• Complain

Ned Block - The Border Between Seeing and Thinking

Here you can read online Ned Block - The Border Between Seeing and Thinking full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2023, publisher: Oxford University Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Ned Block The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
  • Book:
    The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2023
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Border Between Seeing and Thinking: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Border Between Seeing and Thinking" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Philosopher Ned Block argues in this book that there is a joint in nature between perception and cognition and that by exploring the nature of that joint, one can solve mysteries of the mind. The first half of the book introduces a methodology for discovering what the fundamental differences are between cognition and perception and then applies that methodology to isolate how perception and cognition differ in format and content. The second half draws consequences for theories of consciousness, using results of the first half to argue against cognitive theories of consciousness that focus on prefrontal cortex. Along the way, Block tackles questions such as: Is perception conceptual and propositional? Is perception iconic or more akin to language in being discursive? What is the difference between the format and content of perception, and do perception and cognition have different formats? Is perception probabilistic, and if so, why are we not normally aware of this
probabilistic nature of perception? Are the basic features of mind known as core cognition a third category in between perception and cognition? This book explores these questions not by appeals to intuitions, as is common in philosophy, but to empirical evidence, including experiments in neuroscience and psychology.
This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Enquiries concerning use outside the scope of the licence terms should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press.

Ned Block: author's other books


Who wrote The Border Between Seeing and Thinking? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Border Between Seeing and Thinking — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Border Between Seeing and Thinking" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking PHILOSOPHY OF MIND SERIES SERIES EDITOR - photo 1
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND SERIES

SERIES EDITOR: David J. Chalmers, New York University

The Conscious Brain

Jesse Prinz

Simulating Minds

The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading

Alvin I. Goldman

Supersizing The Mind

Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension

Andy Clark

Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion

William Fish

Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge

New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism

Torin Alter and Sven Walter

The Character of Consciousness

David J. Chalmers

The Senses

Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives

Fiona Macpherson

Attention Is Cognitive Unison

An Essay in Philosophical Psychology

Christopher Mole

The Contents of Visual Experience

Susanna Siegel

Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism

Derk Pereboom

Consciousness and Fundamental Reality

Philip Goff

The Phenomenal Basis of Intentionality

Angela Mendelovici

Seeing and Saying

The Language of Perception and the Representational View of Experience

Berit Brogaard

Perceptual Learning

The Flexibility of the Senses

Kevin Connolly

Combining Minds

How to Think about Composite Subjectivity

Luke Roelofs

The Epistemic Role of Consciousness

Declan Smithies

The Epistemology of Non-Visual Perception

Berit Brogaard and Dimitria Electra Gatzia

What Are Mental Representations?

Edited by Joulia Smortchkova, Krzysztof Doga, and Tobias Schlicht

Phenomenal Intentionality

George Graham, John Tienson, and Terry Horgan Feminist Philosophy of Mind, Keya Maitra and Jennifer McWeeny

The Border Between Seeing and Thinking

Ned Block

The Border Between Seeing and Thinking - image 2

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press

198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.

Oxford University Press 2023

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.

The Border Between Seeing and Thinking - image 3

This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.

CIP data is on file at the Library of Congress

Names: Block, Ned, 1942- author.

Title: The border between seeing and thinking / Ned Block.

Description: New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2022] | Series:

Philosophy of mind series | Includes bibliographical references and index.

Identifiers: LCCN 2022006336 (print) | LCCN 2022006337 (ebook) |

ISBN 9780197622223 (hardback) | ISBN 9780197622247 (epub)

Subjects: LCSH: Cognition. | Perception. | Thought and thinking. | Senses

and sensation.

Classification: LCC BF311 .B554 2022 (print) | LCC BF311 (ebook) |

DDC 153dc23/eng/20220504

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022006336

LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022006337

ISBN 9780197622223

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001

The publisher gratefully acknowledges support from New York University for providing funding for this Open Access publication.

For my grandchildren, Ada, Mae, and Felix.

Contents

This book is about the border between perception and cognitionwhat it is and why it is important. I was drawn to this subject because of the realization that the difference between what I called access consciousness (cognitive access to phenomenally conscious states) and what I called phenomenal consciousness (what it is like to experience) was rooted in a difference between perceptionwhether conscious or unconsciousand cognitive access to perception.

A bit of the material in this book appeared in one of my four Jean Nicod Lectures in Paris in 2014 (though those lectures were on consciousness rather than the perception/cognition border). I am very grateful to Pierre Jacob and Frdrique de Vignemont for their warm hospitality and wonderful intellectual stimulation.

I am grateful to Jake Beck, Philip John Bold, Tyler Burge, Susan Carey, David Chalmers, Rachel Denison, Santiago Echeverri, Chaz Firestone, E. J. Green, Steven Gross, Chris Hill, Zoe Jenkin, Leonard Katz, Geoff Lee, Bria Long, Eric Mandelbaum, Jessie Munton, Albert Newen, Adam Pautz, Mary Peterson, Ian Phillips, Chris Peacocke, Jake Quilty-Dunn, Susanna Siegel, Barry Smith, and anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft. I am also indebted to discussion groups at Berkeley and NYU that discussed an earlier draft. I am grateful to Templeton World Charities for their support and to Rebecca Keller for preparing both indexes.

My indebtedness to my wife, Susan Carey, and to her book, The Origin of Concepts, is visible at many points in the book. The issue I have struggled with most is how to fit core cognition into my picture of the joint in nature between cognition and perception.

Ned Block

Cambridge, MA, November 2021

What is the difference between seeing and thinking? Is the border between seeing and thinking a joint in nature in the sense of a fundamental explanatory difference? Is it a difference of degree? Does thinking affect seeing, or, rather, is seeing cognitively penetrable? Are we aware of faces, causation, numerosity, and other high-level properties or only of the colors, shapes, and textures thataccording to the advocate of high-level perceptionare the low-level basis on which we see them? How can we distinguish between low-level and high-level perception, and how can we distinguish between high-level perception and perceptual judgment? Is there evaluative perception or is evaluation a matter of emotion and perceptual judgment? Is perception conceptual and propositional? Is perception iconic or more akin to language in being discursive? Is seeing singular? Which is more fundamental, visual attribution or visual discrimination? Is all seeing seeing-as? What is the difference between the format and content of perception, and do perception and cognition have different formats? Is perception probabilistic and, if so, why are we not normally aware of this probabilistic nature of perception? Does perception require perceptual constancies? Are the basic features of mind known as core cognition a third category in between perception and cognition? Are there perceptual categories that are not concepts? Where does consciousness fit in with regard to the difference between seeing and thinking? What is the best theory of consciousness and does the perception/cognition border have any relevance to which theories of consciousness are best? These are the questions I will be exploring in this book. I will be exploring them not mainly by appeals to intuitions, as is common in philosophy of perception, but by appeal to empirical evidence, including experiments in neuroscience and psychology.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Border Between Seeing and Thinking»

Look at similar books to The Border Between Seeing and Thinking. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Border Between Seeing and Thinking»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Border Between Seeing and Thinking and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.