• Complain

Abigail Thernstrom - Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections

Here you can read online Abigail Thernstrom - Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2009, publisher: Aei Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Abigail Thernstrom Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections
  • Book:
    Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Aei Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2009
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The 1965 Voting Rights Act is the crown jewel of American civil rights legislation. Its passage marked the death knell of the Jim Crow South. But that was the beginning, not the end, of an important debate on race and representation in American democracy. When is the distribution of political power racially fair? Who counts as a representative of black and Hispanic interests? How we answer such questions shapes our politics and public policy in profound but often unrecognized ways.
The acts original aim was simple: Give African Americans the same political opportunity enjoyed by other citizensthe chance to vote, form political coalitions, and elect the candidates of their choice. But in the racist South, it soon became clear that access to the ballot would not, by itself, provide the political opportunity the statute promised. Most southern whites were unwilling to vote for black candidates, and southern states were ready to alter electoral systems to maintain white supremacy.
In this provocative book, Abigail Thernstrom argues that southern resistance to black political power began a process by which the act was radically revised both for good and ill. Congress, the courts, and the Justice Department altered the statute to ensure the election of blacks and Hispanics to legislative bodies ranging from school boards and county councils to the U.S. Congress. Proportional racial representationequality of results rather than mere equal opportunitybecame the revised aim of the act. Blacks came to be treated as politically differententitled to inequality in the form of a unique political privilege.
Majority-minority districts that reserved seats for blacks and Hispanics succeeded in integrating southern politics. By now, however, those districts may perversely limit the potential power of black officeholders. Max-black districts typically elect candidates to the left of most voters; those officeholders rarely win in majority-white settings. Such race-conscious districting discourages the development o

Abigail Thernstrom: author's other books


Who wrote Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections Abigail Thernstrom - photo 1
Picture 2
Picture 3
The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections

Abigail Thernstrom

Picture 4

Picture 5

To Amy Thernstrom and Michael Callahan, two wonderful people who married into our family. With much love.

Picture 6

Picture 7

Picture 8

Contents

Xi

Xiii

I

III

Acknowledgments

This book would not have been possible without the support of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI), and I am grateful to its long-time president, Chris DeMuth, and his recent successor, Arthur Brooks, for their confidence in my work. Kim Dennis, former director of the National Research Initiative (NRI) at AEI, provided the financial support and encouragement essential to the book's inception. Her successor as head of the NRI, Henry Olsen, drew on his deep knowledge of American politics to make perceptive suggestions that helped shape the book in important ways.

Samuel Thernstrom, director of the AEI Press, not only provided incomparable editing, but also talked through almost every substantive point, enriching my own understanding of the subject in the process. Whatever strengths this book possesses are due in great part to his indispensable help. I am indebted as well to his assistant, Laura Harbold, who provided inestimable assistance with production of the book, to Lisa Ferrarro Parmelee for her meticulous editing, and to Susan Burnell for her careful review of my legal citations.

Several people generously read the manuscript in whole or in part. In their swift but painstaking reviews, J. Christian Adams, Michael Carvin, Roger Clegg, Daniel Lowenstein, and Hans von Spakovsky caught errors and made valuable suggestions, for which I thank them.

I learned a great deal from the many excellent scholars whose work is discussed throughout the book. When I wrote Whose Votes Count? more than twenty years ago, there was very little academic writing on minority voting rights; today a rich and varied literature exists, from which I drew extensively. Richard Hasen's immensely useful ElectionLaw listserve has been a great source of information and insight, and I am indebted to Rick for his indefatigable energy in posting the latest election law news every day.

As always, Stephan Thernstrom read every word and then read them again ... and again. He is my wonderful colleague, and a husband without whom life would be unimaginable.

Foreword
Juan Williams

It is a simple but revealing joke: Even paranoids have enemies!

That one-liner is pretty accurate in revealing a common mindset among black Americans. Yes, we now know a black man can be elected president in this white-majority country. Yes, even the head of the overwhelmingly white Republican Party is currently a black man. And, yes, a vigilant Congress, on the watch for any sly tactic to diminish black voting rights, has repeatedly extended an emergency provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, long after it was intended to expire.

But ... even paranoids have enemies.

So, when the last extension of that provision-section 5-of the Voting Rights Act was about to expire in 2006, it sparked a frenzy of fear on black talk radio, in black newspapers, and, particularly, on the Internet. The basic message just two years before a black man won the White House-was that black people faced the possibility of losing their right to vote.

Section 5 was originally intended as short-term insurance against any sleight-of-hand changes by racist election officials looking to subvert newly established protections for minority voters. In a nation where blacks had been kept from voting with bogus literacy tests and interpretive questions from registrars that had no real answers-such as the infamous, "How many bubbles in a bar of soap?"-section 5 gave the government a way to deal with new forms of such blatant attempts to deny black people their voting rights. It was targeted at the nine states of the Old Confederacy with their history of voter intimidation and poll taxes. Now, more than forty years later, in response to a simple debate about the need for yet a fourth extension of section 5, dire voices claimed that any thought of doing away with it or trimming it back amounted to the end of the whole Voting Rights Act. Some announced that black people would be kept from voting.

Please keep in mind that the most important protections of the Voting Rights Act do not require reauthorization. And note that the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution, establishing the right for black men to vote, is also chiseled in stone into American jurisprudence. The Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment are fixtures in law.

The rumor of the death of the Voting Rights Act often was tied to charges of voter suppression during the 2000 election. The Clinton administration's Justice Department investigated and did not find the evidence to make a case based on voting rights violations or voter suppression. But that did not quash the conspiracy theory. It fell into line with other racial conspiracy theories, including such enduring whispers as the one that has the government giving AIDS to black people.

Nervousness about the end of section 5 also led to questions about Republican efforts to pass laws requiring voters to have government-issued identification. While there have been few extensive cases of voter fraud under existing law, federal courts have generally found voter identification to be a reasonable safeguard against the possibility of it. Nevertheless, that move was seen by the conspiracy-minded as a cagey way for Republicans to depress votes for Democrats by turning away older, low-income, mostly minority voters who are more likely to be Democrats and less likely to have such identification.

To anyone but those most absorbed with this fight, there is the temptation to dismiss all the racial paranoia as just a collective mania. You could write it off as a sad reminder that black Americans have had real enemies at their backs for most of American history. A touch of paranoia is understandable when past generations of your people have been literally hounded, enslaved, and even lynched. Recent elections in the United States have seen fliers arrive in black neighborhoods with the wrong date for voting or inferences about bill collectors waiting to see who votes so they can have people arrested.

When it comes to paranoia, we black people know about ghosts as we pass along stories of Night Riders and the KKK.

You might even explain current outbreaks of paranoia as the cost of ongoing twenty-first-century stereotyping, in which blacks are most often seen on TV in music, and in movies as hyper-violent criminals, rappers who imitate those gangsters and glorify their lifestyle, or comics who think it is fall-down funny to use the N-word. That barrage of negativity is enough to inspire my own paranoia about the way the rest of America sees black people.

So, all this paranoia can be understood as a leftover psychological discomfort erupting out of America's troubled racial history, and nothing more.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections»

Look at similar books to Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections»

Discussion, reviews of the book Voting Rights--and Wrongs: The Elusive Quest for Racially Fair Elections and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.