Screen Jesus
Portrayals of Christ in Television and Film
Peter Malone
THE SCARECROW PRESS, INC.
Lanham Toronto Plymouth, UK
2012
Published by Scarecrow Press, Inc.
A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706
www.rowman.com
10 Thornbury Road, Plymouth PL6 7PP, United Kingdom
Copyright 2012 by Peter Malone
All rights reserved . No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Malone, Peter.
Screen Jesus : portrayals of Christ in television and film / Peter Malone.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8108-8389-5 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8108-8390-1
(ebook)
1. Jesus ChristIn motion pictures. I. Title.
PN1995.9.J4M38 2012
791.43'68232dc23
2012014380
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
Printed in the United States of America
Foreword
When I was invited to write the foreword to Screen Jesus I was extremely honored and proud. I have been fortunate to work with Peter Malone over many years in universities, small summer schools, retreats, and international conferences. Amazed at Peters sheer knowledge of filmfrom who won which Oscars, when, and for which films to who starred, directed, or played a humble supporting character in whichever film under discussionI once called him an Anorak. Peter, being Australian, wasnt familiar with this British expression for someone who gathers and retains endless information on some subject or other and was unsure whether or not I was being pleasant. I was indeed, being pleasantnay, I have again and again found myself utterly bemused by and envious of his sheer ability of recall and his unparalleled knowledge of film and theology.
I have over the years watched generations of students from the college at which I lecture in film, myth, and spiritualities sitting in lecture halls, or in the more intimate setting of workshops, engrossed with Peters enthusiasm for his subject and for the connections he makes between film story, mythic themes, human emotion, and spiritual approaches. Peter is a born movie buff, and that is one of the differences between his writing and that of many others who write about film in an academic environment. Peter is soaked in the stories we tell each other and is just as much at home with a piece of slapstick comedy, a rom-com, a weepy chick flick, a sci-fi adventure, or hanging out with the vampires and superheroes as he is with the more serious attempts of filmmakers to query, investigate, or interrogate the human condition. Many of my students studying for a media and film degree opt to study ideas of the sacred and the screen. They are well aware, as students of screenwriting and the creation of characters, that without offering a spiritual dimension to their characters identities, there is no depth and therefore less hope of connecting with the audience at the kind of level that ensures people will want to see their films again and again. This is a question of the filmmaking craft, but it is also, of course, a commercial issue. Think of The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption with their exploration of goodness, compassion, and hope, or Shirley Valentine who, in direct close-up to the audience, asks, Why do we have all these feelings and dreams if we get lost in all this life? Such movies sell, and sell again, as each new generation discovers them and finds in them answers to their questions on lifeor at least, better questions than perhaps they have, so far, been asking.
A prolific writer on film, Peter has contextualized movies such as these and others too numerous to count, such as Kundun , Meet Joe Black , The Accused , Where the Heart Is (in terms of the liturgy of the Mass), and The Ten Commandments (these in partnership with Rose Pacatte, FSP). His work on film and values continues to shine a light on how stories as varied as Easy Rider (1969) and the American comedy Jesse Peretzs Our Idiot Brother (2011) help us to ask questions of ourselves such as What is goodness? and Is goodness catching? Above all, in the age of that perhaps most enduringly popular movie characterthe superheroPeters work on Jesus- and Christ-figures has enabled us to open up our understanding of the connections and distinctions between the two and how they connect with, and are distinct from, so many movie characters both superhero and those of us who try live with our feet on the ground.
Peters 1988 book Movie Christs and Antichrists does not contain in-depth exploration of one or two films on the Christ-figureothers have done this to great effect, as has Peter as contributor to many such books. Rather, it offers us a long list of categories of Jesus-figures and Christ-figures through a creative, knowledgeable, and significant list of movies from a variety of genres, from Zeffirellis Jesus of Nazareth to Polanskis Rosemarys Baby . I cannot overstate the boon this book has been to generations of film students, many of whom have no or very little introduction to theology. Many students whose culture is based on two thousand years of Christian theology, faith, and practice have been thoroughly impoverished theologically over the past thirty years or so. More and more young people have no background knowledge or understanding of how the past two thousand years of Christian thinking have shaped the world in which they live. They no longer know the stories that have informed our art, our literature, and even our comic book heroes from the early part of the twentieth century. These stories have not been their formation. Their delight, then, when they find it possible to read Mad Max through the character of a savior-figure that can be traced back to the New Testamentnot Jesus as Mad Max nor Mad Max as Jesus but rather a mythic/spiritual identity of one who, as Peter describes it, suffers in a mindlessly violent society and rescuer of victims and leader to safety in Paradiseis one of discovery and encouragement to seek deeper and deeper meaning. Pop-culture saviors speak to the generations who have neither heard, nor are interested in hearing, the Gospel as spoken in church.
Screen Jesus , however, takes that earlier work to another level. As Jaroslav Pelikan did for our cultural understanding of Jesus through the centuries, Peter Malone has compiled a first-rate resource for everyone interested in the Jesus-figure in film since the first movie camera was directed at this subject. The book covers the whole spectrum of films, from Jesus in art to the early twentieth-century Jesus films to Jesus films through the decades; from categories such as Jesus in our world today to verbal Jesus-figures to Jesus and film beyond Christianity to the reverent and the bizarre, including documentaries such as Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus (United States, 2005) and What Would Jesus Buy? (United States, 2007) to Jesus on YouTube and the new wave discourse on this panoramic subject after Mel Gibsons The Passion of the Christ . Peter also sends us to the main scholars in his field, such as Lloyd Baugh, Adele Reinhartz, W. Barnes Tatum, and others.