cultural anxieties dividing American society that the Supreme Court has addressed in elementary and secondary schools.The Schoolhouse Gategives a fresh, lucid, and provocative account of the historic legal battles waged over education and illuminates contemporary disputes that continue to fracture the nation.
Justin Driver maintains that since the 1970s the Supreme Court has regularly abdicated its responsibility for protecting students constitutional rights and risked transforming public schools into Constitution-free zones. Students deriving lessons about citizenship from the Courts decisions in recent decades would conclude that the following actions taken by educators pass constitutional muster: inflicting severe corporal punishment on students without any procedural protections; searching students and their possessions without probable cause in bids to uncover violations of school rules; random drug testing of students who are not suspected of wrongdoing; and suppressing student speech for the viewpoint it espouses. Taking their cue from such decisions, lower courts have upheld a wide array of dubious school actions, including degrading strip searches; repressive dress codes; draconian zero tolerance disciplinary policies; and severe restrictions on off-campus speech.
Driver surveys this legal landscape with eloquence, highlights the gripping personal narratives behind landmark clashes, and warns that the repeated failure to honor students rights threatens ourbasic constitutional order. This magisterial book will make it impossible to view American schools--or America itself--in the same way again.

Justin Driver: author's other books


Who wrote The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Copyright 2018 by Justin Driver All rights reserve - photo 1
Copyright 2018 by Justin Driver All rights reserved Published in the United - photo 2
Copyright 2018 by Justin Driver All rights reserved Published in the United - photo 3

Copyright 2018 by Justin Driver

All rights reserved.

Published in the United States by Pantheon Books, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York, and distributed in Canada by Random House of Canada, a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited, Toronto.

Pantheon Books and colophon are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Name: Driver, Justin, author

Title: The schoolhouse gate : public education, the Supreme Court, and the battle for the American mind / Justin Driver.

Description: New York : Pantheon, 2018. Includes index.

Identifiers: LCCN 2017058167. ISBN 9781101871652 (hardcover). ISBN 9781101871669 (ebook).

Subjects: LCSH : StudentsCivil rightsUnited States. Educational law and legislationUnited States. Constitutional lawSocial aspectUnited States.

BISAC : EDUCATION/Educational Policy & Reform/General. LAW/Constitutional. LAW/Civil Rights.

Classification: LCC KF 4150 . D 75 2018 | DDC 344.73/0793dc23 | LC record available at lccn.loc.gov/2017058167

www.pantheonbooks.com

Cover design by Jenny Carrow

Endpaper maps by Mapping Specialists

Ebook ISBN9781101871669

v5.3.2

a

For Rebecca Callen Driver and Terrell Glenn Driver, my first and most formative educators

Contents

Introduction

On June 5, 1940, hours before Katharine Meyer would marry Philip Graham at her familys sprawling, lavish estate in Mount Kisco, New York, the happy couple joined an intimate collection of friends for what was meant to be a celebratory luncheon. It would have been difficult to envision a more stately location for the gathering, as the property called Seven Springs Farm contained one thousand acres of land and a nearly thirty-thousand-square-foot Georgian mansion, boasting some fourteen bedrooms, three swimming pools, two servants quarters, and its own elevator. Despite this grand setting, the pre-wedding luncheon proved anything but festive. Instead, what began as an engaging discussion rapidly descended into a ferocious dispute, with several members of the wedding partyincluding both bride and groomexcoriating Justice Felix Frankfurter for an opinion that he issued on behalf of the U.S. Supreme Court only two days earlier. Frankfurterwho prior to joining the Court had been a legendary professor at Harvard Law School, where he was also Philip Grahams beloved mentorusually relished nothing more than vigorous, even combative intellectual exchange. Indeed, The New York Times would remember Frankfurter as the greatest talker of his time and noted, He loved to argue, his head darting here and there, his hand suddenly gripping the listeners elbow as he made a point.

In Mount Kisco, however, the silver-tongued Frankfurter received more than he could handle. Even close to six decades after the incident, the ugly scene at Seven Springs remained with Katharine Graham, as she recalled in her memoir, Personal History: Felix loved and encouraged loud and violent arguments, which everyone usually enjoyed, but this time the argument went over the edge into bitter passion. Those in attendance reviled Frankfurters opinion as deeply disturb[ing] and shock[ing], she noted. The debate grew so intense, so strained that the grooms best man dissolved into emotion as he emitted not merely discreet sniffles, but full-fledged waterworksshedding great large tears that he permitted to stream down his crimson cheeks.

What legal decision elicited this acrimony on such an improbable occasion? The underlying dispute dated back five years, to a community located roughly two hundred miles southwest of Seven Springs but whose reality stood much further removed still from the heights of Mount Kiscos rarefied airin the valleys of Pennsylvanias coal country. On October 22, 1935, in a small town suitably, if unimaginatively, called Minersville, a ten-year-old public school student named William Gobitis refused to recite the Pledge of Allegiance along with his fifth-grade classmates. When Gobitiss teacher noticed that he had not joined the others in saluting the American flag, she marched right over and tried to force his arm into the proper position. But Gobitis managed to resist her entreaties, locking his arm into place, with his right hand clutching his pocket. In response, Minersvilles notoriously austere school superintendent, Charles Roudabush, contacted state education officials to ensure that he possessed the authority to expel Gobitis for this brazen act of insubordination. It made no difference to Roudabush that Gobitis attributed his unwillingness to recite the pledge to his faith as a Jehovahs Witness. As Gobitis subsequently explained in a letter to the school board, heand many other Witnesses, including his older sister Lillianinterpreted Exoduss prohibition on worshipping graven images to preclude participation in the ritual. I do not salute the flag not because I do not love my country, he explained, but [because] I love God more and I must obey His commandments. Despite the claim that the pledge requirement interfered with the Witnesses right to free exercise of religion protected by the Constitutions First Amendment, Roudabush nevertheless expelled the Gobitises, ordering them not to return until they were prepared to salute Old Glory.

Although two lower federal courts vindicated the familys claim, Justice Frankfurters opinion for the Court in Minersville School District v. Gobitis maintained that expelling Jehovahs Witnesses for refusing to recite the pledge did not violate the First Amendment. Portions of Justice Frankfurters opinion, in the 81 decision, extolled the unifying potential of requiring students around the nation to honor the American flag. We are dealing with an interest inferior to none in the hierarchy of legal values, Frankfurter proclaimed. National unity is the basis of national security.The flag is the symbol of our national unity, transcending all internal differences, however large, within the framework of the Constitution.Gobitis concluded, in sum, that judges should mind their own business, and leave educators to the business of molding American minds.

In Minersville, news of the Supreme Courts decision stunned the Gobitises. After hearing a radio broadcaster announce the adverse outcome, Lillian and her mother sat speechless in their kitchen for several minutes, paralyzed in disbelief. Their refusal to pledge had long ago transformed the Gobitis children into town pariahs, with peers flinging stones in their direction and sometimes shouting, Here comes Jehovah! Yet the Courts rejection hardly signaled the end of their ordeal. Shortly after the decision, a close friend called to warn the Gobitises that vigilantes planned to destroy their family-owned grocery store if they persisted in refusing to salute the flag. Fearing violence, the Gobitis parents hastily arranged for their children to relocate to a safe house, and contacted law enforcement to protect the familys modest business. Although a state police cruiser parked outside the store evidently deterred the plot for physical destruction, Minersvilles anti-Gobitis contingent soon alighted upon an alternate strategy of damaging the business: a boycott. This economic approach gained enough adherents to inflict serious financial distress on the Gobitises, who were forced to borrow money from relatives simply to pay their mortgage.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind»

Look at similar books to The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.