• Complain

Simon Lo - Controversies in Radiation Oncology

Here you can read online Simon Lo - Controversies in Radiation Oncology full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: Springer, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Simon Lo Controversies in Radiation Oncology

Controversies in Radiation Oncology: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Controversies in Radiation Oncology" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book addresses key issues of controversy in radiation oncology for each disease site, with expert commentaries from leading authorities in the field. It identifies areas of confusion arising from discrepant data in the literature regarding certain clinical scenarios for different diseases and presents high-level evidence on each issue with a view to fostering best practice. Controversies in Radiation Oncology will serve as a very useful resource for busy radiation oncology physicians, practitioners, and trainees/residents/fellows seeking to utilize evidence in the literature to guide the management of radiation therapy patients.

Simon Lo: author's other books


Who wrote Controversies in Radiation Oncology? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Controversies in Radiation Oncology — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Controversies in Radiation Oncology" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Landmarks
Medical Radiology Radiation Oncology Series Editors Luther W Brady Jiade - photo 1
Medical Radiology Radiation Oncology
Series Editors
Luther W. Brady , Jiade J. Lu , Hans-Peter Heilmann and Michael Molls

For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/4353

Editors
Simon S. Lo , Bin S. Teh , Guo-Liang Jiang and Nina A. Mayr
Controversies in Radiation Oncology
Editors Simon S Lo Department of Radiation Oncology University of - photo 2
Editors
Simon S. Lo
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Bin S. Teh
Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
Guo-Liang Jiang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Nina A. Mayr
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
ISSN 0942-5373 e-ISSN 2197-4187
Medical Radiology Radiation Oncology
ISBN 978-3-319-51194-8 e-ISBN 978-3-319-51196-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51196-2
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG

The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

Contents
Dean A. Shumway , Aaron Sabolch and Reshma Jagsi
Matthew M. Harkenrider , Scott R. Silva and Roy H. Decker
Christie Binder and Arthur Y. Hung
Melvin Lee Kiang Chua , Jure Murgic , E. Brian Butler and Bin S. Teh
Kevin Albuquerque , Eric Leung and Nina A. Mayr
D. A. Elliott , N. Nabavizadeh , K. Hiluf and J. M. Holland
Arnold C. Paulino
Samuel E. Day and Lia M. Halasz
Colette J. Shen and Stephanie A. Terezakis
Balamurugan A. Vellayappan , Arjun Sahgal , Kristin J. Redmond , Lia M. Halasz , Eric L. Chang and Simon S. Lo
Andrew M. Farach , E. Brian Butler and Bin S. Teh
Vivek Verma , Waqar Haque , Gary D. Lewis , E. Brian Butler and Bin S. Teh
Ann Raldow and Jennifer Wo
Ann Raldow and Jennifer Wo
Guo-Liang Jiang and Zheng Wang
Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
S. S. Lo et al. (eds.) Controversies in Radiation Oncology Medical Radiology https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2016_83
Breast Cancer
Dean A. Shumway
(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Reshma Jagsi
Email:
Abstract

Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. In appropriately selected patients, radiotherapy not only prevents local recurrences by eliminating residual disease but also results in improved survival. However, not all patients have the same risk of harboring residual locoregional disease, resulting in considerable controversy regarding the role of radiotherapy in individual scenarios. Evidence from clinical trials and observational data analyses can help identify which patients with breast cancer are most likely to achieve a net benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy, both after lumpectomy and mastectomy. Additionally, evidence is emerging now about novel approaches in breast radiotherapy that may reduce burden or toxicity in ways that can optimize the therapeutic ratio, including hypofractionated whole breast radiation, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), intensity-modulated radiation (IMRT), and cardiac avoidance techniques. The objective of this chapter is to review both established and emerging evidence regarding these important issues in an effort to clarify the rationale for increasingly complex and individualized decisions regarding breast radiotherapy.

Introduction

Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. In appropriately selected patients, radiotherapy substantially decreases the risk of recurrence and results in improved survival. Within the previous two decades, considerable progress has been made toward selecting patients most likely to benefit from radiation, along with technical improvements that minimize the burden and toxicity associated with treatment while maximizing clinical benefit.

In an effort to clarify the rationale for increasingly complex clinical decisions, this chapter reviews the rich literature from practice-changing clinical trials in recent years, with an emphasis on the indications for radiation in the context of evolving surgical and systemic treatments, optimal approaches that maximize the therapeutic ratio, and appropriate treatment targets, both after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy.

Early-Stage Disease and Breast Conservation
2.1 Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery

Several randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent survival after mastectomy as compared to breast-conserving surgery with radiation in appropriately selected patients, allowing women to choose a more limited surgical procedure without compromising disease control (Fisher et al. ) and is included as a measure of treatment quality (Surgeons ACo Commission on Cancer Quality of Care Measures; National Quality Measures for Breast Centers).

More recently, the improvement in locoregional control with radiotherapy has been associated with reduction in the overall risk of a recurrence and modest survival benefit as well. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) meta-analysis of data from 10,801 individual patients in 17 studies demonstrated that radiation reduced the 10-year risk of any recurrence from 35 to 19.3 % and reduced the 15-year risk of death from breast cancer from 25.2 to 21.4 % (Clarke et al. ).

However, while the relative benefits of radiation are similar for all patients, the absolute benefit obtained from radiotherapy varies considerably according to patients baseline risk. The EBCTCG analyses have suggested that the survival benefit may be limited to those who obtain the largest absolute risk reduction from treatment, rather than those in whom the absolute benefit in recurrence risk reduction is less than 10 % (Darby et al. ).

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Controversies in Radiation Oncology»

Look at similar books to Controversies in Radiation Oncology. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Controversies in Radiation Oncology»

Discussion, reviews of the book Controversies in Radiation Oncology and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.