• Complain

OConner Patricia T. - Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language

Here you can read online OConner Patricia T. - Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2010;2009, publisher: Random House Publishing Group;Random House Trade Paperbacks, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Random House Publishing Group;Random House Trade Paperbacks
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010;2009
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Stiff upper lips : why cant the British be more like us? -- Grammar Moses : forget these commandments -- Bad boys of English : and why we still love em -- Once upon a time : the whole nine yards of etymology -- Lex education : cleaning up dirty words -- Identity theft : the great impostors -- An oeuf is an oeuf : fractured French -- Sense and sensitivity : PC fact and fiction -- In high dungeon : and other moat points -- Brave new words : the good, the bad, the ugly -- Afterword : Morocco bound.

OConner Patricia T.: author's other books


Who wrote Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Also by Patricia T OConner Woe Is I The Grammarphobes Guide to Better - photo 1

Also by Patricia T. OConner

Woe Is I:
The Grammarphobes Guide to Better English in Plain English

Words Fail Me:
What Everyone Who Writes Should Know About Writing

Woe Is I Jr.:
The Younger Grammarphobes Guide to
Better English in Plain English

Also by Patricia T. OConner and Stewart Kellerman

You Send Me:
Getting It Right When You Write Online

For Dan Green Contents 1 Stiff Upper Lips Why Cant the British Be More Like - photo 2

For Dan Green

Contents

1 Stiff Upper Lips
Why Cant the British Be More Like Us?

2 Grammar Moses
Forget These Commandments

3 Bad Boys of English
And Why We Still Love Em

4 Once Upon a Time
The Whole Nine Yards of Etymology

5 Lex Education
Cleaning Up Dirty Words

6 Identity Theft
The Great Impostors

7 An Oeuf Is an Oeuf
Fractured French

8 Sense and Sensitivity
PC Fact and Fiction

9 In High Dungeon
And Other Moat Points

10 Brave New Words
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly

Afterword
Morocco Bound

Authors Note

Two people wrote this book, but its been our experience that two people cant talk at the same timeat least not on the page. So weve chosen to write Origins of the Specious in one voice and from Pats point of view.

Introduction

My family was the first on our block to get a television seta mahogany Philco console with rabbit ears protruding at odd angles from somewhere in the back. It was an imposing piece of furniture that occupied a place of honor in the living room. This was the early 1950s, and I was about two years old.

My TV watching was rationed, more out of necessity than principle, since it required an adult to turn on the set, fiddle with the knobs, and adjust the rabbit ears for maximum reception. To a toddler, the whole undertaking seemed very grown-uplike reading, or driving a carand was invested with a certain solemnity.

Over time, a few programs became weekly events: Our Miss Brooks, Your Hit Parade, and Whats My Line? Two of the panelists, Dorothy Kilgallen and Arlene Francis, were the most dazzling creatures Id ever seen. But the shows that made the deepest impression on me were the specials that were broadcast from the Metropolitan Opera and the NBC Opera Theater. My mother never missed them.

It wasnt the music that made them so memorableit was my childs-eye view of history. Until I was six or seven years old, I thought that ordinary speech must have been a recent invention, because in the olden days (the days of Carmen and The Magic Flute), people apparently didnt know how to talk. It seemed that they had to sing whatever they wanted to say. This was my first major misconception about language. (The second was that my mother had invented scrumptious, a word I regarded as too silly to be real.)

All of us, Im convinced, have similar misconceptions. When we grow up, our mistakes get more sophisticatedthats all.

Shortly after my first book, Woe Is I, came out in 1996, people started sending me their questions, observations, and grievances about language. When I began appearing regularly on WNYC, a public radio station in New York, the comments multiplied. And they multiplied again when I started a language blog. My in-box was overflowing. To my surprise, every other message seemed to involve a myth, misunderstanding, or mystery about English. If the emailer wasnt misinformed, then it was his daughter-in-law or her boss or a golf partner or even the word maven herself.

And so an idea was born. I had a ready-made source of information: all that correspondence from readers and listeners. Why not write a book to save them from themselves? No one, especially a language junkie, wants to sound like a fool and risk public humiliation. (I know this from personal experience. I once embarrassed myself on the radio by misleading listeners about the origin of the word jeep.) Besides, it would be fun to collect and correct the more amusing, mystifying, and startling misuses of our language.

No subject was safe. Many people insisted that no room to swing a cat referred to the cat-o-nine-tails once used on British warships. Quite a few, I found, were puzzled by what they took to be in high dungeon; one even imagined a dungeon on stilts. Still others thought the word crap could be traced to a man named Thomas Crapper, the supposed inventor of the flush toilet. Some believed that posh was an acronym for port out, starboard home. Would-be sticklers scolded me whenever I split an infinitive on the air or (gasp!) ended a sentence with a preposition. Yet all those are misconceptions, even that business about what not to end a sentence with. Where do these ideas come from, and why do the persistent ones persist?

In some cases, we imagine interesting acronyms for words with ambiguous or prosaic roots. The origin of posh, for instance, has never been pinned down. In other cases, our ears play tricks on us, especially when unfamiliar words resemble more familiar ones. Dudgeon, a case in point, is frequently misheard as dungeon.;

Other mistakes have more complicated histories. Mr. Crapper, for instance, did exist and did sell flush toilets. But he didnt invent them, and the word crap was in use when he himself was barely potty trained. As for those bogus rules against splitting an infinitive and ending a sentence with a preposition, blame a gang of eighteenth-and nineteenth-century Latinists who stubbornly and snobbishly tried to make English more like their favorite language.

In fact, weve been bungling the mother tongue since the days of Beowulf. A medieval scribe once miscopied a single letter in a list of kitchen terms and transformed a cooking utensil into a ferocious hunting dog. He wrote hrodhhund (Old English for a mastiff or hunting hound) instead of brodhhund (believed to be a metal rack for simmering pots of broth). That one had scholars scratching their heads for many a year.

Sometimes, a centuries-old blunder can lead to a modern one. A fifteenth-century mistranslation by the Dutch scholar Erasmus is responsible for the expression call a spade a spade. (The original Greek meant, roughly, call a trough a trough.) Today, many people who dont know the etymologythat is, the historyof this phrase unjustly condemn it as racist. Thus a myth is born.

Even language experts arent immune to these boo-boos. None other than Samuel Johnson, who wrote the great-grandmother of all dictionaries, is responsible for one of them. He suggested that the word nincompoop was derived from non compos mentis, Latin for mentally incompetent. Sorry, Dr. Johnson. The precise origin is unknown, but nincompoop is probably related, like ninny, to the word innocent.

Perhaps the biggest myth of all is that English never changes, that its immutable, like the multiplication tables or the boiling point of H2O. But its ability to renew itself is what has kept English alive and kickingespecially kicking. Words evolve over time, and legitimately so. A wife, for instance, was once simply a woman. The word didnt mean a married woman until 150 years after it first appeared. And flair once meant an odor or the sense of smell; a dog with keen flair had a good nose. But today the original definition exists only in old dictionaries, those repositories of linguistic fossils. Not every fossil is dead, though. The spelling of fierywhich many people think makes no sense whateveris a living fossil, a leftover from the thirteenth century, when fire was spelled fier.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language»

Look at similar books to Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language»

Discussion, reviews of the book Origins of the specious: myths and misconceptions of the English language and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.