• Complain

Robert C. Hyzy - Evidence-Based Critical Care

Here you can read online Robert C. Hyzy - Evidence-Based Critical Care full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 0, publisher: Springer International Publishing, Cham, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Robert C. Hyzy Evidence-Based Critical Care
  • Book:
    Evidence-Based Critical Care
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Springer International Publishing, Cham
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    0
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Evidence-Based Critical Care: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Evidence-Based Critical Care" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Robert C. Hyzy: author's other books


Who wrote Evidence-Based Critical Care? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Evidence-Based Critical Care — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Evidence-Based Critical Care" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Part I
ER- ICU Shock and Resuscitation
Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017
Robert C. Hyzy (ed.) Evidence-Based Critical Care 10.1007/978-3-319-43341-7_1
1. Cardiac Arrest Management
Ronny M. Otero 1
(1)
Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Ronny M. Otero
Email:
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this chapter (doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43341-7_1 ) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords
Cardiac arrest Mechanical chest compression Coronary perfusion pressure High Performance CPR Termination of resuscitation Hemodynamic directed resuscitation
Introduction
It is currently estimated that over 300,000 out-of-hospital cardiac (OHCA) arrests occur in the United States. Over half of OHCA cases are managed by EMS systems [].
Early effective chest compressions and attention to basic life support components are part of high quality CPR. Various organizations have revisited each of the components of cardiac arrest resuscitation over the last couple of years and thus the elements of high-quality CPR are ever-evolving []. Rapid activation of the Chain of Survival and meticulous attention to early defibrillation and chest compressions may lead to greater overall trends in survival.
Case Presentation
A 68 year-old male was playing cards at a casino when suddenly he clutched his chest and became unresponsive. Casino security arrived within less than a minute and applied an automated external defibrillator (AED). AED displayed an audio prompt that no shock was advised. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun within another 10 s. Paramedics arrived and provided two-rescuer CPR with a compression rate of 110 compressions/minute. In the ambulance rescuers used a mechanical compression device to administer continuous chest compressions at a rate of 110 and depth of 2.5 inches with manual ventilation using a bag mask valve. This support was continued until their arrival at the hospital in approximately 9 min. Patient was not intubated in the field. During CPR there was no evidence of an organized cardiac rhythm. Patient had received a total of 3 doses of epinephrine totaling 3 mg via humeral intra-osseous line. Upon arrival in the emergency department endotracheal intubation was performed without incident and capnography displayed a good waveform with an ETCO2 of 15 mm Hg. On arrival emergency physicians administered another dose of epinephrine while continuing CPR. At this point the team leader paused and solicited ideas from the team about possible etiologies for persistent pulseless electrical activity (PEA).
Question
What are methods to assess the quality of chest compressions during CPR?
Answer
Capnography, arterial blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure
Components of high quality CPR include minimizing interruptions of chest compressions with a chest compression fraction of >60 %, correct chest compression rate and depth. Recommended chest compression rates are greater than 100 and a depth of 50 mm with allowance for chest recoil between compression and minimizing ventilations to no more than 1012 breaths/minute []. How well chest compressions are meeting the goal of providing circulatory flow to the brain and vital systems is often difficult to ascertain.
Of the readily available parameters capnography and arterial blood pressure monitoring are the most easily applied measurements to provide feedback of the quality of chest compressions. Close attention to the physiologic response to chest compressions is desirable, as studies indicate that even healthcare professionals have poor recall and variable quality when performing chest compressions [].
Capnography has long-been seen as a potential surrogate for blood flow through heart and the pulmonary circulation [].
Achieving a higher blood pressure during CPR makes intuitive sense, as thoracic compression and thus, cardiac output will be the driving force behind improving cerebral and systemic perfusion. However, the hemodynamics of cardiac arrest is complex and patient-specific factors may be responsible for the variable responses to chest compressions, vasopressors and ventilation. One of the main determinants of successful resuscitation is the coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), which is the difference between the right atrial pressure (or CVP) and aortic pressure during diastole (relaxation phase of chest compression). In the arrested patient there is a delay until there is a complete cessation of flow through the cardiac chambers and by 1 min there is no flow to the coronary arteries. In a human study a CPP < 15 mm Hg was associated with not achieving ROSC []. When the ability to monitor CPP is unavailable a strategy to assess the efficacy of chest compressions may depend upon capnography and diastolic pressure.
Lastly, emerging technology, which provides instantaneous feedback about the quality of chest compressions is now available. This CPR-sensing feedback (FB) system often utilizes accelerometers to detect rate and depth of compressions while delivering audio cues to the rescuer. Currently available CPR-FB systems include the Phillips Q-CPR , Zoll Real CPR Help and Physio-Control compression metronome and Code Stat []. It is not known at this time whether utilizing these CPR-FB systems improves outcomes.
Principles of Management
Standard Approach to Resuscitation
Introduction
Achieving optimal outcomes from cardiac arrest requires collaboration between several disciplines including pre-hospital providers, emergency physicians, cardiologists, cardiac interventionalist as well as several other medical professionals and specialists. All providers in this paradigm should understand each others role as well as what measures can be expected to be offered to a victim of sudden cardiac arrest.
Recognition of Sudden Cardiac Arrest
The ability of laypersons as well as health professionals to detect a pulse has been reported to be extremely poor []. Additionally, agonal breaths may be seen for several minutes after cardiac arrest confounding the confirmation that a patient has arrested. Despite these limitations it is best to activate emergency response system as soon as a patient is unresponsive with a faint or absent pulse.
Chest Compressions
After a pulse check of no more than 10 s chest compressions should be initiated at once. Health care providers should re-double their efforts to improve their knowledge and maintain technical skills relevant to chest compressions. Evidence for maintaining these skills may be gleaned from a multi-center study whereby healthcare providers often performed suboptimal chest compression rates. Specifically, the mean chest compression rate was below the recommended rate and lowest for patients without ROSC (79 18) compared to patients with ROSC (90 17) [].
Specific goals of high quality CPR include achieving a compression rate of at least 100120 compression/minute and a compression depth of at least 50 mm (2 inches) with an upper limit of 60 mm (2.4 inches) []. Between compressions there should be time allowed for full chest recoil in order for heart to refill with blood and maximizing CPP.
Adjuncts to CPR: Oxygen and Ventilation
During the initial rounds of chest compressions rescuers should focus on the quality of the compressions and use passive oxygenation with the highest concentration of oxygen available at the time. The delivery of this oxygen is dependent upon the systemic perfusion that may be established by chest compressions.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Evidence-Based Critical Care»

Look at similar books to Evidence-Based Critical Care. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Evidence-Based Critical Care»

Discussion, reviews of the book Evidence-Based Critical Care and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.