• Complain

J. Michael Cobb - Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia

Here you can read online J. Michael Cobb - Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Savas Beatie, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

J. Michael Cobb Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia

Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A comprehensive study of the Civil Wars first major battle . . . well leavened with strategic and political context (Robert E. L. Krick, author of Staff Officers in Gray).
Battle of Big Bethel is the first full-length treatment of the small but consequential June 1861 Virginia battle that reshaped perceptions about what lay in store for the divided nation.
The successful Confederate defense reinforced the belief most Southerners held that their martial invincibility and protection of home and hearth were divinely inspired. After initial disbelief and shame, the defeat hardened Northern resolution to preserve their sacred Union. The notion began to take hold that, contrary to popular belief, the war would be difficult and protracteda belief that was cemented in reality the following month on the plains of Manassas.
Years in the making, Battle of Big Bethel relies upon letters, diaries, newspapers, reminiscences, official records, and period imagessome used for the first time. The authors detail the events leading up to the encounter, survey the personalities as well as the contributions of the participants, set forth a nuanced description of the confusion-ridden field of battle, and elaborate upon its consequences. Here, finally, the story of Big Bethel is colorfully and compellingly brought to life through the words and deeds of a fascinating array of soldiers, civilians, contraband slaves, and politicians whose lives intersected on that fateful day in the early summer of 1861.
The authors do a wonderful job of describing the motivations and mindsets of both the U.S. and Confederate soldiers at the outset of the conflict and handle slavery very effectively throughout. Edward L. Ayers, author of The Thin Light of

J. Michael Cobb: author's other books


Who wrote Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

The acuracy of the fire of Parrot guns or rifled canon & its terible, destructive force was conspicious. At each fire, the solid columns would open forty yards. I saw where [a shot] passed through the walls of a house [then] through the bodies of 2 poor Yankees mangling them horibly. An old gentleman heard an officer remark that the devil was the artilerist managing that rifle.

Captain Edward R. Young, Mount Vernon Guards, writing in his diary on August 6, 1861 Michael F. Geisinger, transcriber, Civil War Papers of Edward Rush Young

(Vernon Hill, Va.: Michael F. Geisinger, 1994)

You defeat the enemy with a pickax.

Corbulo, Roman general, quoted in Frontinus, Stratagems, 4.7.2

2013 by J Michael Cobb Edward B Hicks and Wythe Holt All rights reserved No - photo 1

2013 by J. Michael Cobb, Edward B. Hicks and Wythe Holt

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Cobb, J. Michael, author.
Battle of Big Bethel : crucial clash in early Civil War Virginia / J. Michael Cobb, Edward B. Hicks, Wythe Holt. First edition.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-61121-116-0
1. Big Bethel, Battle of, Va., 1861. I. Hicks, Edward B., author. II. Holt, Wythe, 1942-author. III. Title.
E472.14.C63 2013
973.731dc23
2013006790

Picture 2

Published by
Savas Beatie LLC
989 Governor Drive, Suite 102

El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

Phone: 916-941-6896
(E-mail)

05 04 03 02 01 5 4 3 2 1
First edition, first printing

Savas Beatie titles are available at special discounts for bulk purchases in the United States by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more details, please contact Special Sales, P.O. Box 4527, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762, or you may e-mail us at for additional information.

Proudly published, printed, and warehoused in the United States of America.

For those whose lives were changed forever
by the clash at Big Bethel

Table of Contents
Introduction

O n the sultry morning of Monday, June 10, 1861, near Big Bethel Church on the marshy border between Elizabeth City and York counties in southeastern Virginia, the well-entrenched Confederate infantry and artillery of Col. John B. Magruder routed a much larger attacking force of Federals under Maj. Gen. Benjamin F. Butler. Only six months prior, South Carolina decided it could preserve the harsh institution of slavery only by leaving the United States. Ten more slaveholding states followed in secession. Fort Sumter surrendered in April, but only inconclusive skirmishing took place thereafter. Bethel demonstrated bleakly but plainly that a bloody civil war had begun in earnest.

The historical interpretation of Big Bethel is overburdened with many assertions of Civil War firsts. While a number of such statements are arguable, three important declarations of distinction stand: it was the wars first land engagement planned by both sides in which the combatants faced each other; Pvt. Henry L. Wyatt was the first Confederate soldier killed in battle; and Lt. John T. Greble was the first graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, and the first regular army officer to fall in the terrible conflict. Since it occurred so early, Bethel was also full of more trivial claims, such as the first musket volley. Relying upon primary sources as much aspossible, this study offers a new and more intricate picture of the battle itself, plus a more contextualized social and political interpretation of its meaning. Bethel influenced the rebellions initial phases in complex and far-reaching ways, and contemporaneous accounts show clearly the significant impact the clash had on North and South alike.

From broad-spectrum surveys of the war to specialized campaign studies, scholarly attention has chiefly portrayed Magruders victory as a trifling skirmish that would have escaped notice had it unfolded later in the hostilities. Some accounts conclude that Bethel led to overconfidence in the South and anxiety in the North.

Even at the time of Bethel, both sides anticipated that the primary focus of conflict would be to the north and west in the broad Virginia land corridor that separated the warring capitals of Richmond and Washington. Each government amassed a giant army in the vicinity of Manassas on Bull Run to defend its own center of governance and to threaten the other. About 5,500 troops faced each other across the marsh below Big Bethel Church, while important subsequent contests would involve tens of thousands of combatants. There were fewer than 100 total casualties at Bethel, and only 19 men died there (according to official reports). The vast carnage at First Manassas five weeks later dwarfed these numbers. In such a context, Bethel was indeed a skirmish.

However, the clash was not trifling. Bethel showed that the South opened the war with better military leadership and that defensive entrenchments rather than open-field lines of musket fire were key to military success. The devastating Federal defeat resounded throughout the recently divided states, alerting many to the likelihood of a harshly contested, casualty-filled war rather than the bloodless denouement imagined by most people on both sides. It proved to Northerners and Southerners alike that their opponents were resolutely dedicated to their cause and would fight hard and well.

Acknowledgments

History is a collaborative process. Many people have generously given of their time and knowledge to aid us in telling the story of the battle of Big Bethel, its antecedents, and its consequences. Several are individually acknowledged below, but we have not been able to name everyone who encouraged, commented, ransacked their memories and their attics, and otherwise graciously assisted us in the various phases of the research and the writing of this book. We apologize for these omissions and for faultiness in our memory, but all contributions from the various intersecting communities relevant to Bethels history have been useful and important. Our thanks go out to you all. We emphasize that any errors in this volume are our responsibility, and should not be laid at the feet of anyone mentioned hereinafter.

Several persons have been indispensable. First and foremost we recognize our long-time friend Tim L. Smith, always willing to assist our efforts at the Hampton History Museum, whose knowledge of the Civil War and of the local people who participated in it or were affected by it is enormous. Tim has professionally prepared all of the images for publication, sometimes selecting a more useful item than the one we had suggested, and often worked overtime or on Saturdays to help us get the book finished. Tim also found an important document for us in his own Civil War collection. Graphic designer and Civil War mapmaker Hal Jespersen drew for us a set of superb maps, fully indulging our desires on several peculiar or difficult items, keeping our focus off picky details, and smoothing the process with his extensive knowledge and experience. Civil War battle histories are judged in part by the maps, and Hal is a master. Authors always need good editors to help them get everything straight, properly located in the text, and well said. We have been most fortunate. Lucas Cade (with the assistance of his wife Julie) has performed pleasantly, capably, and often beyond the call of duty throughout an extensive and thorough editorial process, one in which we have enjoyed collaborating with him.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia»

Look at similar books to Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia»

Discussion, reviews of the book Battle of Big Bethel: Crucial Clash in Early Civil War Virginia and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.